Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Bloomberg is such a twirp.
1 posted on 09/25/2007 10:01:12 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Some folks put safety before freedom, they are called Sheeple!
They often end up as slaves.


2 posted on 09/25/2007 10:05:37 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I am shocked!! There is someone out there who is an even BIGGER TWERP on the 2A then Roooday. If “Roooday” runs as a democrat he has a far better chance of the nomination than he does running as a GOP candidate!


3 posted on 09/25/2007 10:07:11 PM PDT by Mtner77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Bump to a PAIR of sick, demented gun-grabbers....


4 posted on 09/25/2007 10:20:02 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I hope Bloomberg is prosecuted on federal RICO charges. He is trying to extend his city law enforcement jurisdiction across state lines. He has hired people to harass gun shops all over the U.S. It's time to put him on the defensive.
5 posted on 09/25/2007 10:27:46 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Rudy has done nothing to distance himself from the most disturbing gun position he holds.

In this Feb 2000 interview on Meet the Press, Rudy said, "...a person who wants to possess a handgun should pass a written test, should be able to pass a physical test in the actual use of the gun, and should have to demonstrate good moral character and a reason to have the gun. That those should be...essentially there should be a uniform law passed by Congress that says that every state has to administer that...."

He went on to say, "...and I've been arguing for that since at least 1980."

My questions are, why should I have to show a reason to have my handguns, or to buy more of them, and where does the Congress get the power to pass such a law?

I think the whole notion that I should have to show a reason for buying a handgun inverts the natural relationship of a citizen and his government. The government should have to show a reason why I should NOT buy a handgun, rather than requiring me to show a reason why I should. A person who holds the opposite conviction just has a fundamentally different view of government from mine, and I can't support that view.
7 posted on 09/26/2007 3:19:52 AM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Bloomburg is a danger to the America I know and love.
9 posted on 09/26/2007 5:25:30 AM PDT by Edgerunner (If you won't let the military fight your battles, you will have to. Keep your powder dry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.


China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million ‘educated’ people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.


It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent

Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent

Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!

It will never happen here?.................. I bet the Aussies said that too!

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.

There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.

You won’t see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.

Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.

Take note my fellow Americans, before it’s too late!

The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.

With Guns..........We Are “Citizens”.
Without Them........We Are “Subjects”.

During W.W.II the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!


10 posted on 09/26/2007 6:24:19 AM PDT by fweingart (Tom Tancredo Will Get The Job Done! (PS: I Don't Like The Clintons.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The Second Amendment is not a matter of interpretation, it’s a matter of fact. Not believing that and pressing for a total ban will warrant a large mob.


11 posted on 09/26/2007 7:27:30 AM PDT by wastedyears (George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

okay-let the little runt billionaire walk around with no armed security and see how welcome he feels in “his” city


14 posted on 09/26/2007 7:49:09 AM PDT by steamroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyborg; Clemenza; Cacique; NYCVirago; The Mayor; Darksheare; hellinahandcart; Chode; ...
N.Y. Unveils Plan to Give Illegal Immigrants Drivers' Licenses

FReepmail me if you want on or off my New York ping list.

I don't know who's worse, Spitzer, Bloomberg or the fools that elect them.

16 posted on 09/26/2007 12:53:29 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

A RICH one at that!!!!!!!!


17 posted on 09/26/2007 1:04:07 PM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson