Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Anger Of The Left (Thomas Sowell)
Townhall.com ^ | May 15, 2007 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 05/14/2007 9:09:51 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: jazusamo
"..If it is hard to find a principle behind what angers the left, it is not equally hard to find an attitude.
Their greatest anger seems to be directed at people and things that thwart or undermine the social vision of the left, the political melodrama starring the left as saviors of the poor, the environment, and other busybody tasks that they have taken on."

Just wanted to repeat it.

41 posted on 05/14/2007 11:58:05 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
"... those damned conservatives didn’t let us implement it completely, or the wrong people tried implementing it"

Reminds me of a Berkeley communist with whom I once had a little chat.

This was about 10 years ago.

When I told him that communism had failed everywhere, he said, "No, it hasn't. It's never been tried."

42 posted on 05/15/2007 12:20:26 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sand88
“The evil left hates Liberty and Capitalism.”

For sure. And, let’s not forget how much they hate the 2nd Amendment which empowers the Great Unwashed which the Left is scared to death of. If the Hildabeast is elected POTUS be assured she will make an attempt to have it rescinded or neutered in some fashion.

43 posted on 05/15/2007 12:33:20 AM PDT by snoringbear (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bush gal in LA
"the debate is over"

Absolutely correct. That statement is even more amazing considering that there never was any debate. The global warming doomists simply announced their verdict before any real discussion could begin. There is now a growing number of scientists and informed people who are quite skeptical. The debate is definitely NOT!!! over.

44 posted on 05/15/2007 2:00:15 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

All of this Leftist anger is more understandable when you realize that the purpose of socialism is not equal prosperity, but equal suffering, pain, and death.

They won’t be happy until they’re supervising the killing fields.


45 posted on 05/15/2007 3:34:38 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Mash here folks...

http://samvak.tripod.com/journal10.html

“I feel entitled to more. I feel it is my right - due to my intellectual superiority - to lead a thrilling, rewarding, kaleidoscopic life. I feel entitled to force life itself, or, at least, people around me - to yield to my wishes and needs, supreme among them the need for stimulating variety.

This rejection of habit is part of a larger pattern of aggressive entitlement. I feel that the very existence of a sublime intellect (such as myself) warrants concessions and allowances. Standing in line is a waste of time best spent pursuing knowledge, inventing and creating. I should avail myself of the best medical treatment proffered by the most prominent medical authorities - lest the asset that is I be lost to Mankind. I should not be bothered with proofreading my articles (or even re-reading them) - these lowly jobs best be assigned to the less gifted. The devil is in paying precious attention to details.

Entitlement is sometimes justified in a Picasso or an Einstein. But I am neither. My achievements are grotesquely incommensurate with my overwhelming sense of entitlement. I am but a mediocre and forgettable scribbler who, at the age of 39, is a colossal under-achiever, if anything.

Of course, the feeling of supremacy often serves to mask a cancerous complex of inferiority. Moreover, I infect others with my projected grandiosity and their feedback constitutes the edifice upon which I construct my self-esteem. I regulate my sense of self-worth by rigidly insisting that I am above the madding crowd while deriving my Narcissistic Supply from this very thus despised source.

But there is a second angle to this abhorrence of the predictable. As a narcissist, I employ a host of Emotional Involvement Prevention Mechanisms (EIPM). Despising routine and avoiding it is one of these mechanisms. Their function is to prevent me from getting emotionally involved and, subsequently, hurt. Their application results in an “approach-avoidance repetition complex”. The narcissist, fearing and loathing intimacy, stability and security - yet craving them - approaches and then avoids significant others or important tasks in a rapid succession of apparently inconsistent and disconnected behaviours.”


46 posted on 05/15/2007 3:52:04 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Tax cuts enhance revenue only in the long term, and liberals stupidly believe that such long-term revenue enhancement would have been even greater absent tax cuts, that the American people essentially enjoy paying taxes and do not attempt to avoid confiscatory levels thereof.


47 posted on 05/15/2007 4:50:53 AM PDT by dufekin (Name the leader of our enemy: Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, terrorist dictator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Reminds me of a Berkeley communist with whom I once had a little chat.

When I told him that communism had failed everywhere, he said, "No, it hasn't. It's never been tried."

You should have told him, "Communism has succeeded everywhere it has been tried - what's worse, when people found out what the success of communism meant, it has taken them decades to get out from under it."

Communism - all socialism - is nothing more than the use of power (in the case of milder forms of socialism such as is called "liberalism" in America, PR power) to arrogate credit from those who deserve it to those who have that power. All socialist schemes are perpetual-motion machines which "work" only in the sense that the perpetrators of the schemes are able to deflect blame for the ill effects of their schemes onto third parties.

For example, the minimum wage is actually always zero, which is what you get when you are not employed. When the socialist raises the "minimum wage," the socialist gets the credit for the raises that young workers get at that time which they would have gotten anyway a little later. If the employer never ever would have voluntarily paid that particular employee the new "minimum wage," the employer would have resorted to his only other recourse, which would have been to fire that employee. More generally, an increase in the "minimum wage" raises the bar for the productivity of the entry-level worker - who must then show greater credentials, or at least greater prospects, than before in order to justifiy being initially employed at the higher "minimum wage" rather than remaining unemployed at the true minimum wage of zero.

Socialism exists to make socialists look good to people who don't ask the second question.
The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing . . .

It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity, and they very seldom teach it enough. - Adam Smith


48 posted on 05/15/2007 5:03:55 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s also amazing how illiberal these leftists are. True liberals tolerate, even encourage debate. They would want the people of Afghanistan and Iraq to be free. They wouldn’t tolerate the government telling us what to eat or think. These aren’t really liberals, they’re leftists.


49 posted on 05/15/2007 5:06:56 AM PDT by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sand88; hellinahandcart
If the left wins, the US will cease to be a Republic. God help us if Hillary wins.

Bears repeating.

50 posted on 05/15/2007 5:08:24 AM PDT by sauropod ("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dufekin
liberals stupidly believe that such long-term revenue enhancement would have been even greater absent tax cuts

It always goes back to the age-old question, "Are they evil or are they just stupid?"

51 posted on 05/15/2007 5:27:24 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Thanks for posting Dr. Sowell’s brilliant observations! He gets it right, yet again!


52 posted on 05/15/2007 5:27:44 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (If you don't have borders, you won't have a nation- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Left is perpetually angry because they view themselves as superior, and cannot understand how they keep losing to inferiors.


53 posted on 05/15/2007 5:41:44 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“What is surprising, however, is how often the opinions of those on the left are accompanied by hostility and even hatred.”

While the Left has always hated Ronald Reagan, they didn’t exude hatred every time they opened their collective mouths as they do today with George Bush, or Dick Cheney, or Karl Rove.

Seven years ago, you could engage an avowed liberal in forums like this, and most of the time have a fairly civil ‘conversation’. Those days are long gone however.

Now, in forums that allow all sides of a political debate, the Leftwingers mount campaigns against specific posters, from the harmless ‘just don’t respond’ to more aggressive acts, such as finding a posters email address and spamming those they disagree with. Sometimes goes even farther than that, still relatively harmless, but initially annoying action.

Whats curious to me is the Left won the last election cycle, and they appear even more angry today than last September.

Its almost mass hysteria, in short.

The good news is this type of irrationality causes the Left to overstep, to misread, and to exhibit infantile behavior normally expected by spoiled sixth graders.

That should work in the GOP’s favor when the time comes in 2008.

Just look at how vicious the discourse in the leftwing forums has become in regards to their own candidates.


54 posted on 05/15/2007 5:47:57 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Why do liberals/leftists hate? Envy and resentment.


55 posted on 05/15/2007 5:50:02 AM PDT by ZeitgeistSurfer (Insult your Intelligence - Read the New York Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sand88

Hillary as President, Bill as Secretary General, the US taken over for the “common good” by the UN during some trumped up “emergency”- find my tinfoil hat, please.


56 posted on 05/15/2007 5:52:03 AM PDT by steve8714 ("A man needs a maid", my ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Communism works if the right people implement it. It seems to work for the Hutterites. Other than their toothbrushes, they have few personal possessions and only a small stipend of income:

Community of Goods:
"Hutterites live in community, that is they share all of their possessions; The idea of Community of Goods stems from many examples found in the bible, including the following:

"And all that believed were together, and had all things common; And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. And they, continuing daily, with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, Praising God, and having favor with all people."

Hutterian Community

57 posted on 05/15/2007 5:55:04 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This man is an icon, and clean too.

Pray for W and Our Troops


58 posted on 05/15/2007 5:57:55 AM PDT by bray (The co-clintons freed more terrorists than they killed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“it is hard to find a principal behind what angers the left....”

the left may be unprincipled but the factor which underlies leftist anger is pure, unadulterated, unvarnished, insanity; the insanity of the eternal adolescent, the insanity of an up-bringiing with no regard for reality except the internal reality of sick beings, distorted to the point of demanding continnual gratification and fulfillment based upon visceral need as is a rabid animal.

leave it to the so-called “american electorate” to contiinue to elect animals who will be the insane pigs at the trough of “social justice” who will open the gulags in order to find eternal social justice, ad nauseum.


59 posted on 05/15/2007 6:04:04 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Bumperoo!


60 posted on 05/15/2007 6:44:44 AM PDT by roaddog727 (BullS##t does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson