Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Operate on a Platform of Hate (Pelosi Smackdown!)
NewsMax ^ | April 4, 2007 | E. Ralph Hostetter

Posted on 04/06/2007 12:09:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Like flotsam on a sea of hate, the far left liberal contingency of the U.S. Congress seems to be drifting far from the principles established by the U.S. Constitution.

Having failed, so far, to divide congressional members of the left into numerous commanders in chief to direct America's war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan, the one and only, self-proclaimed "most powerful woman in the world," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has taken over the U.S. ship of state and floated off to Damascus, Syria, with a crew made up of members of Congress.

The U.S. Constitution confines the U.S. Congress to matters clearly defined as legislative.

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Arthur Vandenberg under the administration of President Nixon stated quite emphatically, "politics stops at the water's edge." The U.S. Constitution specifically assigns matters of state, including treaties, to the president of the United States, who, through his secretary of state, deals directly with all foreign powers.

President Bush admonished Pelosi in a Rose Garden question-and-answer session on April 3, calling her trip "counterproductive."

"Going to Syria sends mixed signals, signals in the region and, of course, mixed signals to President Assad," Bush said. "And by that I mean, you know, photo opportunities and/or meetings with President Assad lead the Assad government to believe they're part of the mainstream of the international community, when in fact, they're a state sponsor of terror."

In a most contemptible manner, Speaker Pelosi has refused the request of the president of the United States. Pelosi has undercut the effectiveness of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: congress; cutandrun; defeatocrats; democrats; dhimmicrats; georgewbush; harryreid; iraq; islamophiles; loganact; muhammadsminions; nancypelosi; presidentbush; prosecutepelosi; sanfrannan; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Preach it, Brother Hostetter!!
1 posted on 04/06/2007 12:09:06 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Payback for 2000 - didn’t I read where the Left would never acknowledge GWB as the president, and disobey him at any turn?


2 posted on 04/06/2007 12:15:23 PM PDT by Old Sarge (+ /_\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Justice Department should be directed by President Bush to investigate Pelosi. It is time to take on the RATS.
3 posted on 04/06/2007 12:17:14 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Pelosi violated the Logan Act and needs to be prosecuted. If you haven’t done so, write your representative. We need to urge congress to remove her from office.


4 posted on 04/06/2007 12:17:54 PM PDT by rob21 (Duncan Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Like flotsam on a sea of hate, the far left liberal contingency Democrats of the U.S. Congress seems to be drifting far from the principles established by the U.S. Constitution."
5 posted on 04/06/2007 12:21:23 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rob21

It is my understanding that the Logan Act does NOT apply to members of Congress.


6 posted on 04/06/2007 12:36:36 PM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABELER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rob21

I will certainly call my Reps. and Senators. That being said, I do not expect to hear the two words “Logan Act” on the news anytime....ever.


7 posted on 04/06/2007 12:40:32 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (STOP - Hildabeast, Shrillary, Hitlery, Billary, Her Thighness, Sen. Cankles, Dukakis-in-Drag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aria

I got a different perspective from the WSJ today. This is a good article.


The Logan Act makes it a felony and provides for a prison sentence of up to three years for any American, “without authority of the United States,” to communicate with a foreign government in an effort to influence that government’s behavior on any “disputes or controversies with the United States.” Some background on this statute helps to understand why Ms. Pelosi may be in serious trouble.

http://opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110009908


8 posted on 04/06/2007 12:43:49 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (STOP - Hildabeast, Shrillary, Hitlery, Billary, Her Thighness, Sen. Cankles, Dukakis-in-Drag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bang on!


9 posted on 04/06/2007 12:53:59 PM PDT by Edgerunner (I am here to learn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria

” Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.”

That’s the Logan Act. There is no exception for members of congress.


10 posted on 04/06/2007 12:54:10 PM PDT by rob21 (Duncan Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Her Hatred of President Bush is the only thing that guides her. What a Baffoon!

Pray for W and Our Troops


11 posted on 04/06/2007 12:56:25 PM PDT by bray (The Surge is Working against both enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria
It is my understanding that the Logan Act does NOT apply to members of Congress.

Here's the text of the law:

§ 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments.

Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply himself, or his agent, to any foreign government, or the agents thereof, for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.

18 U.S.C. § 953 (2004).

12 posted on 04/06/2007 12:57:10 PM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
self-proclaimed "most powerful woman in the world,"

That has GOT to pi$$ Hillary and Condi off.....

13 posted on 04/06/2007 12:58:29 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

“That being said, I do not expect to hear the two words “Logan Act” on the news anytime....ever.”

Actually, I heard them discussing it on Fox News earlier today. I forget who was talking about it, but they pretty much agreed that Pelosi had committed a felony.

There’s no doubt that she committed the crime, it’s just a matter of holding her accountable.
http://www.house.gov/writerep/


14 posted on 04/06/2007 12:58:46 PM PDT by rob21 (Duncan Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
The Justice Department should be directed by President Bush to investigate Pelosi. It is time to take on the RATS.

But wait! As soon as Pelosi is back home she will rule on all the current cases before the Supreme Court.

Then we hold a coronation...

15 posted on 04/06/2007 12:59:32 PM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The reference to President Nixon is clearly a mistake for FDR—Sen. Arthur H. Vandenberg died in 1951.


16 posted on 04/06/2007 1:05:07 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

“The Justice Department should be directed by President Bush to investigate Pelosi. It is time to take on the RATS.”

LOUDER! LET THIS MESSAGE RESONATE ACROSS THE LAND! CONTACT YOUR CONGRESS CRITTER, YOUR SENATOR AND THE WHITEHOUSE.

Do NOT let this die.


17 posted on 04/06/2007 1:06:19 PM PDT by lawdude (Fred! * Fred! * Fred! * Fred! * Fred! * Fred! * Fred! * Fred! * Fred! * Fred! * Fred! * Fred! *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl
Much ado over nothing. The Logan Act has never been used to prosecute anyone in over 200 years, notwithstanding the number of times it's been invoked to threaten people like Ramsey Clark et al. in the last 40 years or so. It's also probably unconstitutionally vague. The WSJ editorialists should save their hot air for some issue on which they'll be more credible.
18 posted on 04/06/2007 1:08:36 PM PDT by Map Kernow ("I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just..." ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rob21

Thanks for the link . . .email sent to Rep. Todd Akins R-MO.


19 posted on 04/06/2007 1:25:26 PM PDT by misharu (US Congress = children without adult supervision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Aria
It is my understanding that the Logan Act does NOT apply to members of Congress.

I've seen that posted several times here.

Do you have a substantiating link?

20 posted on 04/06/2007 1:48:58 PM PDT by upchuck (A living, breathing example of the Peter Principle. Oh, forgetful, too :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson