[mware]

Condom may be a reason dna evidence might not be found.

Sorry Nifong, but DNA evidence WAS found and you hid it from the defense and the court.

[Right_in_Virginia]

So, according to Nifong, these “hooligans” were guilty because he presumed they’d practiced safe sex?

[jiggyboy]

Oh brother he's just making crap up here, the questioner asks him why he was talking about the possibility of a condom even though he has the report from the nurse saying no condom was used, and he says, oh, that's because I was responding to a hypothetical question of how could it be possible that no DNA would be found.

[Brytani]

I’ve gone over the condom issue many MANY times on this forum. My education is in crime scene investigation, meaning I think I know a thing or two about DNA evidence and condom use.

Nifong is making a mockery over the use of condoms and collection of DNA material. If this case went down as Magnum claimed it did, it would be irrelevant as to the use of a condom or not. Sweat, hair, semen, blood, skin, saliva etc would have been found on her body. In fact, the onlything found was the semen of 3 (wasn’t that the final number) different men, much older then the estimated time of the claim attack.

Nifong should know better as a prosecutor and I’m sure he does, at least when an election isn’t in full swing.