To: jveritas
Thanks! What about my other point? I like your analysis but I have problems with that one point. Was hoping you might have more insight as to why Bush denies WMD. A subject that drives me nuts.
14 posted on
04/23/2007 11:34:23 AM PDT by
Lee'sGhost
(Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
To: Lee'sGhost; jveritas
bump, and I have the same question as L’s G ...
15 posted on
04/23/2007 11:36:34 AM PDT by
bassmaner
(Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
To: Lee'sGhost; bassmaner
The President said that no stockpiles of WMD were found and that is true. I think he should make the case that Saddam was working in building all the precursors required to build the Chemical Weapons because that is an undeniable fact as we have seen from the documents. However in my opinion, the President has a lot on his plate and he wants to win the war in the field rather than go back and argue about the WMD issue.
Also regarding WMD moved to a foreign country, I doubt it because of Saddam regime extreme paranoia and distrust. He was afraid that if he give a certain country the precursors to make WMD this country can make a deal with the US to turn the materials in exchange of money or other favors.
21 posted on
04/23/2007 11:58:36 AM PDT by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Lee'sGhost
The Bush Administration has a philosophy of “Life can be understood backwards but it must be lived forwards.” They know this evidence exists but chooses only to use it as a last resort when news breaks on the topic.
They get the pounced on by the left wing media and Democrats unless the facts presents itself at the right moment.
To: Lee'sGhost
Why tell the enemy that they can find WMD in the desert just like we have?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson