1 posted on
09/24/2007 7:57:56 PM PDT by
mdittmar
To: mdittmar
“Senate Dems reluctant to try.”
Fixed.
2 posted on
09/24/2007 8:01:07 PM PDT by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Tracking The Flyin' Imams Since 11/20/06)
To: mdittmar
Philippe Reines, press secretary for Clinton, said that the senator is seeking any and all possible ways to reverse the current course in Iraq.
She's scared to death of angering the Commie MoveOn.org crowd.
3 posted on
09/24/2007 8:04:53 PM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: mdittmar
Shut up, just shut up!
Why can’t the Congress just shut up, for one minute, one day, one month?
We could be out sooner if they would just shut up!
(obviously they don’t want to be out soon, or they would not give aid and comfort by their refusal to shut up!)
To: mdittmar
The Hill has now caught up with what I have been saying and writing for weeks now. Withdrawing the "authorization for the use of military force" requires only a majority vote of both Houses of Congress. It cannot be vetoed.
On paper, the Democrats could do this. The fact that they do not even try, demonstrates -- if any demonstration be needed -- that the Democrats are hypocrites. This is proof that they do not mean what they say in their anti-war rants.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article, "Dan Rather, CBS, Plus Duke"
6 posted on
09/24/2007 8:20:55 PM PDT by
Congressman Billybob
(2008 IS HERE, NOW. www.ArmorforCongress.com)
To: mdittmar
The Dims painted themselves into a corner for the last election..."Vote for me and I'll end the war." Now, the peaceniks want their payday, and the Dims in Congress found out they would have to actiually back up their promise.
The mistake they made, was they brought it up 2 years too early.
7 posted on
09/24/2007 8:24:59 PM PDT by
Pistolshot
(Keyes/Paul '08 - When you can't get crazy enough.)
To: mdittmar
What a useless bunch of clowns the dems are. Well, worse than useless; they’re anti-American, anti-military, and anti-victory.
8 posted on
09/24/2007 8:29:03 PM PDT by
hsalaw
To: mdittmar
9 posted on
09/24/2007 8:36:32 PM PDT by
do the dhue
(They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
To: mdittmar
I dont think we should waste our time on that, said Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), a vocal opponent of the war. Thats not going to change anything. Why should that matter? Nothing you have done this session has changed anything anyway. You have wasted your time and ours with your non-binding Senate agenda.
To: mdittmar
Senate Dems reluctant to try to revoke Iraq war authority Of course, such a bill could be vetoed. It would take super majority to pass it, and even with RINO help, they don't have that. However just not passing the supplemental appropriation for the war would not be subject to veto. The President can't veto what is never passed. That's what Hillary is really calling for.
13 posted on
09/24/2007 10:11:33 PM PDT by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: mdittmar
We would wind up authorizing what we have now so its complicated, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.)
Cary is hoping Markos will buy that garbage. He'll need the kos kids in his korner for re-election this time.
15 posted on
09/25/2007 3:14:39 AM PDT by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: mdittmar
The Dems do not have the cullions to defund the war in Iraq. Such a move would permanently attach the disaster that would immediately result in Iraq to them and allow no room to shift blame to Bush.
16 posted on
09/25/2007 5:23:54 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson