Posted on 08/02/2007 5:56:40 PM PDT by LdSentinal
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) surprised both liberal and conservative activists Thursday by voting with Republicans on the Judiciary Committee to move a controversial conservative judicial nominee to the Senate floor.
Feinstein voted with nine Republicans to pass Leslie Southwick, President Bush’s nominee to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, despite the objections of Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and members of the Democratic leadership who sit on the panel. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.), a member of the Democratic leadership team, both voted against Southwick.
Feinstein’s support for Southwick is surprising because she is one of a small group of Democrats who voted against both of Bush’s nominees to the Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito.
But Feinstein and other Democrats have come under increasing pressure from Republicans in recent days to move Southwick.
On Wednesday, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) offered an amendment to children’s health insurance legislation on the Senate floor calling for a vote on the nomination.
Also this week, the leading Republican presidential candidates put out a cascade of statements on the growing Senate fight over Southwick, a maneuver designed to draw attention to the partisan divide over judges and excite conservatives on the campaign trail.
On Wednesday, former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) posted a harsh condemnation of Senate Democrats on his website, taking them to task for blocking the nomination.
By focusing on the fight over Southwick, Thompson and other GOP candidates have expanded the scope of the debate over conservative judges and put the issue at the forefront of the Republican primary. Until now, the skirmishing over Southwick had been confined to the Judiciary Committee hearing room and the few activists who follow closely the progress of Bush’s nominees.
“Sadly, Judge Southwick is the latest in a long line of nominees for that bench to be delayed,” Thompson wrote.
Also on Wednesday, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) sent a letter to Leahy exhorting him to move Southwick to the floor.
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) also jumped into the fray by issuing statements on Southwick Thursday.
“The Democrats’ obstructionism is a disgrace and is an example of politics at its worst,” said Giuliani in a statement on Democratic opposition to Southwick. “Our courts should not be compromised because of partisans who are forgoing their Constitutional responsibilities in order to pursue a political agenda.”
Over the past several weeks, senior Republican members of the Senate Appropriations Committee have put pressure on Feinstein, a fellow appropriator, to reconsider Southwick’s nomination. Sen. Thad Cochran (Miss.), ranking Republican on Appropriations, asked Feinstein to meet with Southwick. Sen. Arlen Specter (Pa.), ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee and a senior member of Appropriations, also pressed Feinstein.
Specter told The Hill last month that Feinstein was considering voting for Southwick, but last week Feinstein declined to talk about the nomination.
Liberal activists immediately condemned her vote.
“We are deeply disappointed that the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee and Senator Feinstein have advanced Leslie Southwick’s nomination to a powerful lifetime seat on the 5th Circuit,” said Ralph Neas, the president of People for the American Way, a liberal advocacy group that has consistently opposed Bush’s most conservative court picks.
“It is incomprehensible that someone with such a disturbing legal record is being pushed toward confirmation,” Neas said of Southwick. “That’s not what Americans voted for when they gave Democrats a majority in the Senate.”
Neas urged the full Senate to reject Southwick’s nomination. A floor vote is expected after the August recess.
Southwick is widely expected to have support from a majority of senators when he reaches the Senate floor. Sen. Ben Nelson (Neb.), a Democratic centrist, said yesterday that he would vote to confirm Southwick, giving the nominee crucial support in a chamber evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats.
Democratic opponents could still defeat Southwick’s nomination by blocking it with extended debate. But such a filibuster could quickly swell into a high-profile fight energizing the Republican base and putting pressure on Democrats from conservative states.
Curt Levey, the executive director of Committee for Justice and a defender of Bush’s nominees, said he was surprised that Feinstein defected Thursday but said that he expected Democrats to back down on Southwick eventually because he said their objections are so unsubstantial.
“I thought that when we shined the light of day on this that the Democrats would not be willing to pay the price,” he said. “The presidential contenders raised the issue and Republicans crafted a Sense of the Senate Resolution [on Southwick’s nomination] and more and more senators were going to the floor on it.”
Senate Democrats have objected to Southwick because he joined two controversial opinions while serving on the Mississippi Court of Appeals.
In one case, Southwick joined a narrow majority to uphold the reinstatement of a white state employee who had lost his job for using a racial slur. In another, he joined a decision to award custody of an 8-year-old child to her father instead of her bisexual mother. The decision inflamed liberal activists for its pointed use of the word “homosexual” instead of “gay.”
Every now and then, Feinstein will exhibit some reason. She’s not as moonbatty as Boxer is.
They they'd really hate to hear what I call them.
Never thought I’d say it, but “kudos to Feinstein”.
It doesn't take much to get these people mad.
I think I just saw a pig outside my second-floor window.
Mississippi ping
Nah. Somebody’s got the goods on Feinstein.
Or else she got $$$.
That could be it.. her husband had some good deals going on in military contracts...
Hmmm, this is the second time in recent history that I’ve been pleasantly surprised by Dianne Feinstein.
I would add to that comment, but then Kristinn would have to go on O'Reilly again.
Doubt it.
More likely she voted with the GOP to earn a pay back somewhere down the line.
Probably something ro do with China, since her husband deals with China
Kind of puts the beat down on senator Skru-mer
And just where was this leadership when the GOP was in the majority? Both chambers’ Republicans fight like dogs when outnumbered, and roll over like sleeping cats when they run things.
Oh, cruel fate. A small toast to the senior Senator from California. Blind pig/acorn moment, or someone’s got the goods on her husband.
bfl
STATE employee > First Amendment rules > correct decision.
In another, he joined a decision to award custody of an 8-year-old child to her father instead of her bisexual mother. The decision inflamed liberal activists for its pointed use of the word “homosexual” instead of “gay.”
Social libertarian that I am, I can't get too worked about that one either. The kid had to go to one parent or the other. Unless the dad was clearly unfit in some way, in a culture like Mississippi's, it's probably easier for the kid to live in a home that's less likely to be a target of anti-gay criticism and teasing. And it's appropriate to use technical terms in a legal decision.
Having lived in SF under her reign as mayor, I don't have a lot of regard for her, but given how rich hubby is, I don't think you could bribe her with anything less than drilling rights in a big oil patch.
Doesn’t she support a Presidential pardon of those two border agents too?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.