Skip to comments.
'This Is Not a Bluff'- A Christian political leader on the threat of a third party.
Newsweek.com ^
| October 23, 2007
Posted on 10/23/2007 11:47:00 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 261-278 next last
To: eeevil conservative
Well, if the “dreaded” Giuliani wins the primary, we can all unite and vote for the third party candidate.
121
posted on
10/23/2007 2:57:46 PM PDT
by
mtnwmn
(mtnwmn)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I would like to see people post where they think we actually all agree such as
1.) Fiscal Conservatism. Who in our group would not agree with wanting a fiscal conservative as a president and if they do not want one why?
2.) Hawks. We all want someone who is strong and will activate our military if we feel there is a threat against out country or our country's core values. Who does not agree with this in our group and or what would be their objections otherwise.
3.) Government out of our lives and business as much as possible. Agree/disagree?
Are there other core agreements people can think of?
With any business comes a mission statement. Although we may disagree on some issues this does not stop us from drawing up clarification of what we CAN and DO agree on. What are those items? Let's list some of those, too.
To: RobbyS
As you say. Newsweek, like ABCBSNBCPBSNPR, is a shill for the Democrats/
To: GreenOgre
Ah, showing your anti-christian bigotry again. Get lost, troll.
124
posted on
10/23/2007 3:07:46 PM PDT
by
darkangel82
(And the band played on....)
To: darkangel82
Any bigotry I have is against stupidity and superstition.
125
posted on
10/23/2007 3:12:40 PM PDT
by
GreenOgre
(mohammed is the false prophet of a false god.)
To: GreenOgre
Go back to DU, you bore me.
126
posted on
10/23/2007 3:14:17 PM PDT
by
darkangel82
(And the band played on....)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
No Giuliani, No Problem.
This is Newsweak proping up the Fruitless Five vote splitters.
Thompson or Romney and Hillary falls.
127
posted on
10/23/2007 3:17:22 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: tennteacher
Clinton + Pelosi + Reid = ?More power and money for Christian elitists. Things have been a little soft recently.
To: GreenOgre
No matter which gang wins, the American people lose.
129
posted on
10/23/2007 3:23:56 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: GOP Poet
I am against Nannyism, whether it’s socialist nannyism, or liberal nannyism, or evangelical nannyism. We have a constitution. I want the Gov out of my wallet, my bank account, my den, and my bedroom.
130
posted on
10/23/2007 3:30:12 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Join the NCAA basketball thread - Freemail me - Go tarheels!)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Newsweek and the MSM want a third party. Ignore them.
131
posted on
10/23/2007 3:34:15 PM PDT
by
bethtopaz
(Liberals don't lie--- they just forget where they buried the dismembered remains of the truth.)
To: MEGoody
132
posted on
10/23/2007 3:37:08 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Join the NCAA basketball thread - Freemail me - Go tarheels!)
To: Grunthor
They love their/our sons, daughters, brothers, fathers, uncles, aunts, and moms serving in Iraq and Afghanistan too.
And will not create a 3rd party, vote 3rd party, or stay home, WITH BOOTS ON THE GROUND, if RG is the nominee. People of faith don't just think about who they will vote for, but who they will elect.
To: GOP Poet
The Republican candidates, with the exception of Ron Paul, are far more superior than the Democrat candidates.
Rudy has stated that he is personally against abortion but he must follow the law. Whether we like it or not the courts have ruled in favor of abortion. I don’t know where he stands on gay marriage??
134
posted on
10/23/2007 3:51:40 PM PDT
by
mtnwmn
(mtnwmn)
To: GOP Poet
The only thing Hillary will win IMHO is the Democrat Primary unless there is a third party in the mix. If there is no third party, I think a Republican will win.
135
posted on
10/23/2007 3:54:42 PM PDT
by
mtnwmn
(mtnwmn)
To: rhombus
I thought Thompson was going to solve this so-called problem for the GOP. It's not a problem for the GOP....it's a problem for the Evangalists.
136
posted on
10/23/2007 4:01:18 PM PDT
by
Fawn
(http://www.brightlion.com/InHope/InHope_en.aspx)
To: tennteacher
I dont’ think they care who they elect. They only care about their issues....if they don’t get their way, they pick up their toys, give the rest of us the finger and go home.
137
posted on
10/23/2007 4:02:52 PM PDT
by
Fawn
(http://www.brightlion.com/InHope/InHope_en.aspx)
To: eeevil conservative
“The fiscal conservatives ran to Perot- but only because our Republican President committed political suicide.”
How did that work out?????
138
posted on
10/23/2007 4:05:06 PM PDT
by
citabria
(Zoom, zoom, Boom, boom)
To: rhombus
I thought Thompson was going to solve this so-called problem for the GOP. There are too many who do not want it solved. They feel they have more power by threats. Frankly, I'm getting a little fed up with the so-called "values voters". We have plenty of good candidates. Get behind one and quit whining.
To: Perdogg
What you may want is God out of your bedroom. That could get you into deep doodoo.
140
posted on
10/23/2007 4:10:43 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 261-278 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson