Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/04/2007 1:06:39 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: blam

““If you had no variation at all, you wouldn’t get evolution,” Petrie told LiveScience.”

I don’t see any sign of evolution in modern man.


2 posted on 04/04/2007 1:09:49 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
How about because people have varying concepts of "beauty?"

What is attractive to one, could be ugly to another (for animals).

Add onto this humans, who hopefully are not so base that all humans marry based on physical appearance.

3 posted on 04/04/2007 1:10:03 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

4 posted on 04/04/2007 1:10:15 PM PDT by johnny7 ("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Ugly people don’t get the chance to reproduce as much........


5 posted on 04/04/2007 1:10:41 PM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
12 posted on 04/04/2007 1:12:42 PM PDT by TommyDale ("Rudy can win the War on Terror!" Perhaps, but for whose side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
For some species, females select the most attractive males to mate with: female peacocks will choose males with the longest tail feathers—the peacock version of George Clooney.
 

This should never be mentioned without referencing Zahavi.

13 posted on 04/04/2007 1:12:42 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Angelina Jolie’s pouty lips

She wasn't born with them either.

15 posted on 04/04/2007 1:12:46 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
My oh my, how educated these dumb people are.

This is easy: once upon a time, God ordained that::

“There shall be an Ass for Every Seat!”

And people have been obedient to that law since time began.

Sheesh

16 posted on 04/04/2007 1:13:06 PM PDT by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

As a seventy plus year male, I have been puzzling over this for many years. I very much appreciate this information.


18 posted on 04/04/2007 1:13:28 PM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

As my statistics professor once put it:

“The normal curve is a cruel b!tc#.”


19 posted on 04/04/2007 1:13:44 PM PDT by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

21 posted on 04/04/2007 1:14:32 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
But clearly this isn’t the case: for every Johnny Depp out there, there’s a George Costanza—in humans, birds and other animals alike.

Well! There's your proplem. I think George Costanza is WAY sexier that prissy, scary, Johnny Depp.

It all comes down to individual brain wiring. I tend to select my mates by there testosterone, sweat and agression and not their pampered, soft-handed good looks.

25 posted on 04/04/2007 1:15:28 PM PDT by colorcountry (Remember: Everyone seems normal until you get to know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

26 posted on 04/04/2007 1:15:49 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

30 posted on 04/04/2007 1:17:05 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Well that study doesn’t apply to me, so I’ll skip this thread.


31 posted on 04/04/2007 1:18:27 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

We don’t all drink beer all day.

That would fix it...:)


32 posted on 04/04/2007 1:18:31 PM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The answer is easy.

We think we know why animals pick a mate.

But we really don’t.

We just think we do.

That’s probably the case for much of biology.

Shalom.


33 posted on 04/04/2007 1:18:39 PM PDT by ArGee (Reality - what a concept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

35 posted on 04/04/2007 1:18:52 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
In some of her earlier work, Petrie showed that men with greater genetic diversity in areas of the genome relating to disease defense were also rated as more attractive by women.

Bodies better at killing bacteria smell better.

42 posted on 04/04/2007 1:23:37 PM PDT by frithguild (The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I believe the point of the research is this:

Beautiful people are more likely to possess/carry genetic (DNA) mutations. Nature wants these subtle mutations, so it makes the carriers more attractive and more likely to mate more often.

43 posted on 04/04/2007 1:24:15 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson