[aruanan]

that is a different ‘site’ than the ararat anomaly..it is supposedly half under ice-broken in half ON the mountain, not a rock formation looking like a boat a bit near the mountains..

It's not a "rock formation". It's definitely an artifact and has been assayed by ground penetrating radar and magnetometers. The fact that it is not on "Ararat" means nothing. It is in the Ararat range and there's nothing more specific than than mentioned in the Biblical account.

[JSDude1]

fine then its an artifact; yet I think the more likely site of the Ark is Ararat itself..more probable!