I'm quite familiar with the Forum owner's statement but Paul is a presidential candidate, so he's going to be in the news and there will be comments posted about him pro and con.
No non-moderating poster here has the power (nor even the inclination; you assess an artifically high value as to your importance overall to most of the rest of us, I'd wager... and by a not-inconsiderable amount, I shouldn't wonder) to "get [you] banned." Your own behavior (or misbehavior) is what either gets that done, or doesn't.
My behavior has been within the rules; it is you guys who ping the Mods every thread when someone who supports Paul posts on it and makes a general comment. I agree that when Paul supporters start bloviating about "war profiteering" or "neo-con" then they should be given the boot, but there's nothing wrong with discussing other aspects of his campaign.
Which is precisely what I posted. So? And...?
I agree that when Paul supporters start bloviating about "war profiteering" or "neo-con" then they should be given the boot, but there's nothing wrong with discussing other aspects of his campaign.
Which is precisely what I posted. So? And...?