[Clint N. Suhks]

“1. Defunding the troops in the middle of a war.
2. Opposing the WOT.
3. Blaming American and ‘blowback’ for the WOT.
4. Opposing putting the military on the border.
5. Opposing criminalizing the harming of a fetus in the commission of a crime.
6. Opposing laws that prevent taking a minor across state lines to get an abortion.
7. Supporting laws that protect child predator’s ‘privacy’.
8. Opposing the patriot act.
9. Playing semantic games with the Constitution, Art 1, Sect 8, Subsect 11, but ignoring Subsect 10 in regards to declarations of war.”

10. His moonbat conspiracy theory that there are plans to build a “superhighway through the United States from Mexico to Canada.”

11. In the debate citing he would follow the Constitution AND International Law.

[jmeagan]

****10. His moonbat conspiracy theory that there are plans to build a “superhighway through the United States from Mexico to Canada.”****

There is enough evidence to suggest that this is not a “moonbat” conspiracty theory.

****11. In the debate citing he would follow the Constitution AND International Law.****

No, He was saying that it against our constitution and that it is also against international law. RP wants to get out of almost all of the international organizations which we presently are part of. Nafta, Gatt, etc.

[AndreaThorn]

*****10. His moonbat conspiracy theory that there are plans to build a “superhighway through the United States from Mexico to Canada.”******

I was wary about this, but I’m starting to think that 2+2 does indeed equal 4, especially when I watched the Value Voters debate and saw that Phyllis Schafly appeared to be on board with the NAFTA / NAU line of thought.

She’s been around a long, long time and is a long respected leader of Republican women. I don’t agree with her (or anybody) on everything, but I do at least give her the courtesy of stopping and listening.

[Iwo Jima]

In the debate citing he would follow the Constitution AND International Law.

That's a lie.