Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plunge in CD Sales Shakes Up Big Labels
NYTimes via Drudge ^ | May 28, 2007 | JEFF LEEDS

Posted on 05/28/2007 5:23:23 AM PDT by WL-law

“Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band,” the Beatles album often cited as the greatest pop recording in music history, received a thoroughly modern 40th-anniversary salute last week...

But off stage, in a sign of the recording industry’s declining fortunes, shareholders of EMI, the music conglomerate that markets “Sgt. Pepper” and a vast trove of other recordings, were weighing a plan to sell the company as its financial performance was weakening.

... Despite costly efforts to build buzz around new talent and thwart piracy, CD sales have plunged more than 20 percent this year, far outweighing any gains made by digital sales at iTunes and similar services. Aram Sinnreich, a media industry consultant at Radar Research in Los Angeles, said the CD format, introduced in the United States 24 years ago, is in its death throes. “Everyone in the industry thinks of this Christmas as the last big holiday season for CD sales,” Mr. Sinnreich said, “and then everything goes kaput.”

... Even as the industry tries to branch out, though, there is no promise of an answer to a potentially more profound predicament: a creative drought and a corresponding lack of artists who ignite consumers’ interest in buying music.

.... that is compounded by the industry’s core structural problem: Its main product is widely available free. More than half of all music acquired by fans last year came from unpaid sources including Internet file sharing and CD burning, according to the market research company NPD Group. The “social” ripping and burning of CDs among friends — which takes place offline and almost entirely out of reach of industry policing efforts — accounted for 37 percent of all music consumption, more than file-sharing, NPD said.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cds; filesharing; music; musicdownloads
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-216 next last
To: kjam22
$10 is a fair price. We've got two cds forsale for that price. 12 or 13 songs on each. It's cheaper than the itunes price of a dollar per song.

Actually that logic is faulty on several levels. You are assuming that every CD you buy has songs that you would have bought individually on iTunes. The fact is, most people who buy CDs listen to only half of the songs on them. The other half are "throwaways" that recording artists toss on their to round out an album.

It is a rarity in the music business to put out an album that is consistently good from beginning to end. So rare is this that most people have trouble coming up with 10 albums that meet this criteria. Even the majority of "classic" albums have at least a couple of stinkers on them. For example, take U2's most acclaimed album "The Joshua Tree." At least four of those songs are pretty awful.

So you actually get much more bang for your money by cherry picking what is good and paying $1 for the tracks individually. So instead of paying $10 for an album that has 12 or 13 songs, you can pay $10 on iTunes to get the best songs from 3 or 4 different albums (that would have cost $30 to $40 to buy as full CDs).

101 posted on 05/28/2007 7:25:14 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (I am 74 days away from outliving Curt Hennig (whoever he is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: tflabo
""I'm Dead

. I'm not a Dead fan per se, although I do like some of their stuff. As far as recording I've recorded off the radio and was quite satisfied with the end product.

102 posted on 05/28/2007 7:26:13 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
It's mostly computer generated, overly compressed and processed, garbage. That's the fundamental problem.

Right, and how did that happen to take over the music business? Well, when you have zero-talent headliners like Madonna making a career out of the visual rather than the musical, you have to fake the musical. Then the faking took over the industry.

103 posted on 05/28/2007 7:26:19 AM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
You'd never know this from all the talk about foreign companies dominating the auto industry, but GM's 1500-series trucks are the top-selling line of vehicles in the U.S. today -- and by a wide margin (though the Ford F-150 gets the top ranking because the sales figures for GM's Chevrolet and GMC models are listed separately).
104 posted on 05/28/2007 7:26:40 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

What iTunes, downloading, etc., has done is, in a manner of speaking, brought back the single, just not on a 45 RPM piece of vinyl anymore.


105 posted on 05/28/2007 7:27:01 AM PDT by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: WL-law

Because people are more interested in going to see a show and, in particular, see scantily-clad women flouncing around than they are in going for the music. I know someone who went to see a Britney Spears concert, told me that it was obvious to anyone with an ounce of gray matter between their ears that she was lip-synching the whole thing, but nobody cared because she was half-naked, dripping with sweat and shaking her booty. That’s what they came to see.


106 posted on 05/28/2007 7:29:00 AM PDT by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
"It used to be that record labels would invest several years in developing new artists, tolerating low sales for the first few albums in exchange for a big payoff later on when the artist finally achieved critical mass."

You post is all that one would need to see what is happening. There are still a few bands that are bucking all these trends. Wilco comes to mind. It is nothing but product now days. Sell and move one.

With Wilco:

They finish an Album (Yankee Foxtrot Hotel) and deliver it to Reprise Records (Time Warner)

Reprise says it sucks and wants massive changes,

Wilco says no.

Reprise dumps them.

Wilco buys back the Album and shops it.

Nonesuch, (another Time Warner company) buys it for even more money that Reprise could have.

The Album is a huge hit and Critics even love it.

The Short term profit model has infected the world of music and has destroyed it. They can now cry like a baby all they want. They killed the industry.

Music is just another form of media to buy. It is not important to people anymore. No Artists are singing for the current generation. It is all fast food.

107 posted on 05/28/2007 7:29:55 AM PDT by Afronaut (Press 2 for English - Thanks Mr. President !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut
Good stuff.

It's funny to see this thread this a.m., maybe there's a reason I've been listening to Sinatra all weekend. "Songs For Swinging Lovers" and "Only the Lonely" are definitely NOT fast food, which is the reason they sound absolutely as fresh and vital as they did when they were first released a half-century ago. That stuff has lasted. Little of the present-day stuff will, IMHO.

108 posted on 05/28/2007 7:33:02 AM PDT by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
And also when record execs told the Beatles to ditch Pete Best in favor of Richard Starkey.

??? How does THAT fit? Ringo was a better drummer, he wasn't picked for non-musical 'aesthetic' reasons, and the (other) Beatles themselves picked him to sit in, as I understand.

I can't see how the Beatles can come anywhere close to being a fitting subject matter in a discussion about what is WRONG with the music business. They were the high-water mark, by any reasonable measure, of the now-dying industry.

109 posted on 05/28/2007 7:34:07 AM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono
“... it started with the Ronettes ...”

Except that Ronnie Bennett can actually sing!

110 posted on 05/28/2007 7:34:12 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: WL-law

The music business was a great business back in the day. New companies were springing up as fast as new artists. The music created was revolutionary because there were risks that everyone, artist and record company were willing to take to get thier product out there. The fact that the baby boomer generation helped a great deal as well as the domestic and political turmoil of the 60’s thru the 70’s added to this also. Today it’s not about creating music it’s about image and conglomerate record companies looking for the bottom line. Most of the employee’s working for these companies are musicians themselves who never reached thier goals and are making command decisions on music coming into these companies at the lowest level. So is this a suprise to here? Not really, they have been on the road to suicide since the mid 70’s when disco made it’s debut. Yes, I was a musician back in the late 60’s through the 70’s, frustrated? no, angry ? yes, because I was involved when it was fun, exciting, creative, and rewarding. I guess all good things come to an end. Sorry for the run, it’s an emotional thang!


111 posted on 05/28/2007 7:34:42 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (I'd rather be hunting with dick than driving with ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: visualops
I love the fact that I don't have to pay for all the extraneous music on the CD, I can buy the song(s) that are good. Artists will have to be artists and REALLY make a LOT of good music, if they want to make money. I have found few CD's on which the music is original enough and worth purchasing the ENTIRE CD. Josh Groban, Maroon 5, Carrie Underwood--whole CD. All the tracks are good. Everyone else gets onsie/twosie purchases, because that's all the music I think is worth my money.

It's a beautiful thing....I can get on i-tunes and find artists that the labels aren't pushing. Radio is such politics and cash...most great artists never make it to mainstream airwaves. Downloading opens up the world to the vast array of music out there we would have never otherwise heard.

112 posted on 05/28/2007 7:35:21 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right! (THOMPSON '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jwpjr
My Baby Just Cares For Me and My Romance.
113 posted on 05/28/2007 7:36:11 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Vision
I’m a PC guy. Is there anywhere I can buy songs now at a cheap price without the protection software?

Um... why not from the EMI collection at the iTunes music store?

It's not just for Macs, you know....

- John

114 posted on 05/28/2007 7:39:28 AM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Fishrrman

I thought itunes were only for macs. Will check it out. Walmart’s loss.


115 posted on 05/28/2007 7:40:47 AM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: weef
Anyone with a computer and a little bit of talent can put together a CD very cheaply. Yes most of it's junk but there's quite a few gems out there too. Sadly most of which will never be heard.

And that's eventually where the state of music will find itself. Recording equipment has become so affordable that bands can record and mix their own songs and then upload them to their myspace page. This will require that at least one band member immerses himself in basic sound engineering. The band will then build a regional following by playing local venues. They won't become multi-millionaires but if they work hard at promoting themselves, they'll have fun, pick up chicks and might earn enough to scrape by.

I think in the next few years we will see an end to the millionaire pop star. There aren't really any bands that have come out in the last decade that can fill a stadium or arena on their own. All the money being made touring is either through festivals where a bunch of small bands play (and share the profits) or older, established acts from the 60s-80s.

116 posted on 05/28/2007 7:40:53 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: abb

There is a difference. The artists who make these CDs are entitled to the preservation of their intellectual property rights. Illegal piracy of their product should not be endorsed by anyone.


117 posted on 05/28/2007 7:41:12 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut
Music is just another form of media to buy. It is not important to people anymore. No Artists are singing for the current generation. It is all fast food.

Well, the record industry used to be the narrow cultural focal point through which everyone looked to obtain new music - now music can be had everywhere through thousands of independent channels, and Big Music has permanently lost its monopoly. Music isn't taught in schools much any more, so the public lacks the ability it might have collectively had in, say, the Fifties, to discriminate between good and bad.

Predictions of the death of the music industry are premature. I expect we are just undergoing a shift in focus: more bands on the low end able to make money by marketing and selling their recordings and performing live - and far fewer mega-acts raking in millions for the big record companies. It's that latter phenomenon that has Big Music crying in their appletinis. ;)

One trend that has been harmful is the conversion of rock/jazz oriented clubs over to techno/house/hip hop/DJ music - one DJ is cheaper to a club owner than hiring bands, and the format brings in a crowd that buys expensive drinks rahter than the $2 beers rock audiences prefer. Musicians have always made most of their money performing live - the recording is just a commerical for the live performance. Theoretically (Lars Ulrich's protests notwithstanding) a band should be able to make zero money from record sales and still do well from live performance revenues...if they can find any place left to play.

118 posted on 05/28/2007 7:45:05 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: WL-law

The artists are out there. They probably aren’t the ones the companies want to push.

The radio used to be the means for the cream to rise to the top. All of those old dj’s taking chances and making decisions on what to play when something new came across their desk helped the great unknowns to get their product out.

Lost freedom will ruin any market.


119 posted on 05/28/2007 7:51:06 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut
No Artists are singing for the current generation.

Jamie Cullem and John Mayer are two.

Problem is, their music is sophisticated, so most twenty-somethings (sorry) don't get to hear it.

120 posted on 05/28/2007 7:52:56 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson