You're a decent chap, but I've just never understood this particularly puzzling thing about you not knowing the fundamentals of the JFK assassination.
All the silly conspiracy theories regarding the JFK Assassination are ~caused~ by the silly Warren Report theories that Oswald could have made the 'magic bullet' shots as alleged [by Allen Specter].
It's highly doubtful that Oswald would have been convicted from the evidence presented.
You've just never really studied the facts of the assassination, tpaine.
I've been studying the evidence since '64, when the botched Report first came out. Several days after its publication I pointed out [in a published letter to the editor] the ~fact~ of a mismatch with the holes in JFK's clothing and the wound in the back of his 'neck', as per photos/drawings in the Report.
There is no 'magic bullet'.
Specter says different. Read the report itself for his fanciful 'explanation'; - which was actually speculation.
It all makes sense. All the evidence you need has been around for two generations.
The reports crucial 'evidence' has been under credible dispute since its publication. Much of the fundamental evidence is flawed.
You're a decent chap, but I've just never understood this particularly puzzling thing about you not knowing the fundamentals of the JFK assassination.
I've never understood the puzzling 'thing' you fellas have about defending obviously flawed portions of the Report. Why does it bother you so much when us 'decent chaps' dispute the 'official version'?