Yes, if a definition of appropriate attire can be achieved and implemented to the liking of all.
Why is it an issue?
You don't have to "gawk" at her attire and some may "gawk" at her attire with zestful glee. So?
The only concerning factor I see is that she may acquire the interest of the from under the rock type perverts and bring on personal issues by her preference in attire.
That's still her personal problem not anyone else's.
Back to your question, one cannot dictate what is appropriate attire based upon personal mindset. Alas, must I bring up the word "anarchy" again?
(tic...tic..) I'm eagerly anticipating the "It's for the children" mantra.
BUMP!
EGPWS wrote: “I’m eagerly anticipating the “It’s for the children” mantra.”
As if the rights of the children don’t matter? How nice!
EGPWS wrote: “Yes, if a definition of appropriate attire can be achieved and implemented to the liking of all.”
Ah. So if we cannot get everyone to agree, then anything goes?
EGPWS wrote: “That’s still her personal problem not anyone else’s.”
Personal, as in private. This isn’t private. It’s public.
EGPWS wrote: “You don’t have to “gawk” at her attire and some may “gawk” at her attire with zestful glee. So?”
So, those of us who don’t want to see that should turn away and tune out? How far do we let community standards devolve before there’s nowhere left to turn?
“That’s still her personal problem not anyone else’s.”
Fine as long as the person in question is a young, pretty girl with a good figure.
Imagine a grossly fat, unattractive Hildebeast with a “I’m too sexy for myt shirt” attitude sitting near and hitting on you the WHOLE flight.
No thanks.