Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRANSCRIPT: Police Interview With Sen. Larry Craig
ABC News ^ | 08/30/2007

Posted on 08/30/2007 2:48:08 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 401-417 next last
To: Responsibility2nd

All I can say is—this guy’s a sneak-weasel. If a cop falsely accused me of something like this, I’d be outraged and want to speak to a lawyer immediately.


341 posted on 08/31/2007 11:33:56 AM PDT by Antoninus (The greatest gifts parents can give their children are siblings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick
Simple logic deduction dear Perkick.

No psychic ability required.

Do you generally advocate going through cop's garbage cans too - or is this an exception?

342 posted on 08/31/2007 11:34:16 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: VxH

>>Simple logic

Should be:

Simple logical


343 posted on 08/31/2007 11:35:53 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Whats with al the “1,1 1,1,1 1,1 entries?

Should they be “I”s?


344 posted on 08/31/2007 11:38:48 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VxH

If his behavior is questionable he deserves the same treatment any citizen would get. Cops aren’t above the law just because of that badge.

You never did answer.

What crime was committed?


345 posted on 08/31/2007 11:39:58 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: milford421
[But that wasn’t the charge was it.]

Lewd conduct IS within the scope of offense to which the ex-Senator pleaded guilty.

346 posted on 08/31/2007 11:42:45 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Good question.

That’s the way I was reading it. As “I”.

As in maybe he was stuttering and stammering.


347 posted on 08/31/2007 11:43:06 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: VxH

“Lewd conduct IS within the scope of offense to which the ex-Senator pleaded guilty.”

Had the cop had him on lewd conduct, he would have charged him with it.

I asked you before if you had any information on the background of Craig regarding any incidents like this...told you I was open to information.

Do you have any?


348 posted on 08/31/2007 11:45:10 AM PDT by milford421 (U.N. OUT OF U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick
[What crime was committed?]

The one that he pleaded guilty to.

Embarrassing, embarrassing...

349 posted on 08/31/2007 11:45:52 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: Screamname
What is worse is denying his nature and living a lie like Tom Cruise, John Travolta and Jodie Foster do.

Taking it up the cr@pper or looking for sex in a public restroom--neither are part of anyone's "nature." Nature did not design the anus to accept someone's penis. Period. Basic anatomy and physiology will tell you that.

Refraining from perverse butt-piratical activity is no more denying nature than refraining from adultery, pedophilia, or crack cocaine. Unless you think it's part of people's nature to be philanderers, chicken hawks, or druggies?
350 posted on 08/31/2007 11:46:09 AM PDT by Antoninus (The greatest gifts parents can give their children are siblings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: shield
This cop has other reports about HIS behavior!!!

What's this--the 'nuts and sluts' defense?

Please.

The GOP party hacks working overtime are not (I pray) going to save this guy. If Craig is allowed to stay on, he's going to be used as a stick to beat the GOP for being the hypocrites that they will have shown themselves to be.
351 posted on 08/31/2007 11:48:05 AM PDT by Antoninus (The greatest gifts parents can give their children are siblings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: tracer
They all pleaded "guilty" to charges other than those related to trying to pick up "friends" in bathrooms at the airport.
Plea bargains happen all the time. It sounds like a gift from the DA's office to help some troubled people get their lives back in order.
The likely class action will be extremely sweet to behold....
I doubt it. I'd imagine the others want to forget it ever happened. They are probably more concerned that the media will start looking at the public records of their case. It wouldn't take a lot of work at the courthouse to get them.
352 posted on 08/31/2007 11:48:39 AM PDT by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: VxH

Disorderly? Pretty much the equivalent of a bar fight or being too loud...LOL

It was not what a lot of people are trying to make it out to be. But you know that, dontcha?


353 posted on 08/31/2007 11:49:10 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: tracer; VxH
next you'll subpoena my IP address so you can have me arrested on aggravated harassment charges over my electronic threat to the cop in this case.

i suppose everytime a gun-nut on this forum threatens anyone who would come take their guns, you two take those threats seriously and begrudge them their typing. relax. it's america. we can say those things.

354 posted on 08/31/2007 11:51:31 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

After listening to the tapes while reading the transcript, does anyone else think the Officer acted too prematurely? Shouldn’t he have at least waited for some sort of verbal exchange (note I said “verbal” not “oral” :) . . ahem . . .or some attempted movement from one of the stalls to the next? At what point does it become obvious what Craig’s intent was?

Doesn’t undercover in prostitution cases have to wait until there is some sort of solicitation (discussion regarding money) before an arrest is made? Just merely pulling over and talking with a hooker isn’t enough. Eyeballing her, flirting with her, etc.

Even if Craig was following the behavior associated with restroom homosexuality, it sure seems to me like there should’ve been more words or behavior to ensure that illegal acts were indeed going to take place. Then the Officer could’ve made his arrest.


355 posted on 08/31/2007 11:54:06 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milford421

[Had the cop had him on lewd conduct, he would have charged him with it.]

You haven’t presented any evidence to support that assumption.

I think the operation and the charged / pleaded offense, served their purpose without clogging up the court system.


356 posted on 08/31/2007 11:55:15 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

the point of the hand and foot gestures is that no verbalization is necessary! this is a public restroom and talking would kinda ruin the whole secrecy thing.


357 posted on 08/31/2007 11:56:30 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick

[a bar fight or being too loud...]

Or obscene conduct.


358 posted on 08/31/2007 11:58:49 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
[everytime a gun-nut on this forum threatens anyone]
...
[it’s america. we can say those things.]

I believe you’ll find that “fighting words” are not covered by the 1st amendment. Neither are terrorist threats.

359 posted on 08/31/2007 12:04:46 PM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: milford421
I asked you before if you had any information on the background of Craig regarding any incidents like this...told you I was open to information.
The question wasn't directed to me but I'll give it a shot. 1982 was in the pre-internet era so records are hard to come by. This is a 1982 newscast about a sex with pages scandal and comments from Craig.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RntWGPEjoo&mode=related&search=

I think this incident is where the rumors started.

360 posted on 08/31/2007 12:10:01 PM PDT by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 401-417 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson