Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: padre35
Paul is embracing the notion that the Constitution as written is the absolute prism that Govt should run by, normally that would be fine, but..

willing to give up a little liberty for security eh?
1,742 posted on 10/09/2007 6:50:23 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1111 | View Replies ]


To: traviskicks

not me.....but willing to understand that our enemies have done their homework....

no longer do “countries” invade us militarily (as a nation).....our gov’t needs to pull together and find a legal way to address the part of the Constitution that may hinder us from protecting ourselves.....


1,745 posted on 10/09/2007 6:54:05 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (When will the leftist elites finally award Bill Clinton with the Nobel "Piece" Prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1742 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks
Still waiting for ONE of you Paulbots to answer this simple challenge.

Or is sneering at everyone else while being wholly unable to present an intellectually serious case for your boy all you Paulbots are capable of?

Simple challenge to you Paulites. With NO slogans. NO demagoguery. NO sliming everyone else who doesn’t share your faith. Tell me HOW Paul would do anything. Here is his “Issues page”. NOT a word about what or how he would do anything. Just a bunch of slogans strung together basically screaming bile at everyone and everything.

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/

See, you need us to support Dr Paul. We have no reason to support Dr Paul. So please explain to us WHAT and HOW a Paul Administration would do anything. Do that with OUT sliming any one. No name calling, no hysteric hyper emotive rhetoric. None of the usual Paulite personal attacks in place of reason argument. No cut and pasting of sound bite statements from Paul speeches. NO statements of what YOU think Paul means. REAL plans with documented links so we can read them for ourselves.

1,754 posted on 10/09/2007 6:57:44 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/ vrs the "Worse than Watergate Congress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1742 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

“Willing to give up liberty for security huh”?

Hardly, Dr. Paul doesn’t seem to think that the Commander in Chief had any retaliatory capability found in the Constitution, and I disagree with that notion.


1,794 posted on 10/09/2007 7:11:33 PM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ No more miller brewing products, pass it on....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1742 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson