Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HardStarboard
I wasn't thrilled with the 4Runner, either. It may have excelled in a lot of ways, but I had two basic complaints about it:

1. It seemed too heavy for the powertrain (at the time, I believe the largest engine offered on it was a small V-6).

2. I never liked the idea of building an SUV on a pickup truck chassis. Not enough leg room inside (especially in the back seat).

27 posted on 10/16/2007 10:57:39 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Until recently, most SUVs were built on pickup frames. It adds great strength and allows them to go offroad and not break. (Note that the FJ Cruiser, a Toyota unibody, is having body cracking problems when used offroad.)

That said, lack of legroom is not a function of whether it’s unibody or body-on-frame but of interior design. Case in point is my 90 Nissan Pathfinder - tons of room in the front; my 7’ tall basketball player friend fit inside just fine. Rear legroom is OK - if the front seaters aren’t basketball players and don’t have the seat back all the way. They did fix that later with the next generation of Pathfinder and XTerra.


37 posted on 10/16/2007 11:43:41 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson