To: DCBryan1
“I think the boy had criminal intent, but he just got the raw end of the deal,” said Sgt. Greg C. Holland of the Pine Bluff Police Department. He thinks the boy had criminal intent ?? That is just one dumb statement. The headline is also misleading...my first impression was that the boy was living in the home and was a victim of the invasion.
Anyway, I agree with some of the other posters...less trash to deal with...
5 posted on
08/26/2007 9:22:24 AM PDT by
Mopp4
To: Mopp4
“I think the boy had criminal intent, but he just got the raw end of the deal,”This should read, "I think the boy had criminal intent, and he got what he deserved."
There, much better....
7 posted on
08/26/2007 9:24:48 AM PDT by
dirtbiker
(I tried to see things from the liberal point-of-view, but I couldn't get my head up my a$$...)
To: Mopp4
> “I think the boy had criminal intent”
Are you kidding. That’s like saying you might get wet while standing in the rain.
Of course he had criminal intent. Now he’s got composting intent.
8 posted on
08/26/2007 9:26:13 AM PDT by
BuffaloJack
(Before the government can give you a dollar it must first take it from another American)
To: Mopp4
He thinks the boy had criminal intent ?? That is just one dumb statement.After reading the article, I'm not sure who is dumber -- the reporter or the police spokesperson.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson