To all antiwar moonbats, Paulistas included:
Hey, if you don't like FR and or our support the war policies leave. Go find a website that supports your unfortunate, short-sighted and misguided antiwar efforts. It's really that simple.
In case you antiwar Paulistas haven't noticed, Free Republic supports the war effort 100%. Many of our chapters protest against the antiwar moonbats either weekly, monthly or whenever the opportunity arises. The DC Chapter has been protesting against the antiwar moonbats EVERY Friday night at Walter Reed for three years.
Free Republic has co-sponsored several cross country caravans and hundreds of rallies in cities all across the country and in DC against the antiwar moonbats and in support of our Commander-in-chief, our troops, the war effort and our Gold Star and Blue Star families, many of whom are FReepers.
When you are supporting antiwar moonbats you are working against Free Republic's mission, hurting our efforts, hurting our families who have lost loved ones or have loved ones involved in the fighting, hurting our troops, damaging their morale, working against our efforts to defeat the enemy, and, in fact, giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
Antiwar moonbats are the domestic enemy. Antiwar moonbats willingly give aid and comfort to the enemy during wartime. In my book, that's tantamount to treason. Ron Paul is an antiwar moonbat. You figure it out. If antiwar moonbats are the enemy and Ron Paul is an aid and comfort supplying antiwar moonbat, then Ron Paul IS the enemy!
If you Paulistas are looking for support on FR for an antiwar moonbat who is giving aid and comfort to our enemies, you're nuts! Free Republic will NEVER support antiwar moonbats!
As far as our official policy on Ron Paul is concerned, it's the same policy we have for his antiwar moonbat allies the traitors Harry Reid, Chuckie Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Jack Murtha, Cindy Sheehan, Barbara Streisand, Jane Fonda, CodePink, International Answer, et al and their flaming antiwar spam monkeys. Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!
Where the hell did you guys ever get the idea that enemy supporting antiwar moonbats would be welcome on FR?
That plain enough for you or do I need to spell it out?
My new tag line! Dibs! DIBS -- !!! ;)
PING to post #168
You need to read this. ;)
And made us proud!
Hey, if you don't like FR and or our support the war policies leave. Go find a website that supports your unfortunate, short-sighted and misguided antiwar efforts. It's really that simple.
In case you antiwar Paulistas haven't noticed, Free Republic supports the war effort 100%. Many of our chapters protest against the antiwar moonbats either weekly, monthly or whenever the opportunity arises. The DC Chapter has been protesting against the antiwar moonbats EVERY Friday night at Walter Reed for three years.
Free Republic has co-sponsored several cross country caravans and hundreds of rallies in cities all across the country and in DC against the antiwar moonbats and in support of our Commander-in-chief, our troops, the war effort and our Gold Star and Blue Star families, many of whom are FReepers.
When you are supporting antiwar moonbats you are working against Free Republic's mission, hurting our efforts, hurting our families who have lost loved ones or have loved ones involved in the fighting, hurting our troops, damaging their morale, working against our efforts to defeat the enemy, and, in fact, giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
Antiwar moonbats are the domestic enemy. Antiwar moonbats willingly give aid and comfort to the enemy during wartime. In my book, that's tantamount to treason. Ron Paul is an antiwar moonbat. You figure it out. If antiwar moonbats are the enemy and Ron Paul is an aid and comfort supplying antiwar moonbat, then Ron Paul IS the enemy!
If you Paulistas are looking for support on FR for an antiwar moonbat who is giving aid and comfort to our enemies, you're nuts! Free Republic will NEVER support antiwar moonbats!
As far as our official policy on Ron Paul is concerned, it's the same policy we have for his antiwar moonbat allies the traitors Harry Reid, Chuckie Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Jack Murtha, Cindy Sheehan, Barbara Streisand, Jane Fonda, CodePink, International Answer, et al and their flaming antiwar spam monkeys. Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!
Where the hell did you guys ever get the idea that enemy supporting antiwar moonbats would be welcome on FR?
That plain enough for you or do I need to spell it out?
Jim , I think that's pretty clear and spelled out. It's also clear that folks, in responding to RP, are suddenly espousing lots of things Republicans and conservatives used to hate: the IRS, instrusive government, huge new FedGuv departments, UN mandates in foreign affairs, BigGuv minding your own business, and so on. I encourage a clear line between running down candidates and scorning limited government in the process. One can support national security and still oppose BigGuv run amok. Hence, one can look at the current crop of Republican candidates and be dismayed not to see a fiscal conservative in sight, aside from Tancedero and Paul.
As for RP's anti-war stand, I think many Americans are justly concerned about the already-demonstrated possibility of "scope creep." It would be easier to rebut RP if this war were framed more clearly. Is the goal a disarmed Iraq? Peace in Iraq? Is it a self-reliant Afghanistan? A defanged Iran? An occupied Iran? Is it an open-ended posture of defnese against radical Muslims everywhere? Is it an open-ended posture of offense against them? Is it a war against ALL Muslims? Where's the finish line?
BTW, my dad was a vet of WW II, Korea, and Vietnam, and he had a reasoned way of being able to view wars from a soldier's viewpoint while still seeing through to the BS that is Washington and global politics. He served with distinction but never gave up his right to question the muddle-headed policies that put soldier's in harm's way. He was a Reagan man before Reagan was cool. I approved and affirm his reasoning and reference it in my own. I don't think he ever resorted to telling someone they could kiss his ass, either. He had more principle than that.
That's nice, Jim. So the only Republican Presidential candidate running who bases his platform on constitutional principles is now an anti-war moonbat. The only candidate who is espousing anything like a change from the big government business-as-usual policies and platforms of the GOP for the last 7 years is unwelcome on a site that claims to value the exact issues that make up his campaign. So much for all that nice talk about preserving the constitutional principles of the Founders. I guess they're disposable in the face of some high-sounding globalist, neocon rhetoric.
Jim Robinson for President!
Yes please create a statement topic like this that we can point out to those Cindy Sheehan wanna bees.
I was waiting for this. You're a more patient man than I am.
I have been quietly knocking the doors and minds of the Paulbats ever since his first debate when he gave the sickening pablum response that Islamofascists are the fault of OUR foreign policy. Every week, he continues to lay out the same kind of drivel, yet people that should know better applaud his rantings with moonbeams in their eyes.
The man's mind is incapable of handling the threat of Islamofascists, and unfortunately his true believers are blindly following under the banner of "constitutionality".
Woo-Hoo! Thank you JR!
Down here in San Diego, the anti war Paulistas were out on the street protesting the war. They did NOT go unanswered!! Some of us (including the SD Protest Warriors) were there to counter them!
Woo-Hoo! Thank you JR!
Down here in San Diego, the anti war Paulistas were out on the street protesting the war. They did NOT go unanswered!! Some of us (including the SD Protest Warriors) were there to counter them! I saw first hand what the paulistas were all about!
It's a keeper of a link.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1904472/posts?page=168#168
ooorah-
Bump as a keeper!
bookmark
Antiwar moonbats certainly number *among* the domestic enemies. But I would also include all those who support socialism, even if they have an 'R' by their name, and even if they happen to currently occupy the White House.
Bump. Great post!