Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will President Bush Bomb Iran?
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 9-1-2007 | Tim Shipman

Posted on 09/01/2007 6:10:03 PM PDT by blam

Will President Bush bomb Iran?

By Tim Shipman in Washington
Last Updated: 12:17am BST 02/09/2007Page 1 of 3

In a nondescript room, two blocks from the American Capitol building, a group of Bush administration staffers is gathered to consider the gravest threat their government has faced this century: the testing of a nuclear weapon by Iran.

President Bush dramatically stepped up his war of words with the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

The United States, no longer prepared to tolerate the risk that Iranian nuclear weapons will be used against Israel, or passed to terrorists, has already launched a bombing campaign to destroy known Iranian nuclear sites, air bases and air defence sites. Iran has retaliated by cutting off oil to America and its allies, blockading the Straits of Hormuz, the Persian Gulf bottleneck, and sanctioned an uprising by Shia militias in southern Iraq that has shut down 60 per cent of Iraq's oil exports.

The job of the officials from the Pentagon, the State Department, and the Departments of Homeland Security and Energy, who have gathered in an office just off Massachusetts Avenue, behind the rail terminus, Union Station, is to prevent a spike in oil prices that will pitch the world's economy into a catastrophic spin.

The good news is that this was a war game; for those who fear war with Iran, the less happy news is that the officials were real. The simulation, which took four months, was run by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank with close links to the White House. Its conclusions, drawn up last month and seen by The Sunday Telegraph, have been passed on to military and civilian planners charged with drawing up plans for confronting Iran.

News that elements of the American government are working in earnest on how

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airstrikes; bomb; bush; iran; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Judith Anne

I think this is a planned leak—a warning as to what is in store

Give Iran something to think about


21 posted on 09/01/2007 6:35:34 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam

when is inauguration day??? hee hee


22 posted on 09/01/2007 6:35:45 PM PDT by proudmilitarymrs (It's not immigration, it's an invasion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

“Will President Bush Bomb Iran?”

Obviously the wrong headline. Should be:

“Will Bush Convert Iran To Glass Factory”

Sounds much more pro-business that way.


23 posted on 09/01/2007 6:38:19 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Will President Bush bomb Iran?

In the event that the President does order air strikes on Iran I hope these air strikes are so complete that there is not a military target left standing.Not even an outhouse.

I just hope that once these attacks get going the President doesn’t pull the plug prematurely,like we have done in the past. I would like to see a Dresden or Tokyo.Nothing Left standing.

24 posted on 09/01/2007 6:44:42 PM PDT by puppypusher (The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The latest polls show that just one in five Americans would support the bombing of Iran now, but about half would do so if their government considered it necessary: clearly a position from which Mr Bush could build a case for war. Three out of four voters want to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Sorta like, "I wanna get very, very rich right away, but I don't want to work, steal or take any risks."

25 posted on 09/01/2007 6:47:26 PM PDT by Sal (My "good" Senator Kyl exposed himself as a Grand Betrayer, corrupt to the core!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

What would Hillary do ?


26 posted on 09/01/2007 6:48:10 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

"X" marks the spot


27 posted on 09/01/2007 6:49:10 PM PDT by BigFinn (Islam= a caustic blend of paganism and twisted Bible stories resulting in mayhem and death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

ARE YOU BACK POSTING? WELCOME BACK!


28 posted on 09/01/2007 6:49:44 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

And I am sure it will give Iran’s military leaders something to ponder

They saw what happened to Saddam’s

A military coup be cool


29 posted on 09/01/2007 6:52:18 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sal
Sorta like, “I wanna get very, very rich right away, but I don’t want to work, steal or take any risks.”
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

You have perfectly tagged the current “Non-Greatest Generation”. They want their BMW's to be safe but do not have the backbone to take the action to secure that safety. Should we blitzkrieg and then Tora! Tora! Tora!?

30 posted on 09/01/2007 7:00:57 PM PDT by CHEE (You don't have to practice to be miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: blam
Given our increasing isolation over Iraq, we need more than some warm fuzzies from Sarkozy before we bite this off.

Bush really does not have much time. It would be an unthinkable and despicable act, IMO, to do this much after the beginning of his last year, absent a clear emergency. You don't start an optional war and hand it off to a likely unsupportive successor unless you are truly forced into it.

It is good to be right but, unfortunately, it is also necessary to have some reasonable level of support both at home and aborad.

(I think we had sufficient support for the Iraq war...leadership does not mean waiting until EVERYbody is on board. But the "coaliton" -- derided as it was -- is now in tatters.)

31 posted on 09/01/2007 7:01:11 PM PDT by SergeiRachmaninov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Yes, I think this could happen.

I voted for Bush twice, and, have been angry with him many times; especially on the immigration issue. However, I believe he is a man of conscience, and will do what he truly thinks is best for this country.

What’s more, I don’t think he gives a whit about his legacy once he is out of office and back home on his ranch in Crawford. I suspect we will see very little of him... If I am right about this, he is the one to rid us of the people and countries who most want to harm and/or annihilate us.


32 posted on 09/01/2007 7:05:15 PM PDT by msmagoo54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Toppling this regime will be like cuttung the head off of a snake. GWB will need to finish them off before the 2008 elections


33 posted on 09/01/2007 7:08:50 PM PDT by RocketJsqurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RocketJsqurl

I believe you are right, and Bush is the one to do it. Nobody else has the guts.


34 posted on 09/01/2007 7:15:23 PM PDT by msmagoo54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: msmagoo54

Not likely, he seems to have lost the post 9-11 fire-in-the-belly. If he hasn’t, he sure doesn’t show it - and showing it is half the battle. IMHO


35 posted on 09/01/2007 7:19:15 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

Warning and talking tough and then doing nothing is worse than not talking at all


36 posted on 09/01/2007 7:29:51 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

We’ll have to disagree on this. I believe that not showing it helps to win the battle.


37 posted on 09/01/2007 7:34:35 PM PDT by msmagoo54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: blam

My crystal ball says this can gets kicked down the street to the next administration.


38 posted on 09/01/2007 7:45:36 PM PDT by Nachoman (My guns and my ammo, they comfort me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman

You very well may be right; but, I hope not.


39 posted on 09/01/2007 7:52:06 PM PDT by msmagoo54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: blam

Related:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1889805/posts
Duncan Hunter Calls for Iran Strike Soon

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1890015/posts
Pentagon ‘three-day blitz’ plan for Iran


40 posted on 09/01/2007 7:54:20 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson