EGPWS wrote: “If THAT was her intent, she wouldn’t have passed security...”
Granted, but how little clothing is enough to get past security? And, if security DID stop her for trying to board in the nude, wouldn’t that be unreasonable. What’s her clothing have to do with the security of the aircraft? In fact, wouldn’t less or no clothing be better from a security standpoint?
The point I’m trying to make is that lines are always drawn. It’s a fact. Some people will always push the limits. That’s to be expected. However, there was a time when we didn’t let the deviants and the profane set the community standards for everyone else. Is it really to much to ask, in this day and age, for people to dress appropriately in public?
Yes, if a definition of appropriate attire can be achieved and implemented to the liking of all.
Why is it an issue?
You don't have to "gawk" at her attire and some may "gawk" at her attire with zestful glee. So?
The only concerning factor I see is that she may acquire the interest of the from under the rock type perverts and bring on personal issues by her preference in attire.
That's still her personal problem not anyone else's.
Back to your question, one cannot dictate what is appropriate attire based upon personal mindset. Alas, must I bring up the word "anarchy" again?
(tic...tic..) I'm eagerly anticipating the "It's for the children" mantra.