Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEMS ON 'WAR'PATH VS. RUDY - FURY OVER 'SAFER GOP'
New York Post ^ | April 26, 2007 | MAGGIE HABERMAN

Posted on 04/26/2007 3:03:19 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

April 26, 2007 -- Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama laced into Rudy Giuliani yesterday after the GOP front-runner sparked an uproar by declaring America would be more vulnerable to a terror attack with a Democrat in the White House.

Former Sen. John Edwards and the Democratic National Committee also joined in on the anti-Rudy romp, accusing him of politicizing the war on terror in a daylong brawl.

Giuliani chuckled about the swirl of Democratic outrage about his comments, which put the media focus squarely on his strongest point - his 9/11 performance.

"It sounds like I hit at least a triple," Giuliani told radio host Sean Hannity. "I was trying for a home run, but I think I got at least a triple - meaning I have got the three leading Democratic candidates attacking me."

The flap started after Giuliani said in a speech in New Hampshire on Tuesday night that the nation will defeat terrorism no matter who wins in 2008, but that the Democrats want to "wave the white flag."

He told the Web site Politico.com that America will be "safer with a Republican president."

... Giuliani insisted he wasn't questioning the Democrats' patriotism, but added, "Everything I said is absolutely true - they want to retreat in Iraq."

He claimed that the Democrats "do not seem to get the fact there are . . . really dangerous people who want to come here and kill us. That, in fact, they did come here and kill us twice, and they got away with it because we were on defense, because we weren't alert enough to the dangers."

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: campaign; giuliani; rudytroll; stoprudy2008; wot; zotbait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-220 next last
To: LibLieSlayer
“....Democrats can not be allowed to take the White House!”...

Bump!

81 posted on 04/26/2007 4:39:02 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: bray
.....Pray for W and Our Troops

Bump!!!

82 posted on 04/26/2007 4:39:41 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
Here is another one for you: Rudy on gun manufacturers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zs5DxwzEXHQ
83 posted on 04/26/2007 4:40:05 AM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Have been pretty much away from any news sources........are you posting that Edwards actually accused Rudy of politicizing the war on terror?

Edwards actually said those words????????????


84 posted on 04/26/2007 4:40:22 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem; Cincinatus' Wife

I am by far NOT a fan of Rudy and will not vote for him in the primary’s, however with that said I stand by my statement.

Most if not all Republicans in office right now are spineless jellyfish and the ones that aren’t jellyfish have no balls.

Hunter has stepped out a little with his call for Reid to resign, but he must be feeling very exposed with no support from any others, and he also needs to step it up more.


85 posted on 04/26/2007 4:40:42 AM PDT by stockpirate (Congress should MANDATE the right to carry concealed weapons in ALL schools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

America not only isn’t ready for a Dem in the White House, we cannot afford one, in more ways than one.

I haven’t chosen a GOP candidate for president to support yet, and I will support and vote for the GOP nominee. That said, I applaud Giuliani’s statements. Clearly they hit home because the rats are squealin’.


86 posted on 04/26/2007 4:41:10 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

He’s been pretty on target, IMO.

He just doesn’t get the coverage that Rudy gets.

THe MSM is prepping Rudy for his eventual destruction.


87 posted on 04/26/2007 4:41:20 AM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: wgflyer

You have to feel sorry for the Rats, its been tough since the Wall fell.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


88 posted on 04/26/2007 4:41:36 AM PDT by bray (The Surge is Working against both Enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Most Democrats ARE patriotic...
French-style...
***

I think most rank and file democrats are patriotic people. The dem leadership, however, has surrendered its patriotism at the altar of votes, time and time again. It is fun to see them react when called on it.


89 posted on 04/26/2007 4:43:26 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Kind of funny.

First you say no other Republican has the balls to step up, and when I show you that Hunter has, you say he needs to step up more.


90 posted on 04/26/2007 4:43:54 AM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
“....Democrats can not be allowed to take the White House!”

Amazing how many so-called Freepers get miffed at that statement! It is the most important truth of our lifetimes!

What FReepers get "miffed" at is the idea that electing a liberal Democrat who simply happens to call himself a Republican is any better than electing a liberal Democrat who's at least honest about it.

I maintain it's actually worse, because if the Republicans won't stand up for conservatism, we know the Democrats sure as heck won't.

91 posted on 04/26/2007 4:44:05 AM PDT by kevkrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith; johnny7
Rudy is at least correct about this.

This is the vexing thing about Giuliani.

There's an earlier post this morning linked to a YouTube vid, showing Giuliani announcing the NYC lawsuit against gun manufacturers in 2000. Watching him, you'd think you're listening to Chuck Schumer.

Then he comes out with both guns blazing against our active enemies both here and abroad.

I have trouble reconciling these two Giulianis, unless it's that he's a superbly adaptable and cynical politician willing to cater to whomever elects him.

92 posted on 04/26/2007 4:48:18 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

You’re right. You have to take a swing to draw out your opponent.


93 posted on 04/26/2007 4:51:00 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: angkor
I have trouble reconciling these two Giulianis, unless it's that he's a superbly adaptable and cynical politician willing to cater to whomever elects him

"willing to cater to whomever elects him" -- that's a politician's job.

"he's a superbly adaptable and cynical politician " -- that's probably a true statement.

Remember, he's been a New Yorker. You don't get elected to anything there unless you're a little to the left of Bernie Sanders.

PS ~ before I get 4,200 anti-Gulliani flames -- I am not a Guilliani supporter.

However, unlike many on this site -- if he's the candidate I will vote for him.
94 posted on 04/26/2007 4:54:24 AM PDT by Beckwith (dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Rudy speaks the truth. RATS cannot be trusted with our security. Just look at what Harry Reed (Mr. White Flag) and Nancy (meet with thuggish dictators) Pelosi have done once they gain power. All three of the RAT pres candidates are Nevile Chamberlain “Peace in Our Time” clones.
95 posted on 04/26/2007 4:57:35 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen
My views are 180 degrees from his and he couldn't get my vote on a bet.

I couldn't vote for him either; I don't think he is "presidential," among other more important issues. However, he would make a stellar Attorney General. Talk about the perfect person for the perfect spot. He would drive the Dims crazy!

96 posted on 04/26/2007 5:02:05 AM PDT by MSSC6644 (Defeat Satan. Pray the Rosary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: section9
.Rudy just told the Clintons: "I am NOT intimidated by you, and I am NOT backing down. Welcome to New York!"

Love it. Love Rudy!
97 posted on 04/26/2007 5:03:34 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Like many others, I am troubled by some of Rudy’s positions on typically strong conservative issues (abortion, guns, etc). That said, the two main issues in the next presidential election are national security and supreme court justice nominating rights. On the national security issue I feel good about all of the GOP candidates, and none of the Dem candidates. On supreme court justice nomination power, I feel better about all of the GOP candidates than any of the Dem candidates, but I have concerns about what Rudy and McCain would do with nominations. I think Hunter, Romney and Thompson would likely nominate more conservative justices, in line with Alito and Roberts.

Gun control is not a hot topic in Congress (the dems are afraid of it), and I see states making the next forays into abortion legislation. Rudy is weak on those issues, but I think he would be strong on national security.


98 posted on 04/26/2007 5:05:12 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Amen, bro. I’ve said for two months now that the GOP candidate who FIGHTS the Dems and who is perceived as fighting the DEMS will win, hands down. I’d prefer to see Fred get in the race, but if Rudy is the only one who will attack the Dems forcefully and consistently, more power to him.


99 posted on 04/26/2007 5:05:47 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: angkor
I have trouble reconciling these two Giulianis...

I knew Bush wouldn't do a damn thing about our borders either back in 2000... but I had to overlook it. I had to go with who would be the best candidate to stop the madness of 8 years of Clinton. Early on in the primary, I was leaning toward Alan Keyes... but Keyes never got out of the box.

I like Duncan Hunter right now... but come Nov. 2008 and it's Rooty against The Beast(or any Dem)... I'll vote Giuliani.

100 posted on 04/26/2007 5:06:06 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson