Posted on 07/11/2007 8:56:12 PM PDT by Jean S
Sen. Arlen Specter (Pa.), the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, has fired an early volley in what Senate Republicans and conservative activists predict will escalate into another pitched battle with Democrats on judicial nominees.
Specter has accused Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) of breaking promises they made regarding Leslie Southwick, President Bush’s pick for the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Specter aired his grievance with Reid and Leahy during a private meeting with leading conservative activists late Tuesday afternoon. Specter told those assembled that he was prepared to battle Democrats and asked if they also had an appetite for a fight, according to several people who attended the meeting. The activists assured Specter that they were eager to confront the Democrats on Southwick.
Building conservative grassroots support for Southwick would give Senate Republican leaders leverage to unify their caucus and oppose Democrats on the issue. Specter said in an interview yesterday that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) “has talked about some Republican action to put pressure on the Democrats to move the process forward.”
Recently, Specter and Leahy have had collegial encounters on judges, especially when measured by the partisan standard set by the committee in recent years. By faulting Democrats for ignoring assurances they made in private negotiations,
Specter has cast aside the drape of politesse that often hides behind-the-scenes Senate skirmishes.
Republican discontent over the progress of Southwick’s nomination reached a boiling point Tuesday because early in the day Reid told Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), Southwick’s chief advocate in the Senate, that the nomination had no hope of confirmation, according to GOP sources.
“I’m informed that Senate Majority Leader Reid told McConnell that he would bring [Southwick] to the floor before the Memorial Day recess,” Specter said in an interview. “That was undercut by Judiciary Committee action.”
Reid’s spokesman, Jim Manley, explained the change of mind.
“The more Senator Reid looked into Judge Southwick’s qualifications and some of his writings, the more concerned he became.
“Reid has made it clear that he wants to move as many nominations as possible, but it’s obvious Southwick will face strong opposition in the Judiciary Committee,” Manley added.
Specter said, however, that Leahy had promised that Judiciary Committee Democrats would allow the full Senate to vote on Southwick. Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) derailed that pledge.
“Sen. Leahy told me that he was prepared to voice vote Southwick out of committee,” Specter said. “Feingold raised an objection. In the intervening time, the positions hardened.”
Leahy could not be reached for comment by press time.
Feingold said he was “unaware of any agreement or promise made by Senator Leahy to report the Southwick nomination by voice vote.”
“It is clear that a majority of the committee opposes the nomination,” he said.
Southwick has drawn objections from Feingold and other Democrats because he joined two controversial opinions while serving on the Mississippi Court of Appeals.
In one case, Southwick joined a narrow majority to uphold the reinstatement of a white state employee who had lost his job for using a racial slur. In another, he joined a decision to award custody of an 8-year-old child to her father instead of her bisexual mother. The decision inflamed liberal activists for its pointed use of the word “homosexual” instead of “gay.”
Republicans argue that Southwick has an exemplary record. They note that he did not author the two controversial decisions highlighted by Democrats but merely joined the majority’s opinion. And they point out that the American Bar Association rated him unanimously well qualified, the highest possible rating.
“The purpose of the meeting was to inform us of what happened,” said Wendy Long, counsel for the Judicial Confirmation Network, a group that has supported Bush’s nominees. Long and more than a dozen conservative activists attended Tuesday’s meeting with Specter.
“He thinks it would be wise to fight, he is ready to fight, he is eager to fight and he wants to know if we would do the same,” Long said, summarizing Specter’s interaction with conservatives. “Every person in the room was very enthusiastic about a fight.”
The vice president of government affairs at the Family Research Council, Tom McClusky, who also met with Specter, said conservatives have rallied behind Specter’s call to keep Southwick’s nomination alive.
“The response he got was a unanimous ‘Yes!’” McClusky said.
Specter’s role in marshaling conservative groups to push back against Democratic opposition to Southwick shows how his relationship with them has evolved since taking over the senior Republican slot on Judiciary.
Conservative activists strongly opposed Specter’s ascension to the chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee in 2004 because of statements he had made about judicial nominees who oppose abortion rights. Immediately after the election, Specter told reporters that he thought it unlikely the Senate would confirm a Supreme Court nominee who would overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which established the right to an abortion.
Now conservatives are rallying around Specter.
“Specter has exercised a good deal of leadership,” said Long, of the Judicial Confirmation Network. “People are very grateful to him for being willing to show leadership on this.”
Jesus....
Democrats LIE, they cheat, and they STEAL....
How long has Spector been in Congress? And how many years has it taken him to realize this?
Bookmark.
He asks us this a few years after the Gang of Fourteen, Alito, Roberts and now the loss of the Senate Majority.
Timing stinks Arlen.
I'm curious. Do you now regret not doing more to push the judges through because it's partially why conservatives wanted to punish you guys last year. I only ask because I know how much you cherished being the one in charge, and now you must defer to Leahy.
I'm torn over this. I know we can't be petty to the point we screw ourselves from getting a judge confirmed, but I resent having to rally around these guys responsible for the loss of the majority because NOW they do something, or say they will, right. Specter on this, McCain on the war. I dislike them both, but now have to suck it up for greater reasons.
Yes, Specter, I'll fight for judges. I have for years. You're the one who's always been the question mark.
Specter is just now realizing Dems break their promise? Give me a break! It would be more startling news if they kept their promise!
Your right. The RINO may have a horn but he is too late in using it.
You know, many times when I smell a dung pile in 105 degree heat, I think of Comrade Spectre.
Strom Thurmond trusted him. That fact that Specter, especially his staff, didn't remember Leahy stabbing the retiring Thurmond in the back is just another sign of how low the US Senate has sunk.
I’m SHOCKED, I tell you.
“I’m curious. Do you now regret not doing more to push the judges through because it’s partially why conservatives wanted to punish you guys last year. I only ask because I know how much you cherished being the one in charge, and now you must defer to Leahy.”
Specter likes being the bottom in their relationship, from what I can tell.
Look at some of these statements -
"Specter aired his grievance with Reid and Leahy during a private meeting with leading conservative activists late Tuesday afternoon. Specter told those assembled that he was prepared to battle Democrats and asked if they also had an appetite for a fight, according to several people who attended the meeting. The activists assured Specter that they were eager to confront the Democrats on Southwick."
Something happened that has apparently p!$$ed Arlen off!
See - "Specter has cast aside the drape of politesse that often hides behind-the-scenes Senate skirmishes."
Maybe it's wishful thinking on my part, but I've had Arlen as my Senator long enough, and for some reason an alarm is going off in the back of my mind.
I think I'll give his office a call tomorrow and try to stirr things up.
I am sure he would know.
Let's give him a call or 10 tomorrow.
Remind him of how he was lied to, and ask him if he's going to let Reid and Leahy get away with it!
What do you think?
Maybe he should have said faggots and hershey highway specialist instead.
The Democrats are just proceeding in the lawless destruction of the judicial system that the ACLU and other Marxists are leading them to do.
I realize I’m being a bit satirical here, but it ought to be cause for removal for a Republican to be in the Senate as long as Specter has and still believe that Democrats can be trusted.
More appropriate title, Specter is Lucy and the Conservative activists are Charlie Brown.
Specter proves like today that he is Leahy’s puppet, when he demands every administration official tell of all conversations about replacement of 8 US Attorneys that violated no law.
He doesn’t give a dam if conservative judges are confirmed.
I find it shocking that a Republican would trust any Democrat at this point. Don’t they realize that when Dems look in the mirror there is NO reflection?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.