So apparently I can now offend homosexuals by calling them homosexual.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: little jeremiah; wagglebee
To: tuesday afternoon
3 posted on
07/06/2007 4:21:23 PM PDT by
Radix
(The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race)
To: tuesday afternoon
It’s the correct, clinical term.
Apparently, this person is unwilling to deal with reality.
4 posted on
07/06/2007 4:21:59 PM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(A dyslexic, agnostic insomniac asks, "Is there a doG?")
To: tuesday afternoon
Is fruitcake OK?
6 posted on
07/06/2007 4:22:39 PM PDT by
WorkingClassFilth
(Now with an improved red neck!)
To: tuesday afternoon
So apparently I can now offend homosexuals by calling them homosexual.And I intend to do so at every opportunity.
7 posted on
07/06/2007 4:22:46 PM PDT by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: tuesday afternoon
8 posted on
07/06/2007 4:22:54 PM PDT by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: tuesday afternoon
So apparently I can now offend homosexuals by calling them homosexual.Yeah. That's just soooo gay!
9 posted on
07/06/2007 4:23:49 PM PDT by
null and void
(A large gov't agency is more expensive than a smaller agency with the same mission, yet does less)
To: tuesday afternoon
10 posted on
07/06/2007 4:24:07 PM PDT by
poinq
To: tuesday afternoon
11 posted on
07/06/2007 4:24:12 PM PDT by
toddlintown
(Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: tuesday afternoon
To the author of this piece: I do have an ‘ear for language’ after having worked as a medical transcriptionist almost the entire 35 years of my working life, and there is nothing offensive about the term homosexual.
12 posted on
07/06/2007 4:24:20 PM PDT by
Theresawithanh
(With an F, and an R, and an E, and a D, and an F-R-E-D...FRED!!!!!!!!)
To: tuesday afternoon
I like the Simpsons. Does that make me homersexual?
13 posted on
07/06/2007 4:24:21 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: tuesday afternoon
But they called us "homosexuals" throughout the piece, and that's not great. It's degrading and offensive and archaic.Homosexual is quite appropriate, but the homosexuals don't like to hear it because it exposes them for who they really are. Their lobby can hide behind the other terms, but they can't hide behind the real, medical descriptor: homosexual.
14 posted on
07/06/2007 4:24:22 PM PDT by
rabscuttle385
(Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
To: tuesday afternoon
Aren't they supposed to be called “poofers”?
15 posted on
07/06/2007 4:24:48 PM PDT by
Mark was here
(Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
To: All
Again, I don’t mean to opinionated about it, but if you don’t hear the negative nuance in the word homosexual, it’s either because you’re not listening, or more likely, you don’t have an ear for language.In plain language, this professional homosexual is full of crap.
16 posted on
07/06/2007 4:25:05 PM PDT by
dighton
To: tuesday afternoon
18 posted on
07/06/2007 4:25:09 PM PDT by
svanni
To: tuesday afternoon
19 posted on
07/06/2007 4:25:21 PM PDT by
NucSubs
(Rudy Giuliani 2008! Our liberal democrat is better than theirs!)
To: tuesday afternoon
20 posted on
07/06/2007 4:25:21 PM PDT by
TonyM
(E)
To: tuesday afternoon
First, the clinical nature of the term. It's a scientific word that mildly dehumanizes gay people by suggesting that they have a medical or psychological condition.
Homosexuals do have a psychological problem!
21 posted on
07/06/2007 4:25:33 PM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: tuesday afternoon
I can think of a whole lot of other terms if they prefer. I just can’t post them on FreeRepublic.
22 posted on
07/06/2007 4:25:43 PM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
To: tuesday afternoon
Excuse me but gay used to mean cheerfully happy but that didn’t stop homosexuals from corrupting the word. They are what they are.
23 posted on
07/06/2007 4:25:46 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson