Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/21/2007 3:59:41 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Man50D

Our local meteorolist stood up and discounted this man made global warming crap, too.


2 posted on 08/21/2007 4:02:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...


FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH



3 posted on 08/21/2007 4:03:31 AM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008 -- talk about it >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Trouble is, it now has a political-religious following. It will take a generation to get rid of this one, and by God’s grace, we may hope not to replace it with yet another “global cooling/coming ice age” scare.


4 posted on 08/21/2007 4:04:03 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent. ALWAYS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

I need to find a Global warming Denier T shirt to wear.

Vast Right Wing Conspiracy Global Warming Denier.

VRWCGWD


5 posted on 08/21/2007 4:05:25 AM PDT by listenhillary (millions crippled by the war on poverty....but we won't pull out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
"Carbon dioxide is 0.000383 of our atmosphere by volume (0.038 percent)," said meteorologist Joseph D'Alea, the first director of meteorology at The Weather Channel and former chief of the American Meteorological Society's Committee on Weather Analysis and Forecast.

"Only 2.75 percent of atmospheric CO2 is anthropogenic in origin. The amount we emit is said to be up from 1 percent a decade ago. Despite the increase in emissions, the rate of change of atmospheric carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa remains the same as the long term average (plus 0.45 percent per year)," he said. "We are responsible for just 0.001 percent of this atmosphere. If the atmosphere was a 100-story building, our anthropogenic CO2 contribution today would be equivalent to the linoleum on the first floor."

I thought "scientists" were behind the belief in global warming. Even the simplest student should be able to tell from those numbers that CO2 is irrelevant in the warming of the earth.

6 posted on 08/21/2007 4:05:45 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

My energy consumption at work is down 15% since April due to mild temperatures. I am looking out the window at yet another 65 degree August day in the New York Metro Area.

The people who decide on my bonus are all big GW believers, so they think I’m some kind of Energy Conservation GOD!


7 posted on 08/21/2007 4:05:48 AM PDT by gridlock (You’ll never grow old with Hillary-Care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
This is really all very basic. All the liberal assumptions about global warming say that we have reached " a tipping point" but in Nature there is no such thing. Natural system are non-linear dynamic systems which revert to the mean. CO2 rises, which causes more tree and algae growth, which then lowers CO2, etc.

There is really nothing very mysterious about it. The entire "climate change" movement is really just bad science, and foolish people.

8 posted on 08/21/2007 4:16:48 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

If you actually read the “sizzling paper” referred to by this WorldNet report — congratulations! It is highly technical. However, as far as I can tell from a quick reading, it looks very good. Not exactly “sizzling,” though.

The paper by Schwarz brings up some fundamental points about global heat-balance.

There is no doubt that the Global Warming mania has become an industry for grant-writers. You end up with a host of happy researchers working in rather limited areas, all dining off of the proceeds of grants to study “global warming.” Naturally, they must pay lip-service to the alleged threat. Just how much they really believe, we will never know until the movement collapses. It reminds me of all those Chinese who claimed to worship Mao, and the New York Times (in the person of James Reston) proclaimed that no one opposed Mao, and that their reverence was impressive to a good “Presbyterian.” Later, of course, we found that almost no one actually loved Mao, but they are too embarrassed now to lose face by admitting how loathsome he was, and that they all went along out of ignorance or fear.

Global warming reminds me of some of the feeding frenzies of the past, such as the great threat of acid rain. And what about the danger of radon? No one talks about these now unfashionable bugaboos. There actually are some environmental threats, but surely we should be able to tell the real from the unreal. For example, none of the fears I just mentioned are as dangerous as smoking, or human sexual behavior (which is responsible for the spread of AIDS). There is also human political behavior, which has probably caused more harm than all the environmental threats we can imagine.


11 posted on 08/21/2007 4:49:50 AM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
This is an excellent article. I know WND has been criticized sometimes on FreeRepublic, but I consider it an excellent source. I don't expect a perfect oracle. Here is a good quote:

"Carbon dioxide is 0.000383 of our atmosphere by volume (0.038 percent)," said meteorologist Joseph D'Alea. "Only 2.75 percent of atmospheric CO2 is anthropogenic in origin. ...."We are responsible for just 0.001 percent of this atmosphere. If the atmosphere was a 100-story building, our anthropogenic CO2 contribution today would be equivalent to the linoleum on the first floor."

Carbon dioxide makes up 96% of the atmosphere on Venus, but it is negligible on earth and is mostly emitted or absorbed by the oceans based upon ocean temperature.
13 posted on 08/21/2007 4:53:06 AM PDT by ChessExpert (Climate change for 4.5 billion years and counting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

It’s too late! All of this propoganda has turned previously rational people into blithering idiots willing to pay for MAN’S mistakes.


16 posted on 08/21/2007 5:03:56 AM PDT by wolfcreek (2 bad Tyranny, Treachery and Treason never take a vacation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
Sizzling study concludes: Global warming 'hot air'

It is REALLY nice to see others speaking out about a conclusion many of us reached LONG ago.

The globe has been warming since the last ice age ended and will continue to do so until the next ice age begins.

20 posted on 08/21/2007 5:17:59 AM PDT by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Wonder how those states or nations that ran industries out of their country to stop carbon emissions feel now. Its really hard to get a factory and industrial complex employing thousands or tens of thousands to relocate to your area. They most likely permanently lost those jobs.


22 posted on 08/21/2007 5:18:54 AM PDT by ran20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Whether the Earth is heating up is unknowable. It could be argued either way till dooms day, which will come when our sun blows itself, and us, to atoms.

To so-called environmentalists I say:

In a hundred billion eons,
Or tomorrow, for all we know,
Who will save the spotted owl
When Sol begins its dying-sun glow?

When oceans begin to boil away
What will tree-huggers do?
When all is Gone With the Astral Wind,
The Old Growth as well as the New

Who will care what happens to
The whales or Snails who dart,
When our sun turns white hot
and blows itself, and us, apart.

So much for the ecko-freaks cause
When all around us float
The dust of everything that was
But now is just a mote.

So use and enjoy our Worldly gifts
For Earth’s final fate
Is to be mere cinder bits
Drifting about in frozen space.


23 posted on 08/21/2007 5:28:59 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

but now corporations have figured out they can charge stupid people to pay extra for “green” products.


25 posted on 08/21/2007 5:34:43 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
Here in the Seattle area, 16 days out of the first 21 days of August have been below normal Temps. It really feels more like September with mostly cloudy days and cool crisp nights. We even had some areas of flooding due to a couple of really rainy days. Floods are very very rare this time of year. This has been the shortest Summer I can remember. Sooooooo whoever is hoarding all that Global warming, please send some our way, so I can get a couple of more golf weekends in before I put the clubs away.
26 posted on 08/21/2007 5:34:59 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

The real point here is that one does not need to be a physicist to debunk GW. It is mathematically impossible for mankind to be causing climate change, period.

Common sense vs. “religion”. No wonder we can’t reason with these alarmists.

In reality, this is simple more evidence that this is not about GW, it’s about socialism and government control.


30 posted on 08/21/2007 5:44:06 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
However, science be damned, the global warming zealots will still cling to their dogma no different than the 16th century Catholic Church’s support of Aristotle’s fixed earth universe, despite scientific proof to the contrary from Galileo and Copernicus.
32 posted on 08/21/2007 5:56:56 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
"Along with dozens of other studies in the scientific literature, [this] new study belies Al Gore's claim that there is no legitimate scholarly alternative to climate catastrophism. Indeed, if Schwartz's results are correct, that alone would be enough to overturn in one fell swoop the IPCC's scientific 'consensus,' the environmentalists' climate hysteria, and the political pretext for the energy-restriction policies that have become so popular with the world's environmental regulators, elected officials, and corporations. The question is, will anyone in the mainstream media notice?" AEI's Schwartz concluded.
It is "the mainstream media's" business to promote - the mainstream media. And it does that by promoting alarms which suggest that it is vital to the public that they pay attention to - the mainstream media. So if "The question is, will anyone in the mainstream media notice [that fear of carbon combustion is unfounded]," the answer is, quite certainly,

"NO!"

35 posted on 08/21/2007 6:10:59 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

“Joel Schwartz, of the American Enterprise Institute, said,”

That alone spells the death knell of anything he has to say being taken seriously. AGW`ers say the AEI is in the pocket of big oil.


40 posted on 08/21/2007 7:15:04 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

“Notice: This manuscript has been authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-
98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the
United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form
of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.”

And we know how much AGW`ers trust the Bush government.


41 posted on 08/21/2007 7:21:07 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson