Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curmudgeonII
And the answer ought to be every one in which they cheated.

I fail to understand how observing signals communicated in public constitutes cheating.

I realize there is a rule against taping & they broke that. But that aside, if you don't want someone seeing your communication then don't do it in the open.

37 posted on 09/14/2007 4:04:53 AM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: BearCub
. . . if you don't want someone seeing your communication then don't do it in the open.

Right. Football is one of those sports that allows free player substitution. I thought one of the purposes of changing a player or two on each play was to have one of them bring the play from the coach instead of having the coach signal a play.

43 posted on 09/14/2007 6:32:50 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: BearCub
I realize there is a rule against taping & they broke that. But that aside, if you don't want someone seeing your communication then don't do it in the open.

It's more of this crud that seems to permeate almost all professional sports....rules are made for someone other than the person who got caught. This is not only true in baseball, but also basketball and baseball. As far as I'm concerned, if you're not willing to play by the rules then get out of the game.

Your rather lame justification just helps to perpetuate this mind set.

49 posted on 09/14/2007 10:10:30 AM PDT by curmudgeonII (Dum spiro spero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson