Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EGPWS

EGPWS wrote: “I’m eagerly anticipating the “It’s for the children” mantra.”

As if the rights of the children don’t matter? How nice!

EGPWS wrote: “Yes, if a definition of appropriate attire can be achieved and implemented to the liking of all.”

Ah. So if we cannot get everyone to agree, then anything goes?

EGPWS wrote: “That’s still her personal problem not anyone else’s.”

Personal, as in private. This isn’t private. It’s public.

EGPWS wrote: “You don’t have to “gawk” at her attire and some may “gawk” at her attire with zestful glee. So?”

So, those of us who don’t want to see that should turn away and tune out? How far do we let community standards devolve before there’s nowhere left to turn?


227 posted on 09/07/2007 12:36:05 PM PDT by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]


To: CitizenUSA
So, those of us who don’t want to see that should turn away and tune out?

No, we should pass a law requiring burka apparel for all women in public via appeasement mindset.

230 posted on 09/07/2007 12:40:00 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson