Skip to comments.
“...Find Caches of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Absolutely.” - Tenet on Zarqawi.
National Review Online ^
| April 28, 2007
| Victor Davis Hanson
Posted on 04/30/2007 10:10:54 AM PDT by neverdem
April 28, 2007, 1:21 a.m.
...Find Caches of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Absolutely.” Tenet on Zarqawi.
By Victor Davis Hanson
Like most Americans, I am confused about the recent public announcements of George Tenet — not the usual Beltway “he said/she said” sort of accusations and meae culpae that we are accustomed from former officials plugging “inside story” memoirs, but how exactly we are now to digest past statements in light of present behavior.
Surely Tenet had some free will, and when he testified under oath to congressional committees in February 2003 are we now to think such statements were misleading, untrue, or coerced by Dick Cheney — or do some remain absolutely accurate to this day?
Among the many accounts of his critical prewar testimony is the Dana Priest’s February 12, 2003, story in the Washington Post. My point in quoting it is not to show the obvious “that was then, this is now” attitude of Tenet, but to focus on his seemingly prescient warning about Zarqawi. His was a sober assessment, that however orphaned it may be now, seems in the light of history to have stood up pretty well. I highlight the relevant pieces of the February 2003 prewar article by Priest.
“CIA Director George J. Tenet, questioned about the value of ongoing inspections by the United Nations, said there is “little chance you’ll find weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq unless Hussein cooperates with inspectors. On the other hand, Tenet said he would expect U.S. troops “will find caches of weapons of mass destruction, absolutely,” were they to invade the country.
If the United States decides not to go to war with Iraq and instead waits on inspectors, Hussein will continue developing weapons of mass destruction, Tenet said. “He will continue to strengthen himself over time,” he said. “It never gets any better with this fellow, and he’s never been a status quo guy.”
Tenet also elaborated on the CIA’s understanding of Iraq’s link to al Qaeda, a central issue in the administration’s case for going to war against Iraq in the near future, as opposed to waiting months longer for the U.N. inspectors to do more work. Tenet described Abu Musab Zarqawi, the main character in the administration’s case that Iraq is working with al Qaeda now, as it had not done in the past, as a “senior al Qaeda associate.” Zarqawi sought medical care in Baghdad, has met with Osama bin Laden, has been financially supported by al Qaeda and has taken “sustenance” from Iraq. But Zarqawi, he pointed out, is not under the control of Hussein.”
Both the description of Zarqawi as a threat with al Qaeda links and enjoying sanctuary in Iraq without being under the control of Saddam Hussein seems born out by his later deadly career and blustering letters to al Qaeda heads. So why the contrition now on that casus belli? Al Qaeda was responsible for killing 3,000 Americans; one of its worst terrorists was freely enjoying sanctuary in Iraq; what has changed about that fact? |
|
- font>
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: iraq; slamdunk; tenet; vdh; victordavishanson; wmd; zarqawi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
IMHO, I thought that was Tenet on WMD, but Zarqawi will suffice. CBS' 60 Minutes interview with Tenet was abysmal, from the claim that Valerie Plame was a current covert agent to the refusal to acknowledge reports of the WMD being evacuated prior to the invasion.
1
posted on
04/30/2007 10:10:56 AM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I didn’t watch it. He claimed VP is a current covert agent? How covert can one be when you drive to the CIA everyday? Tenet must be looking for a position in a future Democrat administration. You’d think he would have had enough.
2
posted on
04/30/2007 10:21:00 AM PDT
by
Aria
(NO RAPIST ENABELER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
To: neverdem
Tenet was bought with money or threats, perhaps both. Or maybe he has just been a lefty moe all along.
3
posted on
04/30/2007 10:31:55 AM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
To: neverdem
This obsession with finding weapons of mass destruction ignores the most important part of nuclear weapons development: the workforce necessary to design and assemble them.
The scientists, engineers, technicians, and assembly line workers are far more important than the physical materials. As long as Saddam kept his workforce intact, he would have been able to restart nuclear weapons development at any time.
4
posted on
04/30/2007 10:34:25 AM PDT
by
quadrant
To: quadrant
Exactly right.
Saddam regime did not produce the final Chemical Weapons products but was producing and researching the ingredients called Chemical Precursors required to make the final Chemical Weapons. The production of these Chemical Precursors took place from 1999-2002. They did so because if caught they can always claim that these dual materials are for civilian industries and also to deceive the people on these materials that they are doing so for civilian industries, also because the ingredients ( Chemical Precursors) have longer shelf life in storage than the final Chemical weapons. They produced these Precursors under a program called Pharmaceutical and Pesticides Project to give it a civilian industry name and for deception purposes as they called their previous nuclear program the Petrochemical 3 Project.
Saddam regime hid these Chemical Precursors in the Anbar province also called the Western desert.
The above conclusions and analysis are based on the many Iraqi documents that I read. I will not publicly post the possible locations of the Chemical Precursors as based on three documents I read, and that is because of security concerns. The terrorists who are very active in the Anbar province can get hold to these very dangerous chemical Precursors if they know its locations.
5
posted on
04/30/2007 10:37:02 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Aria
Tenet refused to comment on Plame in particular, but said outing a CIA agent was wrong.
To: neverdem
Tenent is a Plaming Liberal
7
posted on
04/30/2007 10:47:53 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
To: operation clinton cleanup
Tenet refused to comment on Plame in particular, but said outing a CIA agent was wrong. So what did he recommend be done to his buddy Richard Armitage, since he is the one that "outed" Plame.
8
posted on
04/30/2007 10:58:00 AM PDT
by
VRWCmember
(Go Rudy Go! (And take McCain with you!))
To: neverdem
Great points made by Mr. Hansen. Thanks for posting.
9
posted on
04/30/2007 11:01:25 AM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: Tolik
Harsh Iraqi Reaction ExpectedOn the other hand, Tenet said he would expect U.S. troops will find caches of weapons of mass destruction, absolutely, were they to invade the country.
It's in the 5th paragraph.
10
posted on
04/30/2007 11:16:03 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
I
DO NOT UNDERSTAND why Republicans in the Senate will not ask some nut-cuttin questions like:
- Mr Tenet, when you testified in 2003, BEFORE the invasion of Iraq, that the U.S. "will find caches of weapons of mass destruction, absolutely", did you believe what you were saying?
- Mr Tenet, when you testified in 2003, BEFORE the invasion of Iraq, that the U.S. "will find caches of weapons of mass destruction, absolutely", were you saying that because someone at the Whitehouse TOLD you to say that?
- "Mr Tenet, when you testified in 2003, BEFORE the invasion of Iraq, that the U.S. "will find caches of weapons of mass destruction, absolutely", did you knowingly lie to the United States Congress when you said that?
Will someone PLEASE give the Republican Senators their brains, and their GUTS, back?
11
posted on
04/30/2007 11:27:59 AM PDT
by
Bryan24
(When in doubt, move to the right....)
To: quadrant
The scientists, engineers, technicians, and assembly line workers are far more important than the physical materials. As long as Saddam kept his workforce intact, he would have been able to restart nuclear weapons development at any time.Don't forget about the nuclear weapons program and material that Libya gave up so quickly once Saddam could not strong arm them anymore.
12
posted on
04/30/2007 12:05:47 PM PDT
by
jdsteel
(Global Climate Change... for about 4.5 Billion years now and still going strong!)
To: neverdem; Lando Lincoln; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; SJackson; dennisw; monkeyshine; Alouette; ...
13
posted on
04/30/2007 12:05:54 PM PDT
by
Tolik
To: operation clinton cleanup
“Tenet refused to comment on Plame in particular, but said outing a CIA agent was wrong.”
Then tenet should seek the head of powell and armitage, since it was THOSE TWO LOSERS and novak that leaked her name! tenet is a dim and therefore the TRUTH is NOT in him!
LLS
14
posted on
04/30/2007 12:11:49 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(He is and always has been a dim.)
To: jveritas
Most people don’t realize how close most chemical weapons are in composition to common chemicals like pesticides and polyurethane paints. It’s not too hard to create a “dual use” chemical industry.
To: VRWCmember; LibLieSlayer
So what did he recommend be done to his buddy Richard Armitage, since he is the one that "outed" Plame.I know you will be shocked, but the name Armitage never came up in the whole interview! (at least the parts CBS chose to air)
To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
17
posted on
04/30/2007 8:03:06 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fedora; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; Seadog Bytes; ...
18
posted on
04/30/2007 8:09:24 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Saturday, April 28, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: neverdem
One has to take what a person that looks like this says with a grain of salt. Perhaps a mug of salt!
19
posted on
04/30/2007 8:29:57 PM PDT
by
TexKat
((Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.))
To: neverdem
Reported $4 mil advance
20
posted on
04/30/2007 8:37:42 PM PDT
by
TexKat
((Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson