Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Good article about an old idea.
1 posted on 06/05/2007 10:55:21 AM PDT by K-oneTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: K-oneTexas
The 17th is the single worst Constitutional Amendment every ratified.

Bar none.

L

2 posted on 06/05/2007 10:55:56 AM PDT by Lurker (Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing small pox to plague.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

That is a bell that cannot be “unrung” now because of the nature of the amendment process. What senator in his right mind is going to vote himself out of what has essentially become a lifetime appointment? The article hits the nail on the head, but I’m afraid it’s about as productive as pissing in the wind.


5 posted on 06/05/2007 10:59:11 AM PDT by fix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

Republicans for Amnesty; Flood Their Offices With Email Telling Them You Will Vote Them Out

http://www.savage-productions.com/republicans_for_amnesty.html


13 posted on 06/05/2007 11:04:34 AM PDT by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

This is one of the reasons FR exists.


15 posted on 06/05/2007 11:05:31 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

The 16th and 17th were passed when the Socialist party had a decent influence in American politics. Their quickly growing numbers (from 13,000 registered voters in 1901 to 118,000 in 1912) made them an occasional player on the stage. The 17th was a Eugene Debs creation. (Debs got 400,000 votes for President in 1904)


16 posted on 06/05/2007 11:08:30 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas
I've long said to anyone who'll listen, that the 17th Amendment was the worst things ever done to the Constitution. The last thing that the founders wanted was delivering a democracy, which is why they designed the government so that only 1 of the 3 branches were to be democratically elected. The 17th means that 2/3s of the government is now democratically elected.

Mark

24 posted on 06/05/2007 11:25:47 AM PDT by MarkL (Environmental heretics should be burned at the stake, in a "Carbon Neutral" way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

For reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a399342cd553c.htm
The Constitution of the United States of America with Amendments


31 posted on 06/05/2007 11:35:33 AM PDT by CollegeRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

“Delaware once went four years at a stretch without a Senator”

Fine by me.


35 posted on 06/05/2007 11:48:21 AM PDT by Nightbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

Agreed

Scrap the 17th Ammendment!!


38 posted on 06/05/2007 11:58:39 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onedoug

ping


41 posted on 06/05/2007 12:20:01 PM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas
The 17th is the single worst Constitutional Amendment every ratified. Bar none.

That assertion could lead to a fiery debate.I think the 16th -19th are all contenders,with the 14th not far behind.Of course the 18th was repealed,and the 19th should have been part of the repeal package.I don't know what was in the water during that decade.The 19th aqmendment is the one i would overturn if I had my way,even over the income tax.Women and government mix like oil and water."Welcome to kindergarden" is what signs should say greeting visitors to this country.

First the government convinced women to go out and compete against their husbands in the work place,and now we face the specter of federal government officials wasting our time and money discussing "the children".Repeal the 19th amendment!

48 posted on 06/05/2007 12:44:51 PM PDT by hschliemann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

Good article. I am also a very strong supporter of term limits for ALL elected offices and use of staff/office to seek re-election should be prohibited.


49 posted on 06/05/2007 12:49:29 PM PDT by KEmom (Please send viable Republican candidates to Massachusetts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

bump for later reading.


56 posted on 06/05/2007 1:10:48 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (We accommodate other cultures at the expense of ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

and on top of this, I think one of the dumbest things that happened was the changes to the primary system, that took the nominations out of the “smoke filled rooms” and put them in the public’s hand. The only ones that have won from that mess are the media and advertisers.


59 posted on 06/05/2007 1:22:42 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas
Another aspect of this problem is the amount of campaign donations that come from outside any particular state to fund a Senate run. Lieberman’s unrepresentative opponent was heavily funded by forces well outside the state instead of by the citizens who would actually elect him to office. This has the effect of driving the costs of running for office ever higher in key races.

That's why the biggest impact of repealing the 17th amendment is campaign finance reform. If you eliminate 33 of the most expensive elections that occur every two years, you eliminate the need to finance them, and in the process you dry up the money flow to the national parties in Washington.

-PJ

69 posted on 06/05/2007 2:12:32 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas
The choice was either to allow the popular election of Senators, or to watch the Senate, an "undemocratic" body, lose power. For inevitably, a Senate still chosen by state legislatures would increasingly come to look illegitimate to voters.

I'm not sure that the Senate did look after the interest of states before the Amendment was passed. The growing national economy helped make the Senate more representative of economic interests than of state governments.

What changed most with the Amendment was that Senators, having won state elections, came to think of themselves as presidential timber. Before that, Senators didn't have to be popular or attractive vote-getters and hence were rarely considered as presidential candidates.

73 posted on 06/05/2007 2:33:13 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas
The primary effect of this proposal would be to further increase the present overrepresentation of a rural voters in national politics.
82 posted on 06/05/2007 4:36:24 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas
"Another aspect of this problem is the amount of campaign donations that come from outside any particular state to fund a Senate run. Lieberman’s unrepresentative opponent was heavily funded by forces well outside the state instead of by the citizens who would actually elect him to office. This has the effect of driving the costs of running for office ever higher in key races."

Some people sure love to write about things they don't know about.

Lieberman raised 80% of his campaign contributions form out-of-state donors, the 23M Lieberman raised from these donors was more than six times the 3.5M Lamont raised from all donors.

84 posted on 06/05/2007 4:58:54 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

BTTT!


94 posted on 08/07/2007 2:00:45 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; ...

PING!


95 posted on 10/27/2007 5:08:09 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson