Posted on 09/25/2007 6:36:36 AM PDT by TomGuy
President Bush to address the UN this morning. Approx time: 9:45 EDT/8:45 CDT
President Amanutjob to address the UN this evening.
Now the liberals can decide which is worse, Bush/Cheney or the Iranian Hitler.
More Importantly than an invitation to Islam, he invited the Nations to help him bring about the re-appearance of the Mahdi, who, according to Ahmadinejad is coming back with Jesus.
Now the liberals can decide which is worse, Bush/Cheney or the Iranian Hitler.
Is there any question? Bush/Cheney are WAYYY worse! LOL /sarc
According to Revelation he has that right, but Ahmad's guy would be the antichrist.
by coming to Islam, I assume
True. I got a big sinking feeling with this speech.
Whoa...that sounded like a bit more than rhetoric.
Thank God for Sarkosky...we need REAL allies now.
http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=142910
I found something scary, the official text ending is different then the one he just gave live infront of the UN. The text doest not mention the last line of the live UN speech where he says, “in the very near future all that he predicted will happen” Can’t remember exactly what he said, but it was a clear threat to the U.S.
Why is the official transcript different then what he said live?
This does not look good.
Anyone who remembers his exact quote please post.
Thanks for posting that.
I don’t remember his exact words but you paraphrased it very well.
Thanks for posting this- for the record.
The UN changed his speech? Hmmmm
Here’s an interesting tidbit from his spewing:
B. Occupation of countries and exacerbation of hostilities
Occupation of countries, including Iraq, has continued for the last three years. Not a day goes by without hundreds of people getting killed in cold blood. The occupiers are incapable of establishing security in Iraq. Despite the establishment of the lawful Government and National Assembly of Iraq, there are covert and overt efforts to heighten insecurity, magnify and aggravate differences within Iraqi society, and instigate civil strife.
There is no indication that the occupiers have the necessary political will to eliminate the sources of instability. Numerous terrorists were apprehended by the Government of Iraq, only to be let loose under various pretexts by the occupiers.
It seems that intensification of hostilities and terrorism serves as a pretext for the continued presence of foreign forces in Iraq.
I wonder if the homosexuals in Iran should take heed of this thinking? They could say they were going to act in a homosexual way, as a warning, and therefore not be guilty. Might have saved some lives if they had a right to be favored with the same principle!
On another aspect, I hate that he was invited here both to Columbia and the UN. On the other hand, seeing him and listening to how deranged he truly is might finally convince some liberals why Bush has avoided any sort of "talks" with this man because he knows it is totally fruitless. Liberals have never trusted Bush and his approach; nor believed he had a good grasp of how much of a lunatic he is and most Iranian leaders are. Now maybe some of them (some - at least) will change their tune now that they have been exposed first-hand to this madman's rhetoric and threatening words. Some just have to have the brick wall fall on them, it appears.
Our liberal politicians and their supporters are all negative and pessimistic about Bush's national policy, scaring people all the time - just to widen the gap between the parties here. When it comes to international dealings, they are all optimism and hope, blue skies and rainbows, and willing to believe we can resolve anything by "talking" with all the terrorist crazies of the world. Let's hope some have grown up and shed their teenage idealism and naiveté when the evil has truly stared them in the face and told us the Iranian's are definately on the warpath against anyone who does not espouse their beliefs and cultural quirks! We have been warned.
Welll...I am back (alive) from my 3-hour chem lab, finished the lab report, and ate dinner. I missed the entire UN shabang, including the nutjob. I dunno which would’ve been more exhausting...
I’m still debating which was more painful to watch—the Senators/Congressmen acting like baboons during the Petraeus hearing or yesterday’s shindig at CU.
That earlier link wasn’t the actual transcript afterall. Here’s the actual transcript:
http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/62/2007/pdfs/iran-eng.pdf
There’s a BIG difference between the two.
Which is the more complete? The official UN version?
Yeah, it looks like the UN transcript is the speech he actually gave. That other left out all sorts of things.
The address was given by DOCTOR Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? I didn’t know the nutjob had a degree...am I missing something?
I’m only about halfway through the UN transcript but I can tell you now that the other transcript is NOTHING like this one.
I’m actually bothered quite a bit by what I am reading right now.
I just heard on the news...when nutjob started to speak...US delegation all walked out of meeting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.