Posted on 09/28/2007 7:42:35 AM PDT by blam
Myths of British ancestry
October 2006
Stephen Oppenheimer
Everything you know about British and Irish ancestry is wrong. Our ancestors were Basques, not Celts. The Celts were not wiped out by the Anglo-Saxons, in fact neither had much impact on the genetic stock of these islands
The fact that the British and the Irish both live on islands gives them a misleading sense of security about their unique historical identities. But do we really know who we are, where we come from and what defines the nature of our genetic and cultural heritage? Who are and were the Scots, the Welsh, the Irish and the English? And did the English really crush a glorious Celtic heritage?
Everyone has heard of Celts, Anglo-Saxons and Vikings. And most of us are familiar with the idea that the English are descended from Anglo-Saxons, who invaded eastern England after the Romans left, while most of the people in the rest of the British Isles derive from indigenous Celtic ancestors with a sprinkling of Viking blood around the fringes.
Yet there is no agreement among historians or archaeologists on the meaning of the words "Celtic" or "Anglo-Saxon." What is more, new evidence from genetic analysis (see note below) indicates that the Anglo-Saxons and Celts, to the extent that they can be defined genetically, were both small immigrant minorities. Neither group had much more impact on the British Isles gene pool than the Vikings, the Normans or, indeed, immigrants of the past 50 years.
The genetic evidence shows that three quarters of our ancestors came to this corner of Europe as hunter-gatherers, between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago, after the melting of the ice caps but before the land broke away from the mainland and divided into islands.
(Excerpt) Read more at prospect-magazine.co.uk ...
Ping.
'O' type blood? The highest percent of people in the world with 'O' type blood is behind Offas Dyke.
A lot. The Normans continued to speak French among the nobility, but the masses did not. The language of Chaucer's stories bear more resemblance to Beowulf than to the Chansons of France.
It is rare to find the raw guttural, monosyllabic, Germanic words in modern English. He who rules get to set the what language is spoken.
There are many, many Germanic words in English. And Latinate, and Nordic and others. English is a polyglot, which freely borrows.
English borrows words from all languages, but the structure of English is closer to German than to the Romance languages.
I think I read somewhere that when J.R.R.Tolkien (wrote Lord of the Rings) was a student at Oxford, he proposed a resolution that the Norman Invasion be condemned. In addition, words from Anglo-Saxon should be used instead of those from French. He didn't like French. He became a professor of Anglo-Saxon.
One could throw into the mix, that the Welsh could claim to be an indigenous people. Hard to classify these persons with the rest of the British Isles.
I think the Welsh immigrated to the British Isles about 1000 B.C., so they really need to rethink that indigenous claim. On the other hand the word British derives from the Celtic name Bryttas. That is what the Celts called themselves before the Anglo-Saxons starting calling them Welsh. So the Celts took an Anglo-Saxon name, Welsh, for themselves, and the Anglo-Saxons took a Celtic name, Briton, for everyone living in that land.
I am very fond of England and thank the English for giving such a wonderful language to the world.
|
|
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach | |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
|
|
Within two generations, the genetic makeup will be mostly West Asian and African.
I think you are correct...And, living under Shariah Law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.