Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UAW Workers Walk Off the Job
Wall Street Journal ^ | September 24, 2007 | John D. Stoll and Jeffrey McCracken

Posted on 09/24/2007 8:33:39 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Edited on 09/24/2007 8:57:31 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

DETROIT -- United Auto Workers union members walked out of General Motors Corp. factories in the U.S. Monday morning after bargaining over a new national labor agreement failed to produce a deal by an 11 a.m. deadline. It's the first time in more than 20 years that the UAW has staged a mass walkout in connection with company wide contract talks. But in a sign of the complex forces at work in the Detroit auto industry, GM shares were trading higher Monday on the New York Stock Exchange, as investors cheered signs that GM management might be willing to resist ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: automakers; generalmotors; gm; uaw; unions; unitedautoworkers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321 next last
To: jcs1744; All
Really? They get sick from the paint and wear their bodies out? I thought the union was supposed to protect those workers.... hmmm... Anyway, the majority of people who wear their bodies out doing manual labor don’t have unions “protecting” them. Nor are they doing a low-skill job for $40 an hour.

If it weren't for the union it would be worse. You know, people falling into vats of paint stripper, working in unbreathable air, no vacations, no breaks...there are places like that in Michigan and 1000s of them in China and Mexico. I know people who've worked in them. I'm sure there are those types of "sweat shops" in other states.

How skilled are miners, how skilled were the garment manufacturers, how skilled are the truckers... it isn't so much that the workers aren't skilled, it's a niche skill and they put up with discomfort. It's too bad the unions had to take the protection three steps further and kill the jobs and the hands that fed them. Companies try to get away with whatever they can, that's why the need for unions.

I agree on the R & D. It is a problem and GM was just getting enough money together in order to keep up with the foreign companies.

Who makes $40 an hour? When was the last time you drove a GM car? I swear the biggest problem people have with the unions is that they are jealous of auto workers and their pay, but they wouldn't do the jobs.

301 posted on 09/25/2007 5:44:55 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Oh it’s been awhile since I was union. And that was only til I could find a different job with my employer that was non union. I think that I could opt out of the union but was still required to pay the portion that the union used to negotiate wages. The big bummer is, you don’t join the union you never get the seniority to move up the list during vacation call, no union absolutely no seniority. My guess would be that if you weren’t union you’d also be the first forced to do mandatory overtime since you’d be at the bottom of the seniority list. So I paid the dues when in jobs that require it and so does my daughter.


302 posted on 09/25/2007 5:59:16 AM PDT by tickles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: epow

Yes, Ohio is a right to work state.


303 posted on 09/25/2007 7:50:18 AM PDT by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: madison10
If it weren't for the union it would be worse. You know, people falling into vats of paint stripper, working in unbreathable air, no vacations, no breaks...there are places like that in Michigan

If there are still places like that in Michigan, I doubt they're staffed by folks who are in this country legally. People - including myself - complain about the blankety blank plaintiffs' attorneys, but I will give them credit where credit is due. Any manufacturer who runs that type of plant in the US today will be put out of business by lawsuits. If you really did see someone fall into a vat of toxic paint, they (or their survivors) are likely millionaires. If not, they needed a better attorney or a green card.

304 posted on 09/25/2007 8:39:07 AM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: madison10
Companies try to get away with whatever they can, that's why the need for unions.

I agree an employer is in business to make money, and I think the unions have done a lot of good over the years, however, I question whether the good they still occassionally do is outweighed by the negative. Also, truly, can't plaintiffs attorneys fill the holes for any good a union may do today.

305 posted on 09/25/2007 8:43:20 AM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Obviously you want to be a union leader and not a union member. The pay and benefits are great. I laughed my ass off when CWA and IBEW struck PacBell in 1989. The union members were walking up and down the sidewalk with signs and threatening non-union employees coming to work. The union bosses were driving by in a big, black limousine. While the union employees were on strike, PacBell was saving huge amounts of salary expense. They were also installing modernized switches and computing equipment that eliminated many of the striker's job. When it was over, PacBell saved far more expense than any benefits conceded to the union negotiators. As usual, the union members lost more than they would ever recover before the contact expires.

I spent most of that strike driving to all the desert central offices from midnight to noon. My colleague covered the noon to midnight shift. I worked the open orders and trouble tickets to stave off boredom. The company paid me 4 hours of overtime, my lodging and food for the duration of the strike. It was nice as I normally worked more than 12 hours per day and didn't get paid for more than 8.

306 posted on 09/25/2007 11:15:59 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: madison10

OSHA has done more for workplace safety than the unions have in the last 50 years. I don’t buy your arguments about unsafe workplaces there.


307 posted on 09/25/2007 11:31:30 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: old and tired

I’m having trouble believing that such a place existed without someone siccing OSHA on them...


308 posted on 09/25/2007 11:32:13 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: old and tired

Between them and OSHA, yup. I worked at UPS for a while, was a Teamster, and none of my safety complaints to my union rep did anything. I called OSHA, and the problem was solved within a week.


309 posted on 09/25/2007 11:34:17 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
OSHA has done more for workplace safety than the unions have in the last 50 years. I don’t buy your arguments about unsafe workplaces there.

You just don't know the people I know, that's all.OSHA inspections are a joke. They give advance warning, a company cleans up, OSHA leaves, and everything is back to the status quo.

310 posted on 09/25/2007 12:03:12 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Then you have much corruption up there in union-controlled country. Down here, they have *teeth* - and they do surprise inspections.

And if the company cleans up the problem, that’s the whole object of the exercise anyway.

The question is, why isn’t this union forcing the company to clean up, hm? Aren’t they supposed to be “for the worker?”


311 posted on 09/25/2007 12:06:48 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Then you have much corruption up there in union-controlled country. Down here, they have *teeth*-and they do surprise inspections.

There is probably so much back-pocket payments and sneakiness going on we'd never know the half of it. There are thugs and crooks on both sides--trust no one.

312 posted on 09/25/2007 12:13:35 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: madison10

A great quote from CNN:

“David Wyss, chief economist for Standard & Poor’s, agreed that the impact on the overall economy will be somewhat limited, especially for a strike of only a week or two.

“Wyss estimated that a month long strike at GM could whack a quarter percentage point of growth in the gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the nation’s economic activity. That cost would double if the strike went into a second month. But he and other economists aren’t expecting a long-term strike.

“”It’s not like the 1950’s, when a strike at one of the automakers would put a real crimp in the economy,” he said. “The long-term damage, I’m less worried about. This is more of a short term issue.””

A quarter point is pretty much insignificant.

In other words - “Dear UAW; nobody cares about you any more. Please die. Thanks, the American People.”


313 posted on 09/25/2007 1:39:18 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
I was on strike once, and the union leaders told us to register for unemployment right away. We were not expected to need it but it would give the union more power at the bargaining table if everyone registered right away.

I think we were part of the UAW at the time. They had managed to capture a couple of publishers, along with the Museum of Modern Art. LOL

314 posted on 09/25/2007 2:52:29 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

Michiganders do not get unemployment when strike pay runs out...so there would be no point in registering.


315 posted on 09/25/2007 5:44:41 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Keep on walking.....


316 posted on 09/25/2007 5:45:35 PM PDT by donnab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

There are ways around that too. Cities pass laws saying you have to have a license to do a certain job. Then the licensing board becomes union thugs. They decide who gets a license and who doesn’t.


317 posted on 09/25/2007 5:55:12 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #318 Removed by Moderator

To: mamelukesabre

I agree that cities and states have many ways to restrain trade and competition. Politicians are easily moved with campaign contributions and single issue interest groups. The list is so long: autos, health insurance, movers, taxis, bond underwriting, ...


319 posted on 09/25/2007 6:30:05 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

Comment #320 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson