1 posted on
08/29/2007 9:24:16 AM PDT by
Kuksool
To: All
Question for Frepperville - If illegal immigration is such an important issue and Tancredo is a true conservative, then why does he trail poorly against Hillary?
2 posted on
08/29/2007 9:25:52 AM PDT by
Kuksool
(RATS occupy Red States due free passes by conservatives)
To: Kuksool
Maybe his “Nuke Mecca” comment didn’t sit well with the sane?
3 posted on
08/29/2007 9:26:00 AM PDT by
ASA Vet
To: Kuksool; ejonesie22; prairiebreeze; Petronski; Politicalmom
Only Ron Paul fares worse against Clinton than Tancredo, trailing her 34% to 49% in a July survey.I'm curious what the Rudybots will have to say about that...
4 posted on
08/29/2007 9:29:28 AM PDT by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: Kuksool
Tom Tancredo does not really want to be president. He just wants to make sure that everybody running for president talks about immigration.
He is a "Message Candidate."
If he did want to be president he would be campaigning differently.
13 posted on
08/29/2007 9:33:26 AM PDT by
elizabetty
(Was it Dolly Madison or Dolli Madison? First Ladies should not end their name with "I")
To: Kuksool
Tancredo was on Fox & Friends a few weeks ago. He looked like he slept in the suit he was wearing, tie was askew, top shirt button, unbuttoned, rumpled and wrinkled, and hardly looked anything like presidential.
As many campaigns as I have watched and worked, the bottom line for any of them has been, look good even when you are trashed. Appearance is everything.
14 posted on
08/29/2007 9:36:53 AM PDT by
Pistolshot
(Every woman, who can, should learn to shoot, and carry a gun.)
To: Kuksool
I am not and have never been a Tancredo supporter. In fact I’ve been a critic of him. But at this point in the election process all polling is about is name recognition. Tancredo has a little higher negatives than some other 3rd tier candidates so that accounts for him trailing Brownback et,al.
24 posted on
08/29/2007 9:53:35 AM PDT by
Artemis Webb
(RON PAUL: "It will be a little bit better now with the democrats now in charge of oversight ")
To: Kuksool; arnoldpalmerfan; M203M4; Millee; EternalVigilance; rodguy911; Reaganwuzthebest; ...
On Jimmy Carter’s US School Board:
"There is no constitutional role of the federal government to have the Department of Education. I don’t believe we should have the U.S. Department of Education."
- Tom Tancredo
Click for more on Tancredo on the issues.
Join TEAM TANCREDO
FREEPMAIL ME TO BE ADDED TO THIS TANCREDO ’08 PING LIST
37 posted on
08/30/2007 6:05:42 AM PDT by
SittinYonder
(Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson