Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two MiG-29 fighters collide over southern Russia
Ria Novosti,Russia ^ | 21/ 03/ 2007

Posted on 03/21/2007 9:13:52 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Two MiG-29 fighters collide over southern Russia - 1

18:52 | 21/ 03/ 2007

ROSTOV-ON-DON, March 21 (RIA Novosti) - Two Russian MiG-29 Fulcrum fighters have collided in the Rostov Region in southern Russia, but both pilots survived the accident, a local police source said Wednesday.

The collision occurred near the Millerovo airfield in the afternoon, about 220 kilometers (130 miles) north of the regional center, Rostov-on-Don.

Both pilots have been transported to a nearby military hospital with minor facial lacerations, Air Force spokesman Alexander Drobyshevsky said, adding that the crash did not cause any injuries to anyone on the ground, damage to ground installations or the environment.

"The pilots are alive," Drobyshevsky said. "They have been picked up by two Mi-8 rescue helicopters and brought to a military hospital at the Millerovo airfield."

The spokesman also said that the aircraft did not carry any combat payload at the time of the crash.

A team of military investigators has been dispatched to the crash site to probe the causes of the accident and the Military Prosecutor's Office of the North Caucasus Military District has opened a criminal investigation into the collision.

The MiG-29 Fulcrum is as a single-seat fighter-interceptor with excellent maneuverability and basic ground attack capability.

It was one of the Soviet Union's most important combat aircraft in the last years of the Cold War, and remains an important asset for the Russian Air Force. The aircraft has been exported to 27 countries, and is being updated with improved avionics and electronics to keep it in service well into the 21st century.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; mig; mig29; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
1 posted on 03/21/2007 9:13:55 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Ethanol problems.........


2 posted on 03/21/2007 9:16:00 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Wow.

Glad the pilots are safe.


3 posted on 03/21/2007 9:16:54 AM PDT by roaddog727 (BullS##t does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Tuffski shitzke, y'all.


4 posted on 03/21/2007 9:21:10 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group -- Distributed IO and counter-PsyOps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Kind of a bummer for those guys since the story indicates that they are now proceding with a "criminal investigation" of the incident. Why not just an investigation of the accident and let it lead where leads?


5 posted on 03/21/2007 9:21:45 AM PDT by g_gunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; tx_eggman

From the markings on the wing, I see they are sponsored by Pepsi, not Coca-Cola.

They lost my support.


6 posted on 03/21/2007 9:21:49 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (Islam... if ya can't join 'em, beat 'em.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Beautiful aircraft. Sexy beast.


7 posted on 03/21/2007 9:22:10 AM PDT by zarf (Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Not the first time it's happened.
8 posted on 03/21/2007 9:30:59 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpinnerWebb

Coca-Cola's logo, as viewed in a mirror, says, in Arabic, No Mecca No Allah.........or some such......


9 posted on 03/21/2007 9:31:32 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SpinnerWebb

http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/islam.asp

They say it ain't so, but wierder things have happened........


10 posted on 03/21/2007 9:35:35 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

That was an interesting video!

Didn't both the pilots make it safe?


11 posted on 03/21/2007 9:54:51 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Yes, they both ejected safely, and as I recall, at least one of the pilots flew again the next day at the air show.


12 posted on 03/21/2007 9:58:55 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I thought the Paris Airshow isn't until spring.
Usually, the Rooshkies wait until then to reveal their latest collisions.


13 posted on 03/21/2007 10:05:42 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Oopski! Practicing for the Paris airshow? The Russians usually entertain the crowds with some spectacular crashes.


14 posted on 03/21/2007 10:12:50 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick; Yo-Yo

That video has been used often to promote a very interesting Russian contraption-their ejection seats(i think it's the K-36).Heck,some people even considered it for the F-22 Raptor a while ago.


15 posted on 03/21/2007 10:18:12 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4; sukhoi-30mki
Tuffski shitzke, y'all.

Yob tvaya mat tovarische.

16 posted on 03/21/2007 11:16:10 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

'Ethanol problems" - Yep. The flight controllers, being drunk, saw everything in double. It was the same plane colliding with itself [a new tactical maneuver].


17 posted on 03/21/2007 11:58:53 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

18 posted on 03/21/2007 12:54:17 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I assume they are inferior to our similar aircraft. How do they stack up against the Saabs?


19 posted on 03/21/2007 1:41:47 PM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

The MIG-29 might still be the best dogfighting airplane in the world, or close to it. One expert I talked to said that if you matched a MIG-29 against an F-14 in a dogfight, the best pilot would win.

But dogfighting is not expected to be a major issue in any future wars. If we went to war with North Korea or Iran, their MIG-29s would be lucky to get off the ground.

The biggest weakness of the MIG-29 is its range. It can't go as far as American planes on one tank of fuel.


20 posted on 03/21/2007 2:06:09 PM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson