Posted on 04/10/2007 4:27:25 PM PDT by Stajack
Im writing to those I consider my ideological brethren, after reading a lot of the commentary here regarding Imus latest rhetorical riff. I believe that most Freepers are, like me, disgusted at the ill- conceived stab at humor by him and his sidekick Bernard McGuirk. But in the aftermath of his actual words, Imus sought to make amends with Sharpton and Jackson. This was a brilliant move that accomplished two things. First, it caused a lot of us to take our scrutiny off of Imus, and to focus on the utter hypocrisy of Sharpton and Jackson. Second (and more importantly for me), it PROVIDED COVER FOR THE ENABLERS OF IMUS. Who am I talking about? Lets see, Tim Russert, David Gregory, Chris Matthews, Howard Fineman, Jonathan Alter
the list goes on and on. These folks are enablers because for 30 years their ilk has enhanced the reputation and prestige of Imus, all the while winking and nodding at his verbal missiles. What have they gotten in return? A PLATFORM TO LAUNCH IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE AGAINST US AND THOSE WE SUPPORT. Ironically, in the midst of the withering scrutiny of Imus, Sharpton and Jackson, most of the enablers are morphing into objective journalists attempting to help Imus "find redemption' so we can all "move forward together. As Im writing this I see Brian William sweet talking the Rutgers coach , Vivien Stringer. To Williams and Co., I say STICK IT. Freepers, these are the same folks who would tar and feather Bennett, Limbaugh, Hannity or ANY CONSERVATIVE in similar circumstances. But because of our fixation on Sharpton and Jackson, the enablers are getting a pass. This is AT LEAST as much political as it is racial. Eye on the target, PLEASE.
Like it..or hate it...it’s just free speech. Period.
Obviously, some free speech is freer than other.
How long before “Nappy Headed Hos” comes into regular useage because of this episode?
No! Why should I be ANYTHING after hearing what some brain dead old hippie radio jock like Imus says? Good grief, if you reacted to every statement made like him and his ilk you would be an emotional basket case. I ma as effected by what he says as I am by the incoherent ramblings of some spaced out homeless vagrant who walks by.
Dang, I just knew somebody was going to beat me to that remark.
Note to self:... Why did you waste valuable seconds of your life commenting on this?
|
Yes, I saw it. I didn't care for the black comedian. Everytime he said "b's", "h's", and "n's", I winced, because (sadly) he was just giving ammunition to Imus and folks like him.
I would suggest you read it again.........
Imus has said worse, so the question is, "why now?"
I believe Imus will not return.
Amen.
Who’s using who....I think is the question.
I saw it, and it's an opinion I agree with.
I can’t help but note the old saying that if one lives by the sword they will surely die by the sword. The hypocrisy of the Left is mind boggling. I’m a conservative but I would never think to use that kind of language. And we are the “evil” ones to hear these creeps talk. God only help the Republic if Hillary with her profanity laced language is elected to president. Decent people don’t use this kind of language — period.
I heard him on the radio today....Seemed half-way reasonable.
“If a tree falls in the woods and there’s not a reporter on site to report a possible resounding roar that may have occured and potential cataclysmic damage that ensued, did it make a noise?”
This morning on a radio talk show someone who sounded like he knew what he was talking about (I missed the intro) said that guests on Imus are really surprised when they learn how small his audience share is. Since everyone they know watches Imus, they think that everyone else does too. The MSM is really isolated in their little cocoon world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.