Yeah, you're right, I should just support one of the pre-approved establishment flunkies who won't address the real issues.
Even if your intentions are pure, you are supporting someone designed to split off a small margin of conservative voters that are hard core libretardian in their views. The ones who put the core of libretarianism above their willingness to see the bigger picture.
Would you rather have Paul run as a Republican or as a Libertarian? Seriously. You folks criticize Paul with the old libertarian BS but do you realize how fricking screwed the GOP would be if he ran as an independent? Hillary might as well start buying new drapes and furniture for the WH.
His support is x% people like you and y% moveon people or people of their ilk. You are being hoodwinked into thinking RP has a farts chance in a hurricane in order to negate your vote.
His support comes mainly from decent folks who are tired of politicians BSing them all the time. There's no hoodwinking or con game here. Give me a break.
Get a friggin clue. You xrs and being pulled around by a nose ring by a bunch of yrs uber geek libs who have real and not figurative nose rings.
There you go again, insinuating that Paul supporters are a bunch of basement, skater-boy dwellers spending their lives online. You guys are all mad because there are people out there who are interested in the real truth, for a change.
There you go again, insinuating that Paul supporters are a bunch of basement, skater-boy dwellers spending their lives online.
Insinuate????? I state it as fact, except you forgot the most important part:
STONER “basement, skater-boy dwellers spending their lives online” who are at this point looking quite a bit brighter than lemmings like yourself.
On second thought: Either lemming or one of them.
He just turned 72, do you think he looks presidential?
I'm an Independent, so you all vote carefully in the primaries. >:-}