Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NFL fines Belichick, takes Pats draft picks in spy-gate
CNN-SI ^ | Thursday September 13, 2007 | CNN-SI

Posted on 09/13/2007 6:18:32 PM PDT by indcons

New England coach Bill Belichick was fined the NFL maximum of $500,000 Thursday and the Patriots were ordered to pay $250,000 for spying on an opponent's defensive signals.

Commissioner Roger Goodell also ordered the team to give up next year's first-round draft choice if it reaches the playoffs and second- and third-round picks if it doesn't.

"This episode represents a calculated and deliberate attempt to avoid longstanding rules designed to encourage fair play and promote honest competition on the playing field," Goodell said in a letter to the Patriots.

The videotaping came to light after a camera was confiscated from Patriots video assistant Matt Estrella while he was on the New York Jets' sideline during New England's 38-14 win last Sunday at Giants Stadium. Goodell will not change the outcome of the game.

(Excerpt) Read more at sportsillustrated.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: belichick; football; nepatriots; nfl; pats; sports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: dfwgator

Good one, DFW. Post of the day.


21 posted on 09/13/2007 7:09:11 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (PUT AN END TO ORGANIZED CRIME. ABOLISH THE I.R.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: indcons

the patriots....they cheat....they are from Mass....

seems like a pattern.....

the nfl should have them forfet the game!!!


22 posted on 09/13/2007 7:09:22 PM PDT by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

I’m a Seahawk fan, but have rooted for the Pats in past. Never a fan of the organization and coach. I Like Brady.

If I understand correctly they have TWO first round picks, and get to keep at least one of them? The punishment is a joke. At a minimum there should be NO first round picks if you are going to punish them.

The money is irrelevant. They’ll make it back. The Pats are all about Championships in the present, and keeping one shot at what are considered among the best in the draft is too much. Sure, some of them turn out to be busts but you can’t know that for sure going in.

IMO, IF you want to lay down the law about cheating AND ignoring previous warnings you either strip them of all draft picks for a year (that cound set them back 2-3 years in the furture) OR strip them a game. The latter is the less extreme. You don’t necessarily give that game to the JETS, but as they are in the same division that restores the playing fild between them for division title and could affect the Pats playoff berth.


23 posted on 09/13/2007 7:11:29 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (A government that’s big enough to do everything for us is powerful enough to do anything to us.- F.T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
I'm no fan of the Patriots, but this is kinda ridiculous. What's the point of having rules against "spying" on coaches who send signals to their players in plain view of 80,000+ spectators at the game?
24 posted on 09/13/2007 7:17:52 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I was wondering if I was the only one who thought like this.


25 posted on 09/13/2007 7:36:51 PM PDT by packrat35 (PIMP my Senate. They're all a bunch of whores anyway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Here’s the question I have, what’s to say the Pats haven’t been sending a spy to tape a team & their signals in advance & then taping again in the current game to make sure they haven’t changed the signals? Belicheck is known as being a genius, if he would go this far to cheat, wouldn’t he be smart enough to go that far? Hmmmmmmm.


26 posted on 09/13/2007 7:37:45 PM PDT by Reno232
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Here’s another interesting concept:
“At one point we had a good drive going against the Patriots,” said one Lion who doesn’t want his name involved in this mess, but was willing to talk about it. “Mike Martz really had ‘em going. They were getting fouled up, lining up wrong, we were moving the ball. Then boom, the headset from the sidelines to the coaches’ booth goes out.

“Next possession we were moving the ball again and the same thing happened. You know it only takes two or three plays to mess up a drive.”
Matt Millen, the Lions’ GM, was talking to Bengals’ coach Marvin Lewis at the league meetings. He started telling him the story.

“Yeah, I know,” Lewis said. “Headset went out. It happened to me in Foxboro, too.”

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/dr_z/09/13/cheating/index.html?eref=T1

It’s a very interesting article.


27 posted on 09/13/2007 7:48:56 PM PDT by Reno232
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno232

come on, would anyone really feel the need to cheat against the Lions? I mean the Lions? Maybe a professional team but not the Lions.


28 posted on 09/13/2007 7:52:15 PM PDT by Dr Snide (vis pacem, para bellum - Prepare for war if you want peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: indcons

ROLLERBALL (aka-NFL) pays the freight. So, the networks don\\\’t care. But, compare this to how they freak about Barry Bonds \\\”CHEATING\\\”!

Oh yeah. Another NFL guy got crippled this week. Who cares? Barry Bonds cheated.


29 posted on 09/13/2007 8:01:02 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno232

Thanks for posting. The title of that article speaks volumes (”Smooth criminals”).


30 posted on 09/13/2007 8:10:32 PM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dr Snide

Ouch, but so true.


31 posted on 09/13/2007 8:10:35 PM PDT by packrat35 (PIMP my Senate. They're all a bunch of whores anyway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Yeah, but whats to prevent some team with some guys sitting
in the stands, with a mini-high-resolution camera, in their
hat, or in some type of clothing from doing the same,
and relaying the images to the coaches? The team was probably
gonna study the film, and see what hand signals caused
what reaction on the field...howzeabout sending those folks
to Iraq or Afghanistan or Pakistan to figure out the
signals of the terrorists?


32 posted on 09/13/2007 8:37:35 PM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
I think their little tricks won them a few games....when you see Brady come out and call the exact play that will work for that situation, and it does work, you have to wonder now how much help he had....

Pats are cheaters!

33 posted on 09/13/2007 9:35:11 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeharleyguy
They should have been forced to forfeit the game.

Because . . . ? The video tape was confiscated before half-time. The coaching staff never viewed the video tape. So, what exactly happened that nullifies their win? Getting caught video taping the other teams sidelines merits consequences that are appropriate. Your suggesting is not IMHO.

34 posted on 09/13/2007 9:39:03 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

You expect the other team to behave like gentlemen and win fairly, that’s why.

The focus should be on having the best talent on the field and a wise coach who prepares the team for what might be coming based on research, observation, and facts, rather than simply knowing what’s coming.


35 posted on 09/13/2007 10:18:16 PM PDT by scott7278 ("Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I would like to know what we are talking about.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: scott7278
If that were the case, then the NFL would never have allowed the game of football to approach that thin line that separates a competitive sport from a staged event.

So much about the game encourages it to be over-coached, over-analyzed, etc. Heck -- how silly is it that coaches can now communicate with their quarterback using a radio/headset? What respectable sport would allow such a thing?

36 posted on 09/14/2007 3:57:53 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII
And the answer ought to be every one in which they cheated.

I fail to understand how observing signals communicated in public constitutes cheating.

I realize there is a rule against taping & they broke that. But that aside, if you don't want someone seeing your communication then don't do it in the open.

37 posted on 09/14/2007 4:04:53 AM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Have to keep in mind, the videotaping is what the NFL *caught* them doing. There are much more serious cheating tactics strongly suspected. Putting mikes on defensive players to record audibles so the coaches can match them to actual plays ran on tape. Putting receivers in the defensive players helmets so they can hear the offensive play calls of the opponents and be communicated to by the coaches. Jamming the opponents radios.

Then the mundane like faking injuries to slow the opponent down and get free timeouts.

At the AFC Championship game last year, the Colts banned all video equipment from the field. Pretty clear indication they knew what the Patriots were about.

Have to wonder what kind of man would take honor in winning by cheating. How can Bob Kraft not fire Bilicheat? If he does not fire him, he is either complicit, condoning it or both.


38 posted on 09/14/2007 4:31:41 AM PDT by IamConservative (I could never be a liar; there's too much to remember.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeharleyguy
Fred Mortenson on ESPN said the same thing---that NE won three Super Bowls by a FG, and this calls into question all of them.

Look, I'm a Cowboys fan, and the three teams I hate the most are the three that have, or could, tie Dallas for Super Bowl victories, PITT, NE, and SF. So ensuring these SOBs never get another Super Bowl is fine with me.

But I keep going back to the fact that I don't know if it matters much. Vince Lombardi would virtually GIVE you his playbook, and still beat you.

39 posted on 09/14/2007 4:58:05 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dr Snide
come on, would anyone really feel the need to cheat against the Lions? I mean the Lions? Maybe a professional team but not the Lions.

Then why the Jets? Or the Packers?

The thing with cheaters is that they get hooked on it. The success of the cheat messes with their minds. Thinking you have a "secret edge" is powerful mojo, and over time, it erodes and supplants not just confidence in one's own ability to go it alone, but the original ability itself.

That Bellichik felt the need to cheat against the Jets says he's long since past the point where he knew for certain the line where talent and skill left off and his secret weapon began. IMHO, he's been doing this a long time.

40 posted on 09/14/2007 4:59:27 AM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson