Replies

Great post. :) Sorry this is so long. I appreciate your reading. :) Just curious on your thoughts. Personally I hope for Fred Thompson but that said.....

I think Hillary as President is the factor that has this entire thread debating... not Rudy Giuliani. The fear of her becoming president runs deep. Those 8 years of those people, and what the media has done to Bush and the loss of the midterm elections makes reality a bit scary. There are terrorists out there who can't wait to have another chance to kill us here. We have Reid, Pelosi and others. How frightening a thought is it should a liberal have control.

After 9/11 to have Sheehan and other liberals actually heard. Then Congress trying to fight funding for our Heroes, Troops. This is a sick world we live in. I don't want a 9/11 or worse to come. I live close to Manhattan. Lost loved ones that day. Here's only one heartbreaking example...A young waitress sweet young girl working while going to college, at Windows on the World. One last phone call....I'm ok. My husband was on a plane that very morning at the same time. Thank God he landed safely. It was a long time to know this.

We need someone to win. That is why I felt bad for some of those who have been banned. This what motivates many to defend Rudy. They think he has a chance to beat Hilde-beast. If he is the nominee, I'll vote for him. Example is Bob Dole running against Clinton in 96. Good guy or bad guy he wasn't going to win over Clinton. He never should have been the nominee. People wanted his wife. We needed to beat Clinton then. Things could have been different now had we. People fear what will happen with WOT, if a not totally conservative is running, so do they over look certain issues... that may be. Personally I think when Rudy Giuliani says he will only nominate Constitutionalists judges, I believe him. He will leave those issues to the states. Most importantly... What about our Brave Troops. I feel ill when I think they could be sold out. Someone to sell us out like the Clinton's have done. 8 years later and America is still paying for the Clintons.

“We need someone to win. That is why I felt bad for some of those who have been banned. This what motivates many to defend Rudy. They think he has a chance to beat Hilde-beast.”

The thing is he is nearly parallel to the Hildabeast on his positions. They are both liberals. What have you won if you’ve compromised all your principles to do so?

“People fear what will happen with WOT, if a not totally conservative is running, so do they over look certain issues... that may be.”

You basically have to look over all issues and vote solely on the WOT to vote for Guiliani. Even then, what are his real qualifications at fighting terror? He fought crime in NYC, but what has he done to evidence he can fight the global WOT? He recently commented that we could lose in Iraq and still succeed in the WOT. How could that be? He did a good job on 9/11, but did he really do anything that any mayor wouldn’t do as far as clean up and attending funerals? There are other candidates running that have a solid knowledge of the WOT. McCain has been its biggest supporter, not that I’m supporting McCain. Hunter is head of the House Armed Services Committee, and he served himself. I think he would be qualified.

“Personally I think when Rudy Giuliani says he will only nominate Constitutionalists judges, I believe him. He will leave those issues to the states.”

He appointed mostly liberal judges while in NYC. Also, he says that he thinks women should ultimately have the choice for abortion. He says judges could interpret Roe vs. Wade as good or bad, and he claims Ginsberg (ardent pro-abort) is a good judge.

Ultimately, there are better candidates that are conservative on most issues who would be just as qualified to fight the WOT.