1. Latin America is a "child" of the west, as Jeane Kirkpatrick has pointed out, among others. You have countries with a very heavy indigeenous influence (southern Mexico, Bolivia), and those with a heavily African influence (Brazil, Puerto Rico), but the political institutions and social mores are "western." This is NOT the case with the Chinese, Arabs, Pakis, etc.
2. Euro-peons aren't exactly producing children, nor are they showing much initiative in anything other than producing bloated aircraft subsidized by the taxpayer.
3. Better an Indian with a brain and a knowledge of capital formation than a pedantic Frenchman anyday of the week.
Build a fence, AGGRESSIVELY enforce labor laws on businesses, and deport when possible, to say nothing of ending family reunification. No amnesty, no race baiting (on EITHER side of the issue).
You’re a xenophone...Juan Williams told me so!
India is a more advanced country than the Latin ones in this sense: It seems they care more about learning and earning as opposed to revolution and crime.
India is a child of Great Britain, as are we, Australia, NZ and Canada. India and Australia have more in common with us in terms of the will to fight.