[SandRat]

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

A RESOUNDING NO on both counts. Let's join together for Conservatism and a Conservative Candidate. Let's not settle for what the media/social intelligentsia want us to settle for.

[streetpreacher]

I know you to be a loyal Republican. The fact that Rudy is affecting you and other loyalists this way tells me that for the first time in modern politics, the GOP runs the risk of allowing a true third party threat to take shape in 2008. They won’t be able to win but it will ensure a Hillary presidency. She must be loving the idea of a Rudy nomination.

[Man50D]

You should reconsider your support for a socialist like Guiliani.

[Charles Henrickson]

Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

In the latest FR poll, Giuliani is only getting about 6-7% of members' opinion. The vast majority of us are NOT on board with Rudy the RINO. I would vote third party before I would vote for a pro-abort, pro-homo candidate who doesn't understand the Constitution.

[Inyo-Mono]

Do you really expect me to do that?

No! Nor will I!!!

[RetiredArmy]

Despite the global warming B.S., hell has yet to freeze over, so NO, Rudi does not get my vote. Only when hell has frozen over will Rudi, McScream or any other Marxist LIBERAL get my vote!!!

[Godebert]

"Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party? Do you really expect me to do that?"

Well......you supported Arnold over the Conservative McClintock. So I'll believe it when I see it.

[Popman]

Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party

if?

That barn door has been opened

Just depends on how mamy d'rats and RINO's can get in before conservatives shut the door

[Enosh]

No.

God Bless.

[Shelayne]

Do you really expect me to do that?

No way! I would expect you to keep up the good fight!

Thanks for the encouraging post. It has been quite alarming to me how many self-proclaimed conservatives are willing to sacrifice their deeply held beliefs and principles to support a candidate that is more palatable to the left. I just don't understand that at all.

[buccaneer81]

At this point it’s Fred for me. He’s electable, and he seems to pass Ronald Reagan’s 80% rule.

[Paperdoll]

PING

[nmh]

“Do you think I’m going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?”

I’m with ya!

I also see your concern of Demoncrats in drag pretending to be Republicans ... using the scare tactic of “want Hillary in there”? LOL! NOW is the time to weed out the Demoncrats in drag posing as Republicans and clean up the cultural and moral debauchery that the Rudy’s and McPain's of the world promote.

Hopefully Fred will run!

[VaRepublican]

Watch out Jim the rudy bots will get you banned.

[netmilsmom]

No way would I vote for him even if he was the nominee.
I’m with Thompson.

[Dr.Zoidberg]

Do you really expect me to do that?

Me? No.

However I'm not one of those trying to redefine conservatism into some bastard hybrid of libertarianism and old school marxism.

They, well yeah, they expect you to STFU and get your head right or suffer the consequences.

[2ndDivisionVet]

If we must set up a third party and run a Ronald Reagan type candidate, so be it. Voting for Rudy would probably be worse than pulling the lever for Hillary/Obama/Silky Pony, since his win would have the imprimatur of the so-called “conservative” GOP and he would face less opposition in leading the country further towards socialism.

[Vision]

Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Rock on you crazy diamond!

[infidel29]

And should he get the nomination anyways do you forfeit your duty and honor and stay home instead of voting, thus clearing the path for a marxist to do all those things to the country with the backing of the congress and the courts?

I still can't fathom the idea of not supporting a candidate who goes the right way half the time over a candidate who does none of the time.

I don't support Rudy, but I'll vote for him if I have to just to keep a true 100% socialist out of the White House. Call me a political prostitute, but I still believe in the America I remember and the democrats will take that away from me.

[GSlob]

Unless we subscribe to radically different definitions of “socialism” [on the basis of my experiences in USSR of accursed memory I would associate it with the leftist collectivism; although the not-so-leftist Nazis also used “socialist” in their name - so it probably needs to be associated with collectivism pure and simple]- so, unless you happen to use some different definition of what ‘socialism”/”socialist” means, I find it implausible to associate Rudy with the meaning of ‘socialism” I learned by my own skin while living under it. His known position on taxation, for example, is diametrically opposite to collectivist levelling/redistribution mantra. Socialism is hillary’s “we are going to take your things away for the common good”. Rudy’s [past] experience with NYC taxes would mark him as anti-socialist, IMHO.