Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Republicans win rare victory with judge's confirmation
Associated Press ^ | 10/24/07 | Laurie Kellman

Posted on 10/24/2007 2:36:50 PM PDT by Cat loving Texan

10/24/2007 By LAURIE KELLMAN / Associated Press

The Senate on Wednesday confirmed Judge Leslie Southwick to the federal appeals court in New Orleans after Republicans overpowered objections by Democrats who said he wasn't sensitive enough to the region's history of race relations.

The 59-38 vote, a rare Republican victory in a Democratic-led Senate, was sealed after the nomination survived its main obstacle, a test tally moments earlier in which a dozen Democrats sided with Republicans to thwart a filibuster. That left Democrats without the power to block Southwick's confirmation, even after a heated debate that raised the pain of civil rights struggles in the 5th Circuit, which serves Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas.

Southwick's record as a state appeals court judge in Mississippi drew opposition from traditionally left-leaning groups who warned Democrats that his confirmation could mean consequences come Election Day.

"We regard this as a test," said District of Columbia Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, a member of the Congressional Black Caucus.

"This vote for Leslie Southwick is a vote against the dignity and safety of our families," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese.

But supporters of Southwick's nomination said the choice was rightly decided on his qualifications — not the turbulent history of the 5th Circuit.

President Bush said the confirmation was a victory for the judicial system, and he called for confirmation of other federal court nominees.

"Judge Southwick is a man of character and intelligence who will apply the law fairly. I appreciate the Senate's approval of his nomination," Bush said.

Particularly sweet for Republicans was the pivotal role played by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who sided with Republicans on the Judiciary Committee and voted to give Southwick an up-or-down vote on the Senate floor. Another bonus for the party out of congressional power: Eight Democrats and one independent joined Feinstein in voting to confirm Southwick.

Democrats who voted for confirmation: Daniel Akaka of Hawaii, Robert Byrd of West Virginia, Kent Conrad and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, Feinstein, Tim Johnson of South Dakota, Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Ben Nelson of Nebraska. Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., also voted yes.

The nomination tested a fragile agreement in the Senate to block Bush's judicial nominations only in "extraordinary" circumstances. Some Democratic opponents said Southwick's writings, combined with the troubled racial history of the circuit, met this amorphous standard.

Not Feinstein. She has said that she believes Southwick is qualified, is not a racist and deserved an up-or-down vote by the full Senate.

Republicans showered her with rhetorical roses after the vote, calling her "the heroine," "the lady of the day" and "a profile in courage." In fact, Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., said he would devote a chapter in a future book on leadership to the senator from California.

Some in Feinstein's own party were furious. Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., said she was "incredibly disappointed that a senator from my home state" played such a key role in Southwick's confirmation.

Feinstein, however, wasn't the only Democrat responsible for the confirmation which unfolded in a two-step procedure. The final vote to confirm would not have happened without the initial "yes" votes from Sens. Tom Carper of Delaware, Daniel Inouye of Hawaii and Ken Salazar of Colorado, on the test tally that asked whether to end debate. Support from the three pushed the tally past the 60-vote threshold to advance Southwick to a confirmation vote.

Those three senators then voted against his confirmation.

At issue were two cases in which Southwick was involved as a state appeals court judge in Mississippi. One was a 1998 decision that upheld the reinstatement of a social worker who used a racial slur in reference to a co-worker. Three years later, Southwick joined a ruling against a bisexual mother in a custody case. He also joined what some activists said was an anti-gay concurring opinion.

Southwick's supporters pointed out that those were among 7,000 opinions across the nominee's career and that none of those facts addressed his qualifications. Conservative legal groups began pressuring Democrats from traditionally Republican states to at least give Southwick an up-or-down vote.

Republicans and Democrats have been fighting over this seat on the 5th Circuit for years. Southwick, a law professor, judge and Iraq war veteran, was nominated by Bush in January to fill the slot that has been vacant on the panel since the completion of Judge Charles W. Pickering's recess appointment on Dec. 8, 2004.

Southwick, an adjunct professor at the Mississippi College School of Law, served on the Mississippi Court of Appeals from 1995 until 2006. He previously served as a deputy assistant attorney general with the Justice Department.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: 110th; conservativejudges; districtofcolumbia; eleanorholmesnorton; judicialnominees; southwick

1 posted on 10/24/2007 2:36:52 PM PDT by Cat loving Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan
“Rare victory”? That's the asinine press (AP) for you
2 posted on 10/24/2007 2:43:16 PM PDT by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

So, it’s safe to assume this is the second week in a row the Democrat’s base is in a state of depression and fury?


3 posted on 10/24/2007 2:44:13 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

I don’t know anything about this person. I thought there must be something wrong with this person if Feinstein voted in favor of the appointment.

Must do research!


4 posted on 10/24/2007 2:44:41 PM PDT by Califreak (Duncan Hunter-no clothespin necessary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan
"This vote for Leslie Southwick is a vote against the dignity and safety of our families," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese.

This is a lobbying group for various homosexual groups, including the transgendered. I'm trying to figure out what sort of "families" they are referring to, as well as what sort of "dignity" these families currently enjoy.

5 posted on 10/24/2007 2:44:44 PM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

Another gift from our Catholic politicians. Salt of the earth.


6 posted on 10/24/2007 2:46:30 PM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gramho12

Rep have won more more victories since they lost the Senate then have the loony Dims.


7 posted on 10/24/2007 2:46:46 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

To be appointed to the 5th and have to move to N.O. what a let down.


8 posted on 10/24/2007 2:47:33 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

Gotta wonder what kind of uuuuugly behind-the-scenes cattle-trading took place.


9 posted on 10/24/2007 2:47:39 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

LOL, the DUmmies heads explode once again!!!


10 posted on 10/24/2007 2:48:21 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

Race, race, race, race.

The only race the Democruds really care about is the race to accuse everyone BUT THEMSELVES of racism.


11 posted on 10/24/2007 2:48:41 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

“not sensitive enough to the region’s history of race relations”

TIME TO FRICKIN’ _GET OVER IT_!


12 posted on 10/24/2007 2:50:04 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan
"We regard this as a test," said District of Columbia Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, a member of the Congressional Black Caucus.

How did the White and Yellow Caucus vote?

13 posted on 10/24/2007 2:50:07 PM PDT by avacado (Republicans Destroyed Democrats' Most Cherished Institution: SLAVERY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Some democrats have determined they can never satisfy the moveon.org crowd and are trying to move closer to the center. That’s my guess.


14 posted on 10/24/2007 2:50:53 PM PDT by DrGunsforHands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

“Robert Byrd of West Virginia”
He probably has no idea, or even remembers, which way he voted.


15 posted on 10/24/2007 2:52:50 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

Yes - let’s talk SChip, Dream Act 1 and 2, funding for WOT, etc.,


16 posted on 10/24/2007 3:02:10 PM PDT by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

I believe this is another side benefit of the successful surge. One has to give W full credit for committing to this strategy when everyone was on his case about the war. I just wish he’d think more clearly and resolutely about the illegals.


17 posted on 10/24/2007 3:28:14 PM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

As democrats go, Feinstein is one of the more rational ones. I’ve liked her ever since she called Bush’s warrentless wiretapping program, “impressive”


18 posted on 10/24/2007 3:30:03 PM PDT by Sadecki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gramho12

Thank you!

That was my first thought...what the hell...”rare victory”?

After all the Dems are winning everything they espouse, right?


19 posted on 10/24/2007 3:41:26 PM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

These effing Democrats. THEY are the cause of dysfunction in Washington. And I know it will never happen because we had 12 years of Republicans bending over to try and make the Dimwits happy, but I sure hope they pay them back in spades.


20 posted on 10/24/2007 3:46:31 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (No buy China!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson