I’ve gone over the condom issue many MANY times on this forum. My education is in crime scene investigation, meaning I think I know a thing or two about DNA evidence and condom use.
Nifong is making a mockery over the use of condoms and collection of DNA material. If this case went down as Magnum claimed it did, it would be irrelevant as to the use of a condom or not. Sweat, hair, semen, blood, skin, saliva etc would have been found on her body. In fact, the onlything found was the semen of 3 (wasn’t that the final number) different men, much older then the estimated time of the claim attack.
Nifong should know better as a prosecutor and I’m sure he does, at least when an election isn’t in full swing.
Less than ideal. How about the fact that all the guys in the line up were from the Duke Lacross team.
He is willing to take the hit for the comments to the press. It is the dna that is going to cost him and his attorney knows that.
I don't know how the man can sleep at night; other than he truly has no conscious.
Yes. I’m not trained in this area, but I’ve researched and written about crimes. What Nifong is saying makes no sense given the initial story (or stories) told by Mangum. Maybe there would be no semen, but hardly “no DNA.”