Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Great Media Scandal Keeps Getting Greater {TWA 800}
WorldNetDaily ^ | 7 June 2007 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 06/07/2007 11:16:02 AM PDT by Hal1950

James Sanders is stirring again.

Two items have put the veteran investigative reporter – and my partner on the documentary "Silenced" and the book "First Strike" – on his own personal Code Orange.

One is the news out of JFK that Islamic terrorists are up to their old tricks again. At JFK? My, who da thunk it?

The second, and more personally galvanizing, is that Sanders has just gotten a big batch of new TWA Flight 800-related documents from the FBI through the Freedom of Information Act.

These documents stem from Sanders' stillborn civil suit against a government that convicted him and his wife, Elizabeth, of conspiracy for his reporting on the TWA Flight 800 investigation.

In the course of our history, citizens have received worse treatment at the hand of a generally benign government. But no reporter has been treated more shabbily at the hand of the media – ever.

In truth, the Clinton years did not bring out the best in the major media. During the TWA 800 investigation in particular, they hewed to the government line with a pride and passion that would make Edward R. Murrow squirm in his grave.

And God help the poor soul, like James Sanders, who got out of line.

Undaunted now as then, Sanders wades through these new documents like a wily prospector in Sutter's Creek. Most of the gold has been stripped away or redacted, but if you know what to look for, as Sanders does, the nuggets stand out.

His sense of humor somehow intact, Sanders forwards key documents to my shared fax under the heading, "SECRET – sensitive journalism. Do not read. If you do, you will turn into a Democrat."

The one document that intrigues me most tells of Sanders' treatment at the hands of that great 57th Street institution, CBS News.

In the way of background, Sanders had granted an exclusive interview to Emmy Award-winning CBS producer Kristina Borjesson the same day a story about his research broke in California's Riverside Press-Enterprise.

"New Data Show Missile May Have Nailed TWA 800," screamed the paper's one-inch, front-page headline on March 10, 1997.

Working with Terrel Stacey, TWA's 747 top manager inside the investigation, Sanders had received, among other information, a few foam rubber bits of seatback that contained the DNA of the investigation, streaks of an unknown red-orange residue.

Sanders had the residue tested at an independent West Coast lab, which found it to be consistent with exhaust from a solid fuel missile. To verify his claim, Sanders had sent a separate sample to CBS.

After the CBS interview had been videotaped, however, Borjesson grew alarmed when she realized no one at the "Evening News" was editing the piece.

Frustrated, she walked into a meeting of news executives and asked why the network wasn't doing the story on Sanders and his documents.

"You think it's a missile, don't you?" queried an executive she didn't recognize.

"I don't know what the hell it is," Borjesson shot back, "but don't you think we should be doing a story that asks a few questions about this guy and his documents?" The silence that followed was, as Borjesson admits, "deafening."

When she had walked in to the room, she honestly believed she was about to correct an oversight at a level where it could be corrected quickly. "I walked out of there," said Borjesson, "feeling like I'd cooked my own goose."

When CBS finally aired the story, it used what Borjesson calls "a classic avoidance tactic" to keep Sanders off the air while reporting – and dismissing – his side of the story.

Borjesson was elated, however, when "60 Minutes" expressed its interest in doing the story. She thanked its senior producer, telling him "60 Minutes" was the "last broadcast with balls." Borjesson put the residue sample in the producer's desk for safekeeping until she could locate a lab.

The FBI 302 tells the dispiriting story of what happened next. Two special agents visited CBS and talked to a senior attorney, Howard Jaeckel. Jaeckel told the FBI that "disclosing a source is very sensitive to us."

That much perfunctory business out of the way, Jaeckel and CBS eagerly cooperated with the FBI to the point of deep-sixing any scheduled production on the subject and meekly handing over the untested residue sample.

Abandoned by the last broadcast with balls, James and Elizabeth Sanders were charged with conspiracy under a law that had been enacted to discourage scavengers and souvenir hunters, not reporters.

At the time of their arraignment on Long Island, none among the media managed to pose even one First Amendment question. The reporters found it much more comfortable to frame the Sanders' transgression as simple theft.

When the Sanders' lawyer attempted to bring this issue into focus, Newsday's Bob Kessler argued the government line, insisting the Justice Department had not found sufficient evidence to declare James Sanders a journalist entitled to First Amendment protection.

This shocked Sanders in that the Riverside Press-Enterprise article had identified him as an "investigative reporter," detailed his previous nonfiction books, and described his inquiry into the TWA 800 investigation over the preceding five months.

Another reporter asked the attorney why his client did not immediately return the residue to the NTSB and turn Stacey in to the FBI. Sanders shook his head in disbelief. Was it only a generation ago that the New York Times made Daniel Ellsberg a hero by publishing the purloined and fully classified Pentagon Papers?

Of course, just four years later, as soon as a Republican re-occupied the White House, whistleblowing came roaring back into vogue with almost comic ferocity.

No state secret was safe anymore, even if its revelation endangered the world.

At the end of 2002, self-parody reached something of journalistic peak when Time magazine named as its "Persons of the Year" three female whistleblowers.

"They took huge professional and personal risks to blow the whistle on what went wrong at WorldCom, Enron and the FBI," said the newly vigilant Time, "and in so doing helped remind us what American courage and American values are all about."

Airsickness bag, anyone?


TOPICS: US: New York; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: flight800; foic; jackcashill; jamessanders; twa800; twaflight800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-211 next last

TO: All conspiracy theorists...

You’d think that video of the supposed “missile” would be on YouTube or the internet somewhere. I searched and found nothing.


61 posted on 06/07/2007 10:36:27 PM PDT by Zeon Cowboy (DUNCAN HUNTER for President - http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; JoeA
And because no claimed responsibilty we should ignore the attack?

The fact that nobody claimed responsibility makes me wonder if there was an attack to begin with.

They did... our press either didn't report it... or, taking the lead from the administration's attitude, deliberately discounted any claims:

"In the absence of explanations, theories abounded. One focused on a fax sent Wednesday to an Arabic language newspaper in Beirut warning of an attack. State Department and CIA officials confirmed they had received copies of the fax Thursday. The message said "tomorrow morning we will strike the Americans in a way they do not expect and it will be very surprising to them," according to one official. A counterterrorism source familiar with the fax said that it was sent at 11 a.m. New York time Wednesday, more than nine hours before the bombing. But a CIA source said that the agency "does not attach too much significance" to the fax.

"The fax, written in Arabic, ends with the following threat: "The Mujahadeen will respond harshly to the threats of the stupid American president. All will be shocked by the magnitude of the response. The determining of the place and time are in the hands of the Mujahadeen. The invaders must get ready to leave alive or dead; and their rendezvous will be morning, and isn't morning near." U.S. News and World Report magazine, in the July 29, 1996 issue, identified the group who sent the fax as, "The Movement of Islamic Jihad/The Jihad Wing of the Arabian Peninsula." [Editors Note: 8pm Eastern Time in New York is early morning in the Persian Gulf.]"
Newsday.com, July 19, 1996

. . . Senior Iranian sources close to the fundamentalist regime in Tehran claimed this weekend that TWA flight 800 was shot down last month by one of three shoulder-fired Stingers of the type used by Islamic guerrillas during the Afghanistan war. The sources said the missiles arrived in America seven months ago after being shipped from Karachi via Rotterdam and on to the Canadian port of Halifax. They claimed an Egyptian fundamentalist group backed by Iran was responsible for smuggling the weapons across the Canadian border into the United States. The group, the Gama'a al-Islamiya, comprises followers of Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, a blind Egyptian cleric jailed in the United States over the 1993 New York World Trade Center bombing."
The Times of London, August 27, 1996

" . . . at least one terrorist has claimed credit for the TWA 800 bombing. World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Ahmed Yousef told authorities his group is responsible. Yousef's claim has not been made public, but it is in the FBI file."
The American Spectator, Sept. 1997

If you can read Arabic, here is the Al Hayat article threatening the attack.

62 posted on 06/07/2007 10:41:08 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950; KC Burke; y'all; tpaine
Yet, other longtime supporters of the missile(s) theory such as Swordmaker and tpaine contend that the huge fireball exploded at about 7,000 feet.

Yes, I did and do.

What difference does it make? Simply put, the 747 could not have been a missile(s) shootdown victim if the huge fireball bal explosion took place at anywhere near 7,000 feet moments after the fiery streak.

That's the strawman argument you propose to shoot down the missile theory. You are assuming the huge fireball was the initiating event. It wasn't.


Here is the TWA-800 timeline I created several years ago on FR. . . .


These facts were well known... I created a timeline of the event back in September of 2002 that accounted for all of the known facts at that time. I reproduce it for you here. You attention is particularly pointed to the entry listed in red...


Since I made a typo in the original, here is a corrected version of the Swordmaker timeline:

---------------------

Let's see if we can construct Asmodeus' oft demanded timeline that our math seems to indicate occurred rather than his wacked out theory.

20:31:00 - Plane flying normally, altitude 13,400 ft., climbing at 33 ft/sec.

20:31:04 - Possible ground-to-air missile launch. Rate of climb accelerates to Mach 2.1.

20:31:07 - Mike Wire notices flare like object rising over house and arcing to left. in the next 8 seconds many more people notice streak, firework, etc.

20:31:10 - Major Fred Meyer sees "meteor like" object flash acorss his field of view.

20:31:12 - ~13,800 ft. - 0 sec. Last transponder return, everything normal, Aircraft climbing at 33 ft./second.

20:31:13 - ~13,840 ft. - ~1 sec. Missile strikes TWA800 on left side at approximately seat row 16-17 transects the passenger cabin spewing partially burned solid rocket fuel (and leaving a red residue on seats in this area), taking out passengers and seats in rows 17-18 and exits aircraft through right side. VDR ends in loud, strange sound. Bright white Ordnance type explosion occurs just after missile exits thin walled cabin. Blast places massive overpressure on nose of aircraft and opens wide gap in side of aircraft. Parts of missile continue on momentum at speed approaching MACH 2 at a vector 190 degrees from north, ejecta from aircraft including seats, passengers, luggage to eventually land in "crosswind blast debris" field. The blast imparts a slightly more eastward vector for the ejecta which combined with the ejecta's already present eastward momentum results in the ejecta coming to rest about 175 degrees from the point of ejection.

20:31:14 - ~13,880 ft. - ~2 sec. 400+ MPH winds acting on the gaping holes in aircraft fuselage causes the "unzip" of the aluminum skin of the nose. Windforce bends the nose up and breaks the "keel" of the fuselage. Signals to control surfaces and engines cease when wires are broken and engines revert to idle. Drag is no longer being counteracted by the thrust of the engines. The plane slows drastically.

20:31:15 - ~13, 900 ft - ~3 sec. Drag pulls the nose up and away from the rest of the fuselage and breaks loose on the right first and falls away to the left where it is still partially attached, twisting the aircraft toward the left and starts to fall pulling the left wing down, changing the vector of lift imparting a strong leftward force on the aircraft. Unbalanced drag toward the left is enormous. This accounts for the sudden leftward change in aircraft vector.

20:31:16:49 - ~13,890 ft - 4.49 sec. First post IE radar return. - The nose swings under and to the right and breaks completely loose and continues on a momentum driven ballistic fall slightly to the right (about 3 degrees) of the original aircraft vector. The noseless aircraft losing both the balance necessary for proper flight AND the thrust of the engines overcoming drag, pitches rapidly up and stalls. it may climb a very small amount during the pitch up before stall.

20:31:17 - ~13,860 ft. - ~5 sec. Gravity's inexorable pull starts the plane on its final trajectory. Drag is slowing the forward velocity and the uncontrolled aircraft is on either a ballistic fall or a somewhat aerodynamic fall.

20:31:21:13 - ~13,500 ft. - 9.13 sec. Second post IE radar return. - Uncontrolled plane pitches and yaws, lift occasionally pulls the plane in different vectors... this time a strong rightward vector. Drag continues to rip and rend the airframe just in front of the wing.

20:31:25:72 - ~12,300 ft. - 13.72 sec. Third post IE radar return. - More gyrations... now vectored back to the right.

20:31:30:37 - ~10,900 ft. - 18.37 sec. Fourth post IE radar return. - Falling steeply now. Much of the forward momentum is gone due to drag. Structural damage is weakening the Center Wing Tank's integrity and wings are no longer as strongly attached to the remaining fuselage.

20:31:32:?? - ~10,050 ft. - ~20 sec. Terminal velocity achieved of ~450 ft./second.

20:31:34:97 - ~9,100 ft. - 22.97 sec. Fifth post IE radar return. Stress is taking its toll on the wingroots. The Center Wing Tank structural members are buckling under the whipping of the plane rolling and pitching. Fuel is now leaking into the area around the Wing roots from the full wing tanks.

20:31:36:?? - ~8,500 ft. - ~24 sec. The aircraft takes a VERY sharp turn to the right (South) and one of the wing's fails, breaking away from the fuselage. The aircraft with only one wing starts to spin rapidly, spewing jet fuel and agitating it into the atmosphere, mixing it with air.

20:31:39:64 - ~7,000 ft. - 27.64 sec. Sixth post IE radar return. - Center Wing Tank explodes from spark caused by MECHANICAL breaking of metal. Volatile air-fuel mix surrounding aircraft ignited into Massive Fireball, Hot fireball begins to RISE, while burning plane falls through bottom of Fireball still spewing liquid fuel which ignites on exit from wingtanks.

8:31:43 - Elmer's "Streak of light" crippled plane appears.

20:31:44:29 - ~4,900 ft. - 32.29 sec. Seventh post IE radar return. - Still falling at 450 ft. per second.

20:31:47 - ~3,680 ft - End of streak - Elmer Asmodeus's mythical "Eyewitness Myth" Explosion of Massive Fireball at 5500-7500 feet.

20:31:48:94 - ~2,800 ft. - 36.94 sec. Eighth post IE radar return. - Shortly after the Flight TWA800 falls below the radar horizon and no further radar returns are received.

20:31:55 - ~43 sec. splashdown.

Total Elapsed time from Initiating Event (the missile strike?) = ~43 seconds. Plus or minus 2 seconds.


63 posted on 06/07/2007 10:50:02 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

Well, that settles it for me. Thanks for your frankness.


64 posted on 06/07/2007 10:55:07 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
Good question...as I recall, there were some navy operations going on in the area that evening...

So you think the U.S. Navy goes around shooting down U.S. airliners, either on purpose or by accident, and then covers it up? I suppose you think the Haditha marines are guilty, too?

65 posted on 06/08/2007 3:52:35 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
Isn’t this the guy that STOLE evidence from the collection site?

James Sanders did not steal the seat foam samples. They were provided by insiders where the 747 was being re-assembled that also had doubts about the direction of the investigation.

66 posted on 06/08/2007 4:14:40 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Why is it that when Al Gore, John Kerry, or George Stephanopoulis talk about politics or global warming or almost anything else then most of the people here immediately suspect their truthfulness, but when it comes to TWA 800 suddenly their word is gospel?

Very good point. Unfortunately, the Stephanopoulis quote is from immediately after TWA 800 went down. He was giving interviews from the White House and called TWA 800 a terrorist attack.

The media ran with that line for several hours, speculating about shoulder-fired weapons, etc.

It was hours later that the White House stopped calling it a terrorist attack and began to stop the speculation.

None of this proves anything. The seat material tests that were never duplicated (because CBS turned over the samples to the FBI) could have put this matter to rest.

67 posted on 06/08/2007 4:27:15 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

To be honest, the man INVESTIGATED evidence from the crash and publicly reported his results. Without investigation no proper ruling can be made.


68 posted on 06/08/2007 4:30:16 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950
All testimony, that of eyewitnesses, that of law officers who observed a crime, that of experts, that of scientists about the results of experiments, that of forensic specialists -- ALL is allegation. An allegation is just another word for testimony.

There is not one fact before a court or hearing board, which is not also an allegation at some point.

69 posted on 06/08/2007 4:34:39 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

He accepted evidence that was removed from re-assembly site?

OK


70 posted on 06/08/2007 5:30:51 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Was he authorized to gather/receive evidence from this crash? Did he know that the materials were removed from the re-assembly location?


71 posted on 06/08/2007 5:32:51 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Back off, my friend. I did not say those words, you just did. I think there is something rotten about the way the gov’ment handled this whole thing, same gov’ment creeps that “handled” the fed bldg coverup in Oklahoma City. And if you think the “gov’ment” is incapable, think again.


72 posted on 06/08/2007 6:18:37 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
Back off, my friend. I did not say those words, you just did.

Back off my foot. You're saying that you believe that the Navy either purposely or accidentally shot down that airliner and then deliberately covered it up. As a retired naval officer I take exception to anyone who would smear the Navy,or any branch of the military, in that fashion.

And if you think the “gov’ment” is incapable, think again.

And you believe the military is capable of doing so.

73 posted on 06/08/2007 6:29:01 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
He accepted evidence that was removed from re-assembly site?

Yes, according to Sanders, several workers in the assembly building expressed concern over evidence tampering, etc and provided the seat foam samples.

While technically illegal, this could fall under "whistleblower" guidelines.

Sanders' sample was the only one tested and was found consistent with solid rocket residue. There does not seem be an explanation for why such residue might exist on the seat samples other than an impact with a missile.

Sanders provided another sample to CBS in an attempt to get a larger news organization involved. Unfortunately, CBS turned the samples over to the FBI without testing them.

74 posted on 06/08/2007 6:34:57 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Because they didn’t have time to script their responses. When talking about global warming, for instance, it is a talking point discussion. When being interviewed about the GWOT, they try to make a point and accidently spew out TWA800 when talking about previous attacks on America. It is a classical interrogation result.


75 posted on 06/08/2007 8:01:39 AM PDT by Safetgiver (Hazelton...doing the job the American Government refuses to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bvw
"There is not one fact before a court or hearing board, which is not also an allegation at some point.

You have the cart before the horse. Testimony and allegations are not necessarily irrefutable facts.

76 posted on 06/08/2007 8:32:48 AM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker; tpaine
The initial event was at approximately 8:31:12 at about 13,800 feet.

You both say the huge firball exploded at approximately 7,000 feet - which was about 6,800 feet below the initial event.

Only moments before the huge fireball explosion, the fiery streak appeared and tracked to where that huge fireball then exploded.

ALL of the wreckage had obviously been falling for a long time by then.

It's accordingly also obvious that the fiery streak was descending and that it was the ignition source of the huge fireball.

77 posted on 06/08/2007 8:53:28 AM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950
It's accordingly also obvious that the fiery streak was descending and that it was the ignition source of the huge fireball.

Not obvious at all... nor does a descending streak agree with the statements of the eyewitnesses.

78 posted on 06/08/2007 9:18:30 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"I and my wife saw the 'streak of light' video the night of the crash, - and we were both amazed the next morning that it no longer 'existed'. I have no specific theory of what happened, but I know what I saw that night.

You've changed your story. Here's what you said before - and the evidence it wasn't so then either:

"My wife & I saw the 'party tape' loop being shown on a network satellite feed the night of the incident. Obviously, if I had the 'cocktail party tape', we would know exactly. It disappeared after being shown a few times many years ago, as has been discussed on many previous threads."

Here's what you were unknowingly talking about then:

THE LINDA KABOT PHOTO

http://judiciary.senate.gov/oldsite/51099lsa.htm
(quote) The photo taken by Kabot depicts a bearing of north/northeast. TWA Flight 800 was south/southwest almost directly behind her. Photograph analyzed by CIA National Imagery and Mapping Administration (NIMA) advised that
1. THERE IS OBJECT IN PHOTO
2. OBJECT IS NOT A MISSILE
3. OBJECT APPEARS TO BE AN AIRCRAFT
Not possible to ID aircraft because:
Not possible to determine distance of object from camera.
Exact time of photo unknown. (time frame only is known)
Insufficient detail in photo to determine type of aircraft.
4. OBJECT IS NOT A DRONE
No drone exercises conducted near Long Island July 17, 1996

79 posted on 06/08/2007 9:21:32 AM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
I said: "It's accordingly also obvious that the fiery streak was descending and that it was the ignition source of the huge fireball."

You say: "Not obvious at all... nor does a descending streak agree with the statements of the eyewitnesses . . ."

You earlier said: " . . . the huge fireball explosion took place (1) at 7,0000 feet, and (2) at approximately 8:31:40, twenty-eight seconds after the initial event.

Let's see if you can find supporting witness reports for that that allegation.

80 posted on 06/08/2007 9:46:57 AM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson