1 posted on
04/04/2007 1:06:39 PM PDT by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: blam
“If you had no variation at all, you wouldnt get evolution, Petrie told LiveScience.”
I don’t see any sign of evolution in modern man.
2 posted on
04/04/2007 1:09:49 PM PDT by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: blam
How about because people have varying concepts of "beauty?"
What is attractive to one, could be ugly to another (for animals).
Add onto this humans, who hopefully are not so base that all humans marry based on physical appearance.
3 posted on
04/04/2007 1:10:03 PM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
To: blam
4 posted on
04/04/2007 1:10:15 PM PDT by
johnny7
("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
To: blam
Ugly people don’t get the chance to reproduce as much........
5 posted on
04/04/2007 1:10:41 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: blam
12 posted on
04/04/2007 1:12:42 PM PDT by
TommyDale
("Rudy can win the War on Terror!" Perhaps, but for whose side?)
To: blam
For some species, females select the most attractive males to mate with: female peacocks will choose males with the longest tail feathersthe peacock version of George Clooney. This should never be mentioned without referencing Zahavi.
To: blam
Angelina Jolies pouty lips She wasn't born with them either.
To: blam
My oh my, how educated these dumb people are.
This is easy: once upon a time, God ordained that::
“There shall be an Ass for Every Seat!”
And people have been obedient to that law since time began.
Sheesh
16 posted on
04/04/2007 1:13:06 PM PDT by
Al Gator
(Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
To: blam
As a seventy plus year male, I have been puzzling over this for many years. I very much appreciate this information.
18 posted on
04/04/2007 1:13:28 PM PDT by
davisfh
To: blam
As my statistics professor once put it:
“The normal curve is a cruel b!tc#.”
19 posted on
04/04/2007 1:13:44 PM PDT by
Ramius
([sip])
To: blam
21 posted on
04/04/2007 1:14:32 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: blam
But clearly this isnt the case: for every Johnny Depp out there, theres a George Costanzain humans, birds and other animals alike. Well! There's your proplem. I think George Costanza is WAY sexier that prissy, scary, Johnny Depp.
It all comes down to individual brain wiring. I tend to select my mates by there testosterone, sweat and agression and not their pampered, soft-handed good looks.
25 posted on
04/04/2007 1:15:28 PM PDT by
colorcountry
(Remember: Everyone seems normal until you get to know them.)
To: blam
26 posted on
04/04/2007 1:15:49 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: blam
30 posted on
04/04/2007 1:17:05 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: blam
Well that study doesn’t apply to me, so I’ll skip this thread.
31 posted on
04/04/2007 1:18:27 PM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
To: blam
We don’t all drink beer all day.
That would fix it...:)
32 posted on
04/04/2007 1:18:31 PM PDT by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: blam
The answer is easy.
We think we know why animals pick a mate.
But we really don’t.
We just think we do.
That’s probably the case for much of biology.
Shalom.
33 posted on
04/04/2007 1:18:39 PM PDT by
ArGee
(Reality - what a concept.)
To: blam
35 posted on
04/04/2007 1:18:52 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: blam
In some of her earlier work, Petrie showed that men with greater genetic diversity in areas of the genome relating to disease defense were also rated as more attractive by women. Bodies better at killing bacteria smell better.
42 posted on
04/04/2007 1:23:37 PM PDT by
frithguild
(The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
To: blam
I believe the point of the research is this:
Beautiful people are more likely to possess/carry genetic (DNA) mutations. Nature wants these subtle mutations, so it makes the carriers more attractive and more likely to mate more often.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson