Skip to comments.
The Search For Noah's Ark
The Parent Company ^
| Kelly L. Segraves
Posted on 07/19/2007 10:57:32 AM PDT by Fennie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: VaBthang4
Looks like rosie’s pookie!
41
posted on
07/19/2007 12:32:45 PM PDT
by
enraged
To: island_dreamer
Were you there? Did you personally interview the scientists and the father & son to verify their reports? Have you ever been to Ararat to search for yourself? If not, your narrow-mindedness has run amock. Personally, Im not sure whats true about the ark, but I do believe in the possibility it exists, maybe at Ararat; Im not closed minded to the idea. Nice try yourself. The point I am making is..and I know this will come as a shock to you: Just because someone says something doesn't make it so!
But you miss the point, which is not surprising! How do you know there wasn't a Lilith in the Garden of Eden? Did you talk to Adam? Have you ever been to The Garden of Eden? Personally, I already know there was no Lilith there, I believe your narrow-mindedness has run amok!
More to the point...even though many historical places did at one time exist I know for a fact that they no longer do. The Colossus of Rhodes doesn't exist AND I DO NOT NEED TO GO THERE TO PROVE IT.
Can you even prove these "Scientist" existed? This all rings of Internet urban legend to me. There are many things I do not need to see to know they aren't there. You are the one being narrow minded by believing anything you hear then demanding someone prove it is NOT true. That's standing science on it's head. And before you go off on this being a matter of faith let me explain to you that faith has nothing to do with it. I take it as a matter of faith that the flood of Noah's day happened. I take it as a matter of faith that God commanded Noah to build the Ark that he did. I do not take it a matter of faith that a wooden boat has survived 6000 years on an environmentally brutal and earthquake prone mountain top.
42
posted on
07/19/2007 12:47:18 PM PDT
by
Artemis Webb
(New York Politicians do not think or believe like Americans! .....Fred Thompson -- 2008)
To: maine-iac7
“and in this photo - it appears to be looking directly down on an object (mid-left)that would look like the above sketch from above:”
I see a raving mid-left. I am not saying that it is NOT there, I don’t know. I’m saying that I don’t see it.
43
posted on
07/19/2007 12:47:50 PM PDT
by
Grunthor
(Wouldn’t it be music to our ears to hear the Iranian mullahs shouting “Incoming!”?)
To: maine-iac7
44
posted on
07/19/2007 12:53:48 PM PDT
by
Fennie
To: Fennie
If all of these older expeditions found the ark and they went inside it and even photographed it (where are those photographs anyway?), doesn’t it seem that somebody mounting a modern expedition with all the science at our disposal now would have found the darn thing?
Comment #46 Removed by Moderator
To: island_dreamer
I do NOT have “contempt for others who do not share my appreciation for BS”!!
I do on the other hand have contempt for you. :o)
Have a nice day.
47
posted on
07/19/2007 1:34:34 PM PDT
by
Artemis Webb
(New York Politicians do not think or believe like Americans! .....Fred Thompson -- 2008)
To: VaBthang4
Even though Fasold repudiated this as being the Ark, it's a pretty cool artifact.
48
posted on
07/19/2007 1:36:36 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Eddeche
correct. that is a hoax.
Nope, the picture he showed in the above post is no hoax.
49
posted on
07/19/2007 1:37:42 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: JSDude1; VaBthang4
that is a different site than the ararat anomaly..it is supposedly half under ice-broken in half ON the mountain, not a rock formation looking like a boat a bit near the mountains..
It's not a "rock formation". It's definitely an artifact and has been assayed by ground penetrating radar and magnetometers. The fact that it is not on "Ararat" means nothing. It is in the Ararat range and there's nothing more specific than than mentioned in the Biblical account.
50
posted on
07/19/2007 1:41:27 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Grunthor
It's like the face on Mars. People see what they want to see.
51
posted on
07/19/2007 1:46:46 PM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
Comment #52 Removed by Moderator
To: Artemis Webb
Eve was a trophy wife like Jeri Kehn, obviously.
53
posted on
07/19/2007 1:53:23 PM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: SaxxonWoods
With all of the satellites taking high definition photos of the earth, you might think that someone would have spotted something strange in the mountains.
54
posted on
07/19/2007 2:45:10 PM PDT
by
ANGGAPO
(LayteGulfBeachClub)
To: vox humana
C’mon man, Algore built the ark! Right before he got the idea to invent the internet.
55
posted on
07/19/2007 3:33:27 PM PDT
by
Free Vulcan
(Show them no mercy, for you shall receive none!)
To: Fennie
56
posted on
07/19/2007 3:57:37 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
( "...but you can't fool all of the people all the time." LINCOLN)
To: aruanan
fine then its an artifact; yet I think the more likely site of the Ark is Ararat itself..more probable!
57
posted on
07/19/2007 4:11:40 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
(Republicans if the don't beware ARE the new WHIGS! (all empty hairpieces..) :).)
To: DaveLoneRanger
58
posted on
07/19/2007 4:12:53 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
(Republicans if the don't beware ARE the new WHIGS! (all empty hairpieces..) :).)
To: JSDude1
fine then its an artifact; yet I think the more likely site of the Ark is Ararat itself..more probable!
More probable? Since the waters had been receding for quite a while before the ark "came to rest on the mountains of Ararat", it's more likely to have come to rest on the lower reaches of the Ararat range than on the top of the largest and tallest volcano in Turkey.
59
posted on
07/19/2007 4:21:18 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: enraged
On that, sir, we’ll just have to take your word.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson