Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Ron] Paul To Surprise Again? (Fundraising)
RealClearPolitics ^ | September 30, 2007 | Reid Wilson

Posted on 09/30/2007 3:16:26 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

As the fundraising quarter draws to a close at midnight tonight, candidates are scrambling to boost their numbers by any means necessary (we've received two fundraising pitches signed by candidates with the subject line "Hey," and one from a spouse headed "Re: Hey"). And while he's gotten little attention outside his fervent and fanatic fan base, Texas Congressman Ron Paul, who finished the second quarter with more cash on hand than Sen. John McCain, could have another surprise in store for the media establishment his supporters so often malign.

In the run-up to the filing deadline, Paul's supporters were asked to help the candidate raise $500,000 in just a few days. That's more than former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee raised in the entire first quarter, by the way. Yesterday, the Paul campaign revised its goal -- supporters had raised $850,000 already, and the campaign was shooting for $1 million by midnight tonight.

The campaign reached the $1 million mark last night, a full day ahead of schedule.

Paul won't outraise any of the front-runners, but the frugality with which he is running the campaign, as well as the fervency of his supporters and his presence in Iowa and New Hampshire, mean that he will be one second-tier candidate unwilling to drop out before the nominating process takes its course. Paul could cause some serious problems for the front-runners, and it looks increasingly like he will have the money to compete in at least a few early states.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: american; campaignfinance; conservative; dajoooooos; electionlaw; electionpresident; elections; fec; fundraising; gop; greatguy; greens; libertarians; moonbats; muslimsforronpaul; paulestinians; republicans; revolution; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last
To: festus
I've seen several signs for paul in New Jersery around Cherry Hill, Haddonfield, and Moorestown. Some look like official campaign signs, others looked like they were painted stencils. I recall one sign that was stapled to a telephone pole read "Ron Paul RevoLution".
21 posted on 09/30/2007 4:42:11 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Antiwar moonbats are the domestic enemy. Antiwar moonbats willingly give aid and comfort to the enemy during wartime. In my book, that's tantamount to treason. Ron Paul is an antiwar moonbat. You figure it out. If antiwar moonbats are the enemy and Ron Paul is an aid and comfort supplying antiwar moonbat, then Ron Paul IS the enemy!"

-- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07

Nuff Said! ;)

22 posted on 09/30/2007 4:42:55 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
other candidate doing the same thing would be fined millions of dollars!

Fined for what, exactly? What are you saying he has he done that is illegal?

23 posted on 09/30/2007 4:46:16 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
How is that related to this thread? First of all, the thread wasn't posted by a Paul supporter, it was posted by a Fredhead. Second of all, discussing who is donating to Paul and what FEC guidelines he's supposedly violating is still within the FR guidelines. There's no open support of Paul's campaign or his anti-war stand, just benign discussion of his fundraising.

So sick of you FR butt-smoochers who ping the Mods all the time and try to get good FReepers banned just because they don't agree with you.

24 posted on 09/30/2007 4:47:44 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! NFL's all-time touchdown leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Ron Paul is not the enemy.


25 posted on 09/30/2007 4:51:53 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Unfortunately, that doesn’t make any difference at the polls.


26 posted on 09/30/2007 4:52:15 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Unfortunately, that doesn’t make any difference at the polls.

If you're referring to the percentage polls pushed by the MSM that always show Giuliani ahead and Paul "stuck" at 2%, they're worthless.

27 posted on 09/30/2007 4:54:44 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! NFL's all-time touchdown leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

There are some crazy ‘conservatives’ on this website. They’re ok with Republicans bloating the gov’t to no end, not closing the borders, handouts for illegals, not even doing litmus tests for Roe vs Wade on SC nominations but Ron Paul is ‘the enemy’ even though he’s strong on all of these conservative stances. I don’t agree with Paul on Iraq (and I plan on Voting for Duncan Hunter) but these anti-Paul types as far as I can tell are simply Big Gov’t Republicans who want to cling to power as much as Hillary and her ilk do and are scared to actually have a change in the status quo in Washington.


28 posted on 09/30/2007 4:55:09 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
How is that related to this thread?

It's a statement about Ron Paul (the putative thread topic, posted on FRee Republic), by the owner of FRee Republic. Sorry if that made your puzzler all sore, an' stuff.

and try to get good FReepers banned just because they don't agree with you.

No non-moderating poster here has the power (nor even the inclination; you assess an artifically high value as to your importance overall to most of the rest of us, I'd wager... and by a not-inconsiderable amount, I shouldn't wonder) to "get [you] banned." Your own behavior (or misbehavior) is what either gets that done, or doesn't.

Now: wipe your chin, for heaven's sake.

29 posted on 09/30/2007 4:55:32 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
Ron Paul is not the enemy.

For certain constituencies? I daresay.

30 posted on 09/30/2007 4:57:12 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg

Yes, he is.
He is a coward who will not defend this country.
He will break existing treaties with true allies.
He will depend on unpaid pirates who will loot our “Enemies” to pay themselves.

The man is certifiably insane. Certainly not fit to be Commander in Chief.

Ron Paul is supported by anti-Semites and conspiracy-tards.

YES, he IS the enemy. He NOT a republican, not a conservative.
Ron Paul and his followers are Fruit Loops...nothing more.


31 posted on 09/30/2007 5:00:40 PM PDT by Cyclops08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
It's a statement about Ron Paul (the putative thread topic, posted on FRee Republic), by the owner of FRee Republic. Sorry if that made your puzzler all sore, an' stuff.

I'm quite familiar with the Forum owner's statement but Paul is a presidential candidate, so he's going to be in the news and there will be comments posted about him pro and con.

No non-moderating poster here has the power (nor even the inclination; you assess an artifically high value as to your importance overall to most of the rest of us, I'd wager... and by a not-inconsiderable amount, I shouldn't wonder) to "get [you] banned." Your own behavior (or misbehavior) is what either gets that done, or doesn't.

My behavior has been within the rules; it is you guys who ping the Mods every thread when someone who supports Paul posts on it and makes a general comment. I agree that when Paul supporters start bloviating about "war profiteering" or "neo-con" then they should be given the boot, but there's nothing wrong with discussing other aspects of his campaign.

32 posted on 09/30/2007 5:00:57 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! NFL's all-time touchdown leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well get on it then. File a complaint with the FEC. For what? Volunteers who actually aren't making a dime but want to get the message of their candidate out? Who aren't paying anything and in many cases putting signs up in their own yards? Can we help it if nobody wants to even cross the street for any of the other candidates but Rep. Paul's freely show up and give of their own time to support Ron Paul's campaign by marching, making their own signs and T-shirts, and get together in groups to print their own materials and hand them out whenever they can?

Really, what are you going to do? Go to the FEC and claim Ron Paul's campaign is illegal because his supporters are exercising their First Amendment rights independent of the campaign? I realize the establishment hates the man for his stance on practically every issue he's talking about, but you just don't have a viable complaint here.

33 posted on 09/30/2007 5:01:19 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

As a Fredhead, I don’t understand why you’re even worried about this. Perhaps you should worry about Fred’s campaign and let Paul worry about his. All you’re doing is alienating the voters who may vote for Fred in the general, since Fred’s views on limited government is consistent with Paul’s.


34 posted on 09/30/2007 5:04:10 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! NFL's all-time touchdown leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Paul is a presidential candidate, so he's going to be in the news and there will be comments posted about him pro and con.

Which is precisely what I posted. So? And...?

I agree that when Paul supporters start bloviating about "war profiteering" or "neo-con" then they should be given the boot, but there's nothing wrong with discussing other aspects of his campaign.

Which is precisely what I posted. So? And...?

35 posted on 09/30/2007 5:04:56 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
but there's nothing wrong with discussing other aspects of his [Ron Paul's] campaign.

I don’t understand why you’re even worried about this. Perhaps you should worry about Fred’s campaign and let Paul worry about his

In two statements LESS THAN FIVE MINUTES APART.

[*snort*] ;)

36 posted on 09/30/2007 5:08:02 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

He might be going “out of his district”. He’s getting a strong challenge back home. While he’s out playing at running for prez he could lose his house seat.


37 posted on 09/30/2007 5:08:09 PM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

My candidate can’t take in-kind contributions without reporting them (nor would he), so why is Congressman Ron Paul above the law? That’s all I’m saying. Don’t be paranoid without cause, okay?


38 posted on 09/30/2007 5:09:44 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (https://www.fred08.com/contribute.aspx?RefererID=c637caaa-315c-4b4c-9967-08d864cd0791)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

You really are in Seattle aren’t you.


39 posted on 09/30/2007 5:10:25 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! NFL's all-time touchdown leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Paul/Kucinich ‘08 or ? Paul/Sheehan ‘08

I doubt if it would be either. I am sure with cut and runs determination to surrender and appease it is more likely

Kucinich/Paul '08
or
Sheehan/Paul '08
He is so determined to loose he will not care how he does it.
40 posted on 09/30/2007 5:10:56 PM PDT by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson