Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A frustrating evening (the debate)
Powerline ^ | 9/6/07 | Paul Mirengoff

Posted on 09/06/2007 9:21:16 AM PDT by pissant

I found the debate frustrating. Neither of the top tier candidates -- Giuliani and Romney -- had a good night. Giuliani took a big hit early over his 1994 statement welcoming illegal immigrants to New York. Thereafter, he seemed to answer most questions by referring to New York city crime statistics. He needs to diversify

Romney seemed defensive and, at times, evasive. His answers on Iraq were rambling. When the deputy sheriff in the restaurant called him out for not articulating an "end game" strategy, Romney was unable, I thought, to take advantage of the opportunity.

McCain did pretty well. At a minimum, as always, he answered the questions. I can conceive of him having a "surge" in New Hampshire as the "straight talk" candidate, particularly if Giuliani and Romney don't step it up.

Huckabee had another decent night, and I give points to anyone who takes on Ron Paul. But (as Romney pointed out) the "broken pottery" analogy in Iraq misses the most important reason for why we need to keep fighting -- namely the implications of the outcome on the war against terror. Huckabee also totally ducked the final question concerning what we should do if Iran continues on its present course towards becoming a nuclear power.

Duncan Hunter was, once again, the best of the rest.

Sam Brownback continues to be a huge disappointment. If the best he can do is channel Tom Friedman, it's clearly time for him to withdraw.

UPDATE: For what it's worth, Fox's focus group agreed with me that McCain did better than the two front-runners, and that Rudy talked too much about New York.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: duncanhunter; gopdebate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: EveningStar

Hunter is the MOST serious candidate. Serious about stopping illegal immigration, serious about victory in Iraq and in the WOT. Serious about confronting the communist chinese. Serious about buidling up our military. Serious about ending abortion. Serious about protecting the 2A 1000%. Serious about the re-industrialization of America. Serious about shitcanning political correctness and the war against God in the public square. Serious about tax relief. And serious about slamming the door on socialism.


41 posted on 09/06/2007 10:00:02 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

If I understand your post accurately, you don’t think our men should be nation building. Based on that premise, let me ask you a few questions.

Do you think we should have left Iraq as it was?

Was it okay for Iraq to kill off the Kurds?

Was it okay for Iraq to kill off people in it’s southern region also?

Was it okay for the Iraqi leadership to prevent all the girls from attending school.

Was it okay for the Hussein’s kids to torture and kill off Iraqis?

Was it okay for Hussein to pay out $25,000 to the families of suicide bombers in Israel?

Was it okay for Saddam to continue to stage his soldiers on the borders of neighbor states, as if preparing to invade? He had previously attacked four neighbor states, and had occupied one of them.

Was it okay for Hussein to cheer on those who carried out terrorism against us, and call for the destruction of the U.S.?

It would be impossible for anyone to claim there weren’t terrorists in Iraq, all the way up to and inclucing Hussein and his sons. So wasn’t it a good thing that we took them out?

I know there’s a claim that the U.S. shouldn’t be in this nation building business. Then who should be? In a world of expanding terrorism, who should and where should they decide to confront them?

Well, I guess that’s about it. In this shrinking world, just about any nation is a nation on our borders. I don’t think we can allow the terrorists to operate in a void, because they will fill that void. And if we just don’t want to take them on, then we just as well pull all our troups from around the world, all of our citizens too, and baracade our nation.

There goes trade. There goes travel. There goes our influence. There goes all the good we’ve achieved over the last 230 years. And sooner rather than later, there goes the homeland too. If the rest of the world is subject to evil taking over, then our nation couldn’t possibly stand.

If I misunderstood your comments, I appologize.


42 posted on 09/06/2007 10:00:08 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Bush never said it was a cakewalk. And even his speech on the aircraft carrier warned that the hard work was just beginning. Cheney did screw up by claiming the inusrgents were in their death throes though.


43 posted on 09/06/2007 10:02:18 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Wasn’t Iraq indicted in the first World Trade Center bombing? Didn’t the CIA shooter have ties to Iraq? Iraq has been, in part, responsible for several attacks on our homeland.

Wasn’t Iraq also responsible for an attempted assassination of the first President Bush?

44 posted on 09/06/2007 10:02:23 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is a FRAUD- No ifs, ands, or buts about it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
I know Adelman soured on the war after being an early supporter but IIRC he said it would be a cakewalk when selling the country on the invasion.
45 posted on 09/06/2007 10:02:26 AM PDT by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

I actually had a co-worker ask me yesterday, “So what’s so bad about illegal immigration?”

I said, “Um, it’s ILLEGAL,” wished her a nice evening, went home, and wrapped my head in duct tape.


46 posted on 09/06/2007 10:04:28 AM PDT by Xenalyte (Can you count, suckas? I say the future is ours . . . if you can count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

If the only debate on the Republican side is which of these two should truly be either President or Vice President, then I would certainly be happy. They would definitely still be attacked by both the MSM and “leftists” in general as being two old white guys who are also “too pro-war” and “too pro-military”. I have wanted both Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson to be the ‘08 GOP Presidential ticket for awhile, but there are also plenty of other GOP Presidential ticket possibilities that would work well for the GOP.


47 posted on 09/06/2007 10:06:02 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
I had a similar question, they followed up with the ‘its only a misdemeanor, and they pay taxes’ line.. I responded, by asking how they are able to pay taxes, where do they get the social security numbers? Where do they get their drivers’ licenses? Crossing the boarder illegally may only be a misdemeanor, but what they do to stay here consists of many felonies.(Identity theft, tax evasion, etc)
48 posted on 09/06/2007 10:07:01 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is a FRAUD- No ifs, ands, or buts about it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
The only other places I’ve seen that lie parrotted around is DU, Kos, etc. Maybe that’s where he got his material.

Why not...that's where he's getting his support these days.

49 posted on 09/06/2007 10:07:59 AM PDT by pgkdan (Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Hunter did well, but people will remember the Paul-Huck sparring. That was the only real debating going on. No candidate is going to be able to rely on this format to get his message out and win. They only show that these guys appear competent. And most did. You and I know the records of these guys, so we can detect the spinning (putting it politely). Hopefully, they will at least show the masses that the GOP guys are 1000% better than the idiots on the democratic stage.


50 posted on 09/06/2007 10:08:28 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: caltrop
I've found a column he wrote called "cakewalk", and at the bottom, here is this:

The writer was assistant to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld from 1975 to 1977, and arms control director under President Ronald Reagan.

30 years ago (25 years at the time he wrote the article) he worked under Rumsfeld, and that constitutes the Bush Admin saying Iraq would be a "cakewalk"?

51 posted on 09/06/2007 10:09:46 AM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I’ll remember Brit’s shock and snap at Paul saying basically that Al Qaeda is the authority on who or who isn’t allowed in Saudi Arabia.
52 posted on 09/06/2007 10:10:15 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is a FRAUD- No ifs, ands, or buts about it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

As for plans to do in the elder Bush, I believe you are right. With regard to the other two questions, I’m not sure. These are certainly good questions though. On the plan to do in the first President Bush, that alone should be grounds for taking action IMO. The others would just be icing on the cake.

Thanks.


53 posted on 09/06/2007 10:12:50 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Ron Paul never said Bush said it would be a cakewalk:

BTW Your quote is about the war on Terrorism, not Iraq. Made shortly after Sept 11th. Here are some administration quotes including the 'cakewalk' one on the Iraq War.

-------------------------------------------------------

Wolfowitz: A country that can really finance its own reconstruction Mar. 27, 2003 Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Defense Secretary There’s a lot of money to pay for this that doesn’t have to be U.S. taxpayer money, and it starts with the assets of the Iraqi people…and on a rough recollection, the oil revenues of that country could bring between $50 and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years…We’re dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon.” (more)

(my comment): He is right. We should have left and let them rebuild with out Taxpayer assistance or troops on the ground. They have enough resources.

Perle: days or weeks -- this will be a short war Mar. 25, 2003 Richard Perle, Chairman of the Defense Policy Board I can't tell you exactly how many days or how many weeks. But by historical standards, this will be a short war. (more) My comment: again he was right, too bad we took on nation building.

Cheney: In weeks rather than months Mar. 16, 2003 Dick Cheney "My belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators. . . . I think it will go relatively quickly, . . . [in] weeks rather than months." --on NBC's Meet the Press

My comment: again he was right....too bad we took on nation building.

Rumsfeld: I Doubt Six Months Feb. 7, 2003 Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense "It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months." —to U.S. troops in Aviano, Italy: (more)

My comment: again he was right....too bad we took on nation building.

Rumsfeld: Under $50 billion Jan. 10, 2003 Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense “Well, the Office of Management and Budget, has come up come up with a number that's something under $50 billion for the cost. How much of that would be the U.S. burden, and how much would be other countries, is an open question.”

My comment: Spot on. It only cost that much to get rid of saddam.....too bad we took on nation building.

Rumsfeld: Five days or five months, but it certainly isn't going to last longer Nov. 15, 2002 Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense "The idea that it's going to be a long, long, long battle of some kind I think is belied by the fact of what happened in 1990," he said on an Infinity Radio call-in program. "Five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly isn't going to last any longer than that." (more)

My comment: ....too bad we took on nation building.

Adelman: Liberating Iraq would be a cakewalk Feb. 13, 2002 Ken Adelman "I believe demolishing Hussein's military power and liberating Iraq would be a cakewalk.” - Washington Post

My comment: Liberating Iraq is and was a cakewalk, too bad we took on Nation building, they could rebuild themselves and we should have let them. I don't give 2 craps about them as long as they have no military threat toward us and saddam is dead.

54 posted on 09/06/2007 10:12:53 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

LOL


55 posted on 09/06/2007 10:15:40 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Besides Giuliani's outrageous comments on illegal immigrants, the other BIG OUTRAGE (Paul doesn't even count anymore)--was Rudy using the "CLINTON DEFENSE" for his train-wreck of a personal life.

When the importance of a President 'setting an example' for the rest of the country came up in a question from the diner,,,,

Rudy commented that he should be judged by his job performance in office, and not by his private life. Geeee,,,,,is it just me, or have we heard that lame, cop-out 'defense' before?....lol

56 posted on 09/06/2007 10:16:56 AM PDT by stockstrader (We need a conservative nominee who will UNITE the Party, not a liberal one who will DIVIDE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

Wow. You didn’t even slap her?


57 posted on 09/06/2007 10:18:06 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
I’m glad you agree then, the only person who said it would be a cakewalk was Aldeman, who happened to work for Rumsfield 30 years ago.. the rest are pretty open ended comments that you choose to read cakewalk into.
58 posted on 09/06/2007 10:19:48 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is a FRAUD- No ifs, ands, or buts about it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Oh, she’s not worth slapping. She’s a reflexive liberal - she’s been programmed to be that way. She has no freakin’ clue why she “thinks” what she allegedly thinks. She is innocent of logic.


59 posted on 09/06/2007 10:19:49 AM PDT by Xenalyte (Can you count, suckas? I say the future is ours . . . if you can count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
Ron Paul never said Bush said it would be a cakewalk:

Here is what Paul said last night (Debate Transcript):

PAUL: The people who say there will be a bloodbath are the ones who said it will be a cakewalk or it will be a slam dunk, and that it will be paid for by oil. Why believe them? They've been wrong on everything they've said.

If he wasn't talking about the Bush Admin, who WAS he talking about???

60 posted on 09/06/2007 10:20:57 AM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson