Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where are all the Ron Paul people coming from?
The Oregon Poll ^ | 9-20-7

Posted on 09/20/2007 6:40:58 PM PDT by Petronski

Over the last two days The Oregon Poll was seen by almost 400 "unique visitors," most of them in support of Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul. The majority of these people came from these two links on the web.

ronpaulforums.com

stormfront.org


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; banpaulspam; gaysforronpaul; keywordspammers; nazis; nazis4ronpaul; outlawjournalismcom; paulhaters; paulnuts; paulqaeda; potheadsforpaul; ronpaul; stormfront
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 581-583 next last
To: Petronski

buses?


161 posted on 09/20/2007 8:37:35 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
You're the one that's worried over a supposed kook candidate who supposedly can't win, not me.

***************

Paul is leaching money and attention from a viable candidate: Thompson. I have no idea why you are promoting his candidacy, as he is never going to be the nominee.

162 posted on 09/20/2007 8:40:30 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
The WOT issue made me question Paul’s sincerity on other issues. But yes, the WOT is the breaking issue. Even if you oppose it in theory, you don’t defund our troops who are being shot at. Paul has made that the central theme of his campaign, telling me that is the most important issue to him, as it is to me. The problem with this is we are on polar opposite ends of the spectrum in regards to this.

I probably agree with 75% of Paul’s positions, but the 25% disagreement is a deal breaker. Most of the other issues I mentioned are simply to point out how Paul says one thing but does another, like border security. He complains nothing is being done but when given the opportunity to do something about it, he voted against putting the Guard on the border because part of the bill also said it was to support stopping drug runners and he is against anything to do with the WOD- (according to Paulites, I haven’t seen Paul say this.)

The WOD is another issue for me where I disagree, but that isn’t a major issue in this election.

163 posted on 09/20/2007 8:41:47 PM PDT by mnehring (Thompson/Hunter 08 -- Fred08.com - The adults have joined the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
"Not as genuine" what?

If you could be a little more specific, you wouldn't risk having others try to interpret what you mean.

And if you didn't call him a big spender, just what was the point in listing the earmarks Dr. Paul submitted? That he was a hypocrite? Or that his earmarks kited up the fiscal budget?

Look, it's the oldest trick in the bag of political tricks to smear a candidate by association. Nixon was expert at it, as was LBJ. Your contending that it's some of Paul's kooky followers that got you started examining his record is transparently false. If anything, you already knew his record -- one part of it, his opposing the Iraq invasion -- and from that point forward looked for anything and everything that could paint him as someone the folks on this forum would dislike.

There are no doubt followers of your candidate who worship snakes. Most of us would think these types a bit kooky, but I'm not in the least concerned that Fred Thompson, if he were to become President ofthe United States, would invite them to do a worship service in the White House.

164 posted on 09/20/2007 8:43:54 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

So our national borders have little to do with national security?


165 posted on 09/20/2007 8:44:35 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
I’m sure he is for it, after all he talks about it a lot, however, when the vote came up to put the guard on the border, he voted no.

Even if it was for some point he was making about the War on Drugs, the result was a No vote.

He chose a symbolic vote (if the excuse is the WOD) over the substance of the result of the vote.

166 posted on 09/20/2007 8:45:54 PM PDT by mnehring (Thompson/Hunter 08 -- Fred08.com - The adults have joined the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
So our national borders have little to do with national security?

Yes or no?

167 posted on 09/20/2007 8:46:47 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Where in the world did you get that from?

Y’alls attempt to bait is cute, but I have to finish up this Flash project now.

168 posted on 09/20/2007 8:47:53 PM PDT by mnehring (Thompson/Hunter 08 -- Fred08.com - The adults have joined the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
“1. Defunding the troops in the middle of a war.
2. Opposing the WOT.
3. Blaming American and ‘blowback’ for the WOT.
4. Opposing putting the military on the border.
5. Opposing criminalizing the harming of a fetus in the commission of a crime.
6. Opposing laws that prevent taking a minor across state lines to get an abortion.
7. Supporting laws that protect child predator’s ‘privacy’.
8. Opposing the patriot act.
9. Playing semantic games with the Constitution, Art 1, Sect 8, Subsect 11, but ignoring Subsect 10 in regards to declarations of war.”

10. His moonbat conspiracy theory that there are plans to build a “superhighway through the United States from Mexico to Canada.”

11. In the debate citing he would follow the Constitution AND International Law.

169 posted on 09/20/2007 8:48:23 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks ( BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
So our national borders have little to do with national security? Yes or no?

If you could answer the above. Thanks.

170 posted on 09/20/2007 8:50:23 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
If you insist, YES. Seemed pretty obvious by my previous post but I guess I have to type it slower with fewer words.
171 posted on 09/20/2007 8:51:37 PM PDT by mnehring (Thompson/Hunter 08 -- Fred08.com - The adults have joined the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
So our national borders have little to do with national security?

National borders are necessary for national security, but not sufficient.

172 posted on 09/20/2007 8:52:26 PM PDT by Petronski (Cleveland Indians: AL Central -3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
There are no doubt followers of your candidate who worship snakes. Most of us would think these types a bit kooky, but I'm not in the least concerned that Fred Thompson, if he were to become President ofthe United States, would invite them to do a worship service in the White House.

Snake handlers might support Fred Thompson, but not because they secretly (or not so secretly, as the case may be) believe that Fred Thompson will support their snake-handling beliefs and advance their particular odd views. That is the difference between "kooks-who-happen-to-support-a-candidate" and "kooks-who-support-a-candidate-because-they-think-he-agrees-with-them." Hope that helps.

173 posted on 09/20/2007 8:53:15 PM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Et in Arcadia Ego; Jim Robinson
Above all, Dr Ron Paul is a truth-teller.
Another term for “Truther”.

I'm familiar with the PNAC. It is a think tank that Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and John Bolton, Bill Bennett, and many other highly respected individuals have all been members. Unfortunately, people like Ron Paul and his supporters believe it is a secret Jewish cabal, along with the Elders of Zion.

Between his anti-semitism and his newsletters saying things like “95 percent of the black males in Washington, D.C. are semi-criminal or entirely criminal”, it's no wonder he's built up such a fervent following of Neo-Nazis.

Ron Paul is the Lyndon Larouche of the 2008 Republican primary.
His supporters are a scourge on society with their blackshirt antics, crashing campaign events, disingenuously passing themselves off as legitimate concerned Republicans, and clogging our forum and polls with their filth.
I really wish they would go away, every last one of them.
They are no different than DUmmies and Kossacks, and most of the time are one and the same.
They are the natural enemies of FreeRepublic, and should be treated as such.
It is time we take the forum back. We didn't put up with it from Deaniacs, so why must we put up with it now that they've returned in the name of Ron Paul?

 
174 posted on 09/20/2007 8:53:42 PM PDT by counterpunch (“I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush”—Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Reynolds Corp announced free airfare to the “Tinfoil Hat Convention”.


175 posted on 09/20/2007 8:54:13 PM PDT by RavenATB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Ah, yes, then you agree that our national security depends on the security of our national borders...

Tell me, why does our current leadership, aid and abet, and actually encourage this massive violent invasion of our country?

176 posted on 09/20/2007 8:54:48 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Eh...are you sure they’re actually “people”?


177 posted on 09/20/2007 8:54:52 PM PDT by RavenATB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Ron Paul:
“ I also remember that I have sworn a solemn oath to uphold and protect the Constitution of the United States.

For me, upholding that oath is the first and best way to preserve and protect the blessed American way of life for our children and grandchildren.”

Nutjob defends the Constitution, freedom, and liberties. How kooky can one get? /s


178 posted on 09/20/2007 8:56:32 PM PDT by takenoprisoner (Can you hear that whistle blow? I can. I'm on the freedom train. Don't miss it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Tell me, why does our current leadership, aid and abet, and actually encourage this massive violent invasion of our country?

**************

What does that have to do with Ron Paul?

179 posted on 09/20/2007 8:56:50 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

Tell me, why does our current leadership, aid and abet, and actually encourage this massive violent invasion of our country?


180 posted on 09/20/2007 8:57:25 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 581-583 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson