Skip to comments.
Gore mulling third party run in '08 [Green Party]
Insight Mag.com ^
| 3/28/2007
Posted on 03/28/2007 5:24:56 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420, 421-440, 441-460, 461-472 last
To: bruinbirdman
This is the *only* way I could ever see myself donating to the Gore campaign.
461
posted on
04/01/2007 7:23:01 PM PDT
by
Bishop_Malachi
(Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
To: Enterprise
I hope Gore runs as a Green in 2008. If he does, Hillary Clinton won't have a chance at winning.
462
posted on
04/01/2007 7:24:11 PM PDT
by
3_wheeler
(Freedom Isn't Free (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conservative_americans))
To: bruinbirdman
Gore mulling third party run in '08 [Green Party]
463
posted on
04/01/2007 7:40:18 PM PDT
by
NewLand
(Always remember September 11, 2001)
To: NewLand
If it weren't sacrilegious, I'd add this to my prayer list! Something is needed to deflate the Rodham-rodent's momentum.
464
posted on
04/01/2007 7:43:35 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
To: bruinbirdman
Oh, boy! The Europeanization of the Left! Soon, the US can also have nominally conservative Presidents appeasing liberal supermajorities, wrecking conservativism, but always able to win re-election because the Left is fractured.
465
posted on
04/01/2007 7:57:15 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: Wallace T.
Here's a more realistic scenario:
Hillary Clinton vs. Al Gore vs. Rudy Giuliani vs. Michael Bloomberg, with the only conservative being some small-potatoes party candidates like the Constitution Party.
You don't want to know how complicated the U.S. electoral system can get when the leading candidate doesn't come even close to winning a majority. To make a long story short, if no candidate gets a majority of electors, the election gets decided by the House of Representatives.
Just wait how complicated it gets when California goes 38% for Giuliani, 26% for Clinton, 24% for Gore, 8% for Bloomberg and 2% for the Constitutional Party, and 2% for the Libertarian Party.
And, if that's not bad enough, wait until New York tosses in the Conservative Party, Liberal Party, Working Family Party, Right to Life Party, Fusion Party, and so forth...
466
posted on
04/01/2007 8:29:14 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: bruinbirdman
RUN 3rd Party Al....YES!
467
posted on
04/02/2007 6:47:55 AM PDT
by
Candor7
To: Candor7
He must be nuts, if he ever got serious about running, he would be dead meat on the Morticians slab before night fall, I don’t know what but he would have some kind of a bad accident. I guarantee you.. If you wanted to gamble buy an insurance policy of Al, if he enters the arena
468
posted on
04/02/2007 8:27:50 PM PDT
by
BooBoo1000
(Some times I wake up grumpy, other times I let her sleep/)
To: pissant
I would not vote for Gore if he ran for the city limits!
To: bruinbirdman
To: Always Right
I’m dyin’here. This is the funniest thread I’ve read in months.
Al is brilliant. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
471
posted on
04/05/2007 1:50:02 PM PDT
by
get'emall
(Bullshit offsets for sale. Everyday Low Prices!)
To: sissyjane
Surprised this never got more responses. I emailed it to all my “Green” relatives and acquaintances.
472
posted on
04/09/2007 8:07:40 PM PDT
by
bluefish
(Are you really that thick, or are you simply trolling for fun?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420, 421-440, 441-460, 461-472 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson