Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Violent Home Intrusion Fatal to (14 y/o) Teen, Pine Bluff police say.
Arkansas Democrat Gazette ^ | 26 AUG 07 | dcbryan1

Posted on 08/26/2007 9:13:40 AM PDT by DCBryan1

Edited on 08/26/2007 9:19:36 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
Bad guys 0, Citizens Defending their homes from violent criminal attack, 2.
1 posted on 08/26/2007 9:13:43 AM PDT by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain; Dangerous Dave; Joe Brower; bang_list
“I think the boy had criminal intent, but he just got the raw end of the deal,” said Sgt. Greg C. Holland of the Pine Bluff Police Department.

Me thinks the cops should be giving both howeowners and business owners medals for ridding the community of defective products that are returned to the manufacturer.

2 posted on 08/26/2007 9:16:04 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims.Kill all child molesters RFN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Great job home and shop owners, keep up the good work.


3 posted on 08/26/2007 9:16:36 AM PDT by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
Highly unlikely that that punk would have turned out to be a brain surgeon so it’s no great loss.No loss at all,actually.
4 posted on 08/26/2007 9:20:23 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
“I think the boy had criminal intent, but he just got the raw end of the deal,” said Sgt. Greg C. Holland of the Pine Bluff Police Department.

He thinks the boy had criminal intent ?? That is just one dumb statement. The headline is also misleading...my first impression was that the boy was living in the home and was a victim of the invasion.

Anyway, I agree with some of the other posters...less trash to deal with...

5 posted on 08/26/2007 9:22:24 AM PDT by Mopp4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

He saved the boy from a life of crime.


6 posted on 08/26/2007 9:23:37 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mopp4
“I think the boy had criminal intent, but he just got the raw end of the deal,”

This should read, "I think the boy had criminal intent, and he got what he deserved."

There, much better....

7 posted on 08/26/2007 9:24:48 AM PDT by dirtbiker (I tried to see things from the liberal point-of-view, but I couldn't get my head up my a$$...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mopp4

> “I think the boy had criminal intent”
Are you kidding. That’s like saying you might get wet while standing in the rain.
Of course he had criminal intent. Now he’s got composting intent.


8 posted on 08/26/2007 9:26:13 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Before the government can give you a dollar it must first take it from another American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Another child taken by by gun violence.


9 posted on 08/26/2007 9:26:59 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

I thought this thread had already been posted, with many replies. I left the computer, went upstairs, took a shower, came back down, and the thread is still here, but with different replies! WTF?!


10 posted on 08/26/2007 9:29:11 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

You really needed to put..... /sarc..... after that statement.


11 posted on 08/26/2007 9:29:47 AM PDT by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

“I think the boy had criminal intent, but he just got the raw end of the deal,”

***

Huh? It’s the homeowner in the house who got the wrong end of that deal.

And by the way, he’s not a boy. Once you pick up a loaded firearm and start shooting at people, you aren’t a kid anymore.

Sorry, no tears being shed by me for that punk.


12 posted on 08/26/2007 9:30:00 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: umgud
Another child FUTURE MURDERER taken by gun violence. SELF-DEFENSE.

There - fixed it.

13 posted on 08/26/2007 9:31:00 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

A smart homeowner is an armed homeowner. Guns are the life insurance policy that pay off before you die.


14 posted on 08/26/2007 9:38:18 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

**SNIFF**..I love a happy ending..


15 posted on 08/26/2007 9:40:47 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (I'm a Patriot Guard Rider - www.patriotguard.org for more info..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mopp4
He thinks the boy had criminal intent ?? That is just one dumb statement.

After reading the article, I'm not sure who is dumber -- the reporter or the police spokesperson.

16 posted on 08/26/2007 9:52:28 AM PDT by vox humana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

>>Bad guys 0, Citizens Defending their homes from violent criminal attack, 2.<<

That may not be enough. Somebody is likely responsible for this kid and has failed.


17 posted on 08/26/2007 9:55:23 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Armed citizen saves taxpayers cost of trials and imprisoning young DemoThug for a lifetime of crimes.


18 posted on 08/26/2007 9:55:59 AM PDT by DGHoodini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
What a terrible headline. I can't tell if it was the home invader or resident who died. Better headline: "Lack of Supervision Proves Fatal to Fatherless Teen" (Just a guess about the fatherless part. I'm taking bets.)

At least the story had a happy ending, as much as the LSM tries to hide the fact.

It'd be ironic if the boy's "father" [sperm donor] crawled out from under a rock to sue the homeowner.

19 posted on 08/26/2007 10:03:42 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pallis
A smart homeowner is an armed homeowner. Guns are the life insurance policy that pay off before you die.

I'm not recommending this for everyone, but I have three cans of high-octane LEO-grade pepper spray placed around the apartment.

The reasons are (a) we're currently in an apartment and (b) wifey is not a huge gun person. She doesn't mind me having a few, but they're not her cup of tea. And one always thinks about the potential problem of sheetrock walls on the hallway side, with possible bullet penetration (the floor, ceiling, and three other walls are concrete).

Near the front door is a huge 16 oz can, larger than the bear sprays I used to carry, and about the size you might have seen used by Dog and his bounty hunting family.

There's a 3 oz fogger on the bedroom nightstand (also a 70 lumen xenon flashlight and some other goodies), and a 2 oz streaming OC unit near my desk. Finally, there are a couple small caliber revolvers laying around.

It would be "better" to have a Rem 870 12g Police and a Ruger Alaskan in .454 Casull laying around, but not at all practical. Or necessary, since the last incident around here was a parking lot purse snatching about 3 years ago.

If any of you are looking at OC (red pepper) sprays for home or personal use, I did some intensive research and the "best" LEO-grades seem to be Sabre, First Defense (go for the new X2), and Fox. Avoid everything else, there are no validated standards for this industry in terms of potency, quality of ingredients, or propellants.

20 posted on 08/26/2007 10:25:35 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson